03 November 2009

Odyssey of overcoming the shock of homelessness is a big laugh

An alienating propensity impacts all of us, unless we change our story's intent, avoiding the unnecessary waste.

As we neglect or abandon our friends and families and the countless associates that make up our life, we see the intensity of our indifference overpower any sense of satisfaction in our common existence. Even when we've seen our way out of homelessness, like me, there is a reality to navigate, and a way to keep playing.

Instead, it's like the airwaves that reach out, letting them make a means for our happiness, such as after listening to a favorite tune on the radio and reacting to blurbs afterwards asking for support (KFOG, by example, continues to have donated over $4 million from what listeners provided for supporting San Francisco Bay Area food banks' resources). We learn how to play, or to have fun with life, even when desperation stares us in the face.

Changing our indifference changes us, when we change our scope and our intent, and changes the lives of millions of people, whether we know it or not (those who might have gone hungry, or worse, those who could be like us in the worst predicaments): $1 can provide an average of three meals, which amazes most people who grumble at the price of a meal at fast food outlets; however, when one sees how to get food, how to use volunteerism, how to make sense of the resources available to networks of people, the amazement vanishes: a little money or a little effort can go a long way for those who know how to use funds or energy.
Big dreams can have big poignant reality
I know from running a shoestring operation of a kitchen as I grow what was a bar's closet transformed into what provides means for providing sustenance while indulging.

I've had to have disciplines and creative abandon of strategies that I learned, working with so many Telemachus guides (aren't we always looking for someone, aside from our parents, for direction?), in my odyssey of outwitting my culinary plight: how do I satisfy others through the simple means of food?

My dream is to take the revenue that my food business will build and use that resource to help build a means for others (my friend, Bill, who's struggled with the reality of homelessness, has seen the help I've needed, for instance, and using his assistance as a means to help with overcoming his struggles, I keep order in my kitchen's operations, since I know I can't run things forever alone; just that strategy of getting help is a foothold to how we all can derive order in our human universal dilemmas, since we all need food from time to time). Simple work and physics compel me. Having fun with the work and the sense of overcoming the elemental physics of burnout, with humor, or lightedness, is my passion. I knew at some point that the work would become too much to handle. That it wouldn't take long at all before the few would become crowds, satisfied or wanting to be satisfied.

Just on a whim of fulfilling, actually providing, sustenance, while others were indulging, my worst reality came true: the other day, one meal that I'd put out was undeliverable, due to someone who'd overindulged too much, and, having ordered his eggs over easy with the big fry Traditional Irish Breakfast I served, when he'd almost instantaneously gotten 86'd, his breakfast fortunately became someone else's (funny how the little tragedies can have their righteous resolve; the recipient of the gift of the breakfast had only one comment: "perfect eggs, it would've been such a waste to toss them"), who told me the old joke: a chicken and an egg are lying in bed, with the chicken smoking a cigarette, a satisfied smile on his face and the egg frowning, looking a bit pissed off, to which the egg mutters, to no one in particular, "Well, I guess we answered that question!"

As I use my discipline to make my little dream build, the small potatoes of my work sustain me and show me my way through what could become resentments or griefs that otherwise might devise my downfall. Making food can get to primal instincts; after satisfying, after overwhelming, after jeopardizing any prospect of getting what can never quite live up to that last bite, that last taste, that last exquisite indulgence, the body wants the mind to forget, to yield, to comply, or to adapt.

Think oysters.

Chocolate.

Caramel.

Brie.

Once you've had the best, nothing else sustains, or confers what a righteous gift bestows. One just feels too good,

As we all learn, orgasms, savory, sweet or otherwise muskily intense, subside, even without sex.

The story completes itself over and over and over: we're only human. Irresolute, the mind still wavers. Life is too quick, otherwise, unlike an egg.


29 October 2009

Opportunities abound for getting involved with nobody's business

Our ostracizing tendencies and disinterestedness play a part in the social dynamics of our self-serving natures: when we really consider how we encounter or deal with our perplexing world, sometimes we don't know what we can trust.

Even when there are movements to organize overcoming abject poverty, no one seems to know or, perhaps, to have any need to participate (I didn't know, for instance, until afterwards, of the recent event of a Guinness World Record's 173 million people's mobilization for eradicating world poverty, and news of its lackluster "poor turnout" in San Francisco).

One needn't be a fool to know how hard it can be to escape the streets (especially for those who have low self-esteem and who honestly lack options) or to trust the systems that provide refuge from a hard life.

No matter how much we pretend to think that we have abiding love to help ourselves or others overcome desperate circumstances, and that we are in harmony with getting through tumultuous or conflicting situations, we still suffer and struggle with associations or with neglecting the stranger relationships that create aggravations or resentments and consequential reproach and loathing, many of which collectively perpetuate our singularity, our aloneness, and our world's collective problems.

We seek attention. And approval. And protection. Daily. Even when we have moments or remnants of profound realizations of how we can live in harmony and well-being, we often betray our instincts from such inclinations, ending up with a "what-about-me" mantra pervading our every thought and action.
How we regain and retain dignity in awkward realities
Carol was obviously trembling when she approached me as I was leaving my work for the day. "Buy me some food, anything?" she pleaded with a stammering in her voice.

I was immediately having to confront a stranger who was demanding something from me in my "what-about-me" mode. I shook off any self-regard, letting my parental, or friend-to-all response of reconciliation take hold.

The bridge of Carol's nose was freshly scarred, the blood still drying. As I initially suggested that, being a chef, that I'd make her something quick from my kitchen's céad míle fáilte shenanigans (out of where I'd just left, Ireland's 32, the place to which I pointed that she mistook, it seemed, for just a bar). She'd shook her head, demurred, and I suggested instead we walk a few doors up the street to a pizza place; I then bought a slice of what was ready, and she hastily devoured my meagre gift as if it was the first real sustenance she'd had in days.

Concerned about what I took for more obvious interests, I asked about her injury. "Boyfriend problems," she'd replied reluctantly, almost dissuasively, as if I'd avoid delving into the morass she may have already been presenting. Immediately I suggested places she could go (shelters, 24-hour crisis centers for domestic abuse, women's advocacy groups).

"I don't want the police involved," she answered, dismissively avoiding the issue of help. "I don't want to be a burden," she said. I wasn't about to act adamant, yet I felt a responsibility. Doubts of what to do. She'd simply refused anymore help.

She hugged me as I grievously left; I still felt her trembling.
Dismissive maladaptations continue, despite our resolve to change
Only two blocks away from encountering Carol, after what may have been only ten minutes, while I was waiting for the bus, I saw a guy sorting through trash bins for recyclables; I pointed to plastics discarded on the street to which he nodded his gratitude, picking them up as he shuffled down the street.

We live with the odd paradox that we, as a society, which can now speak openly and unabashedly about topics that were once unspeakable, still remain largely silent when it comes to dealing with significant problems. Some get dismissive: "what a buncha nutjobs, spacecases, no good lazy sonsabitches," some say to what appears our regards to this crazy world's bafflements.

This month, NFL players are rumbling onto the field in pink cleats and sweatbands to raise awareness about breast cancer. On December 1st, World AIDS Day will engage political and health care leaders from every part of the globe. Illnesses that were once discussed only in hushed tones are now part of healthy conversation and social activism (although when it comes to bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress, schizophrenia or depression, an uncharacteristic coyness takes over, and we often say nothing: the mentally ill frighten and embarrass us, and so we marginalize the people who most need our acceptance). Our homeless shelters become the only place to contain those with whom we've been unable to provide help with their socially unadaptable behaviors: self-medicating with alcohol or other substances become the commonly acceptable means for maladaptive disorders, only compounding the problems that exacerbate all of us; getting work poses the biggest obstacle for many people who have no other solution to their dilemma than the shelter systems ("The fact that you're undocumented doesn't mean you're not a person under the United States Constitution, and if we can't stand up for the Constitution in San Francisco, then where can we stand up for it in this country?" Supervisor David Campos has said, well-knowing the containment of undocumented workers in California and the U.S. from his firsthand experience).

Such thoughts of societal ideological dissonance were running through my head as I waited for the bus. Doubts of disappointments of our once great democracy's culture and its current empirical disarray distracted me.
Our story has no purpose, it seems
The guy gathering recyclables shouted, "Carol! Over here! Cross the street! What're you doing?" I realized this was the boyfriend.

"You best be kind to that woman," I said to him, using my kitchen timbre voice (familiar to anyone who must work in the din of a kitchen's business), just so he knew I meant to get his and only his attention.

"Carol, what're you telling people?" he shouted. "She's just drunk," he said to me, almost apologetically (for her behavior, of course), telling me "she fell down some stairs." He didn't want to have any confrontation with me, he'd seemed to express, yet he seemed obviously the type to be the perpetrator of her injuries, from what I gathered of his sense of protectiveness, or tentative possessiveness, of his business, which he reminded me was, as he said from some distance, mumbling "none o' anybody's business, anyway."

I wasn't ready to pursue any course to involve myself with circumstances beyond my control. Yet I was in conflict, even as I boarded the bus. My reluctance to intervene had me in a daze. Sometimes I know what I could do only results in worse predicaments. Sometimes all I can do is mind my own business, despite knowing my alternative options.


17 October 2009

What the America dream can insist on such as us (or what's the crack in this day?)

What a difference taking risks makes.

With the desperation I encounter everyday in San Francisco, the men on street corners with their empty cups wanting change, the women walking with empty stares worrying of the ravages life has made of their once dignified beauty, the youth who turn to gangs to have some empty sense of belonging, all such grievous reality leaves me wondering about the sense of hope that America once held, just a year ago. I often must pause, without uttering a word.

As President Obama rushed through San Francisco's heart of Civic Center, the Tenderloin and to Union Square's destination the other day, the different encounters of brief looks out his limousine's windows that he must have had were surely not all politics with his agenda here of fundraising.

Afghanistan and Iraq trouble him, with all the mounting and pending costs.

Simple economics of a once stalwart and proud nation must concern him.

How we ever mean to survive with issues of health care, being in trillions of dollars in debt and overdrawn, virtually destitute as a nation, and incredulous with our dissipated or depleted savings ever regaining any value within our foreseeable future, or even at best remaining with any hope, all such scope must seem to him like some parallel galaxy and some discordant time, some impossible dream.

Yet somehow he keeps a smile on a brave demeanor.

Sometimes I wish I could see that same smile on the faces I encounter as I get around San Francisco.
The poor you will always have with you
At least I do hope. Being never poor in spirit. For those who scoff at enduring or defying odds at getting beyond scarcity, getting beyond survival, getting beyond abundance, I must attest to the spirit of such as us who can endure and defy the chance to reconcile or to redeem our natures. We aren't always who we appear to be.

Out of some hard work and a blessed opportunity, I have found a way out of the homeless desperation that I have had to live.

With, again, a summertime of feeding youth at Camp Mendocino (the Boys & Girls Club of San Francisco's retreat at which I cooked for over 200 people daily), I took my savings to invest in building on what I know: a kitchen sharing blessed bounties from local farmers within a setting once familiar (for over 22 years, a local bar & grill, which never really had anything to offer from its kitchen, except reheated frozen concoctions or the rare happy hour offerings), Ireland's 32, a warm, inviting wood and mirrored pub, which has been transforming into a public house, what the Irish consider a refuge from the daily encounters of sometimes grievous and sometimes serendipitous existence. Hard work and the bollix of aggravation that we always incipiently seem to have to meet.

Often the character of Ireland's 32 has the character of a museum for its heritage of honoring Belfast, the IRA and the history of fighting for Irish freedom from the British sovereignty's tyranny, exploitation and oppression; plaques representing each county's coat-of-arms hang proudly around an etched mirror behind the bar, while paintings of famous Irish writers and pro-independence paraphernalia have long been the decor in the two-story building, with additions of the more timely Irish cultural mix of sports, music and other cultural remembrances adorning the space.

"What's the craic?" the Irish will say to bewildered looks from Americans who visit the place (Americans wonder what "what's the crack?" means, though for 50 years the greeting fulfills some sense of belonging, in my opinion, conveying a polysemic welcoming for any hint of joy). For me, the community that regularly converges upon Ireland's 32 is a mix of rebelliousness in the form of heavy drinking combined with a resolute moderation of conviviality with respect for the indulgences to which everyone's subject, from time to time.

Time is a healing device, by any view.
Such as us who keep respect and dignity do understand resentment and reconciling
Joss Stone sings, "don't tell me that I can't, I can; don't tell me that I won't, I will!" Ah, America! Do we know how to work, after the healing's done? Even after the hope's had its hurt beyond what we'd expected, what we'd endured, what we'd survived?

Joy that is often missing from people's lives often seems like the crack of a grin on the Ireland's 32 regular customers. Some are Irish by heritage having grown up in the States with only a hint of the true bearing of the Irish tradition, while many are wearing the full breadth of their Irish like a pride of armor. Such as us who have grown up in America knowing its reputation and diminishing pride will always keep a sense of the immigrant marching off to ever broader frontiers. Though we may have lost touch with ourselves and our natures, we may be there for the brief drink, or the brief encounter with a perfect unbeknownst mate, or to resent some twit's idea of what they may be assessing of us, or perhaps to an operatic respect for just the existential blessedness of a day in the life. Our day, our life, our reason for being.

Or to finding our place at a bar or a restaurant at the ends of the universe.

The drinks are often flowing mightily at Ireland's 32, and now so does the accompanying food, for "sustenance while indulging," as I've set the menu's direction and scope.

I'd have likely stayed in the desperation of homeless existence were it not for the savings from working and living at Camp Mendocino along with the consequent opportunity falling into place with opening up a kitchen of my very own doing. I've been accused of being out of my element what with all the serious dire realities, which I surely do know (first hand), of running and keeping a business, especially one dealing with the subject of food.

There is likely no greater failure than dealing with a business providing sustenance. People rely on their daily bread. And beverages. On the other hand, from those who I've known while in the harshness of homelessness, who have since accused me of gloating about my circumstance, I have received some reproach for not helping them out of their situations too; I will, yet the business needs to get its feet first into the mix. When I get comments about elements that need fixing, I instantly realize it's on me, not the operations. I am the operations.

Chef, steward, stocking superintendent and top bottle washer.

A job's to be done.

Forget about the bottlenecks, make it feng shui; forget about the ego, make it blessed. Forget about what others have done to put us in circumstances beyond our control, and forget about blaming God; the fun, the craic, the blessedness is on us to derive its purpose.
Thriving on spirit
The impeccability in my kitchen is what I'm after to offer; I know my position, titled yet impecunious. I must still deliver the perfect fish, meats, cheeses, sauces, eggs, herbs or whatever the comestible needs must be. Insistently. Being a one man show means a certain accountability before I can put the burden on others to share. Even how to wash dishes or to be stewarding the customer wishes and needs. I believe I can. Surely before I can put the burden on others to help me. Yet, after I do, I believe that anyone can follow, responsibly. And thrive.

Eventually.

I realize I can't be in two places at once, or promise to one while comprising another, nor can I stay afloat in business while insisting on promises impossible to make evident. My intent above all is to prove my spirit.

I am living the homeless hope. Or I am living the American dream, the human dream, despite being even still virtually homeless.


23 May 2009

Pariahs, pundits and people on the tightrope play their parts

We see the worse getting worse with the poor populace growing in an ever worrisome peril. This isn't a lovely night at the opera.

A chill wind had been blowing.

At San Francisco's 150 Otis, about 100 of us had been waiting for a shelter bed assignment, having earlier that afternoon gotten on the signup list from the draw of numbers to get on the list and consequently getting priority ranking to get a bed; being among the 40 that evening who had the best chance, I'd been trying to be patient. I've come to accept there are reasons for the frustrating bureaucratic practices of providing daily beds. At San Francisco's main resource center, waiting for evening beds to become available, the regularly overflowing crowd inside often means for me and a few others being faced with shivering, or huddling crouched in ourselves, outside, braving the cold, turning away from the luff of the wind, hoping to get a bed, sooner than later.

With so many in my same circumstances no matter what predicament brought them here, I've learned how to be friendly yet without becoming a victim, or without becoming a preying pariah with others who also patiently or agitatedly wait. I have no spare change, no spare cigarettes, no spare bus transfer. Not much but neediness; I've learned to have only suggestions for help (since, when I was new to this predicament, there were few who directed me to the routines, which thousands have endured in San Francisco and, with the growing numbers, have had to make work for them, with no guaranteed prospects).

I watch the pundits of homelessness and learn the desolation and the survival skills.
Plurality of indigent reality
Many of the people who get into these homeless predicaments ― even if they've had work their entire lives and they are used to avoiding depending on anyone ― sometimes end up here at shelters, without a clue to its circus of characters and games. Not all of the people seeking beds in the shelters are addicts, alcoholics, mentally or socially challenged, or permanently destitute, as many of society's more cynical claim in dissuading the funds or resources or attention given the poor. Some of the poor are just ordinary people in completely dire circumstances.

Indigent types do, though, tend to need a sense of hope. Sometimes. In their dismay and with their frowzy appearances, the homeless population has its disparaging stigma that's an endless struggle.

Without the frustrations that are almost always the given, more and more of us face that we're not alone, that we're feeling temporarily isolated, yet we're all struggling with the same lack of resolve, that the divisiveness of which we play a part is often just a game. Sometimes we have no rules for the game, we just play how we've always played, like a teasing on the playground assimilating our will to outlast the worst of whatever bullies us.

Alex was being his uppity, mischievous self when a beautiful woman walked by San Francisco's main shelter resource center, 150 Otis, where we homeless get beds, or wait for them, most of us men with heads buried, and trying to distract ourselves from the purposelessness of the welfare preponderance. The woman was walking her little terrier and she seemed to know the neighborhood, ignoring the usual catcalls, or what passes for whistling in the wind. She seemed to have a confidence of her allure with a grace to her pulchritudinous aloofness.

"Très beau!" Alex shouted in his best try at French, wanting to make sure this stranger knew her attractiveness. To him. "An' I likes yer lil pups too," he added. In his hoodie and his heavy, long black leather overcoat, he can appear menacing, yet I've seen he's usually just another one of many, putting on a good face in an ominous reality.

The woman was nearly a block away before she turned around looking as if she was checking to see if she was safe, that no one followed her, while her little terrier stopped to smell a tree trunk, which was when I said to Alex, "you're scaring her."

"I is not! She know she likes it, you watch, she be makin' d'block and be back," he said in his familiar Louisiana Yat dialect. I've known Alex, and I know he's outwardly very gregarious, usually getting on with everyone. I know he's also apt to get into mischief. Yet I also know he's not one to pick fights or to take any conversation as challenge.

"Right," I said, "that's why she kept walking straight ahead and finally looked back after getting a block away, to see if she was safe."

"You 'on't know what you's talkin' 'bout," he countered, "she like th' attention."

Alex cocked his head at me as if I was disrespectfully castigating him. A half-sneer stuck on his face and then he smiled, looking me square in the eyes from 15 feet away.
Getting into other people's business
Tito had noticed Alex's sudden upset, Tito being one of the other guys who seems to hang around regularly at 150 Otis, seeming to be always scamming something, things he's found he'd sell for a quarter, the quarter in trade for a cigarette, or finding a discard ticket for the evening bed draw list, or someone's print-out for a nightly bed assignment, maybe even a bus transfer when he'd need to leave when it looked as if no beds were ever about to come up.

And Tito, being 18, loves to prove his ego's claims. He likes to spout his hiphop persona and dance about on the sidewalk as if it's his stage.

Tito has taken this section of San Francisco as his territory. He never seems to be waiting for a bed like the rest of us. And he has preyed on those of us waiting for shelter with his taunts. So it was almost too easy for him to come at me with his swagger and leer, a sillily half-diabolical murmur, coming within inches of my face, "don' be dissin' my boy, yo' ugly ass jus' jealous and he jus' be tellin' some truth." The stink of his cigarette breath gagged me, which he took for fear, as I reflexively gulped and exhaled through my nostrils.

"Truth?" I answered, "he's just hitting on some woman who's a block away now. I could see her fear from here."

"You boasting on me, cuz? 'Cause I'll take you out, sure as you're shakin'."

"For one thing, get away from me. I'm friends with Alex, else I wouldn't've said a word. And I'm not shaking out of any fear, youngster."

"You callin' me out, cuz?" Hostility wanted to rise in him, purely for the thrill. "'Cause you best not be callin' me youngster, ol' man. I'll put yo' punk-pussy-coward dumbass down."

"Pardon me, please," I said, "if you're expecting me to fall for your goading, I have no need or desire to fight. So let's just straighten that out right now." He was almost nose to nose with me, as if in some TV wrestling taunt. I was ready for the first swing or punch. "What you're doing is assault. Not battery. Assault. And that's against the law, as if you didn't know."

Alex came over to run interference. He could see us on the edge of suddenly coming to blows. "Tito, 'at's my friend, here, cuz, he not meanin' no spite. He on d'good side now. C'mon, we go make d'block, see if we can go find my girl." Alex grabbed Tito by the shoulder and directed him up the street.
Games we play when we forget frustration
Not more than 15 minutes later, Alex and Tito were back and Tito came over to me, with Alex looking on behind him. Tito made a fist pump gesture to me, "sorry, my brotha, didn' mean no disrespect. Alex be tellin' me you a good guy, 'at's cool, someone's gotta do it." He seemed to be patronizing me without intending to act forgiving, or putting on a face of one upping me without either of us acting disgraced.

"I'm just tired of the false sense of domination people try to have over others on the street," I said. "Streets belong to all of us, you know?" He nodded, with a kind of oblivious shrug.

I turned away as he walked away and I tried to get back to a sense of dignity.

The wind wouldn't let me (it knows what it is to be perpetually homeless even with direction).


14 May 2009

Final solution to poverty gets our attention

Do not attempt to adjust the controls of your PCs and televisions. An emergency requires our attention: a 21st century solution, from the powers that be.

With the socioeconomic collapse and its crisis inundating us, and with the concomitant revolution mandating martial law, with measures for supervising the masses already having manifested, as conspiracy theorists warn, all the elements for responsive solutions are in place. We no longer have to worry about the debts and the mounting worries that trouble us.

Everything's manageable, so everyone can have the assurance of protection, permanently: trains are available for transport in the guise of evacuation, once martial law takes affect, and, due to any bacterial military actions resulting from revolution, biodegradable coffins are available for mass deaths; camps are ready, for containment, concentration camps, actually, internment prisons with inward and outward pointing barbed wire to prevent escape or infiltration; best of all, the usual distractions of the media will easily provide real control (we won't want to miss the ball games or the cooking shows or the talk shows entertaining us about face lifts and weight loss and child abuse).

So foreclosures and incessantly climbing unemployment are no longer the problem. The powers that be have had a plan, we can rest assured, for the growing numbers of poor and homeless.

Legislation (HR 645) already allows executive operations to proceed.

Trusted entities like Dow Chemical, Haliburton and Union Pacific have developed all the requirements while the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have full authority for every aspect of the operation's needs.

We could find out more about the control measures before the real panic arises, yet our indifference predictably distracts us. For now, we can breathe. And let the truth give us pause, calmed by how those in power have long been listening, that they were aware of our impending now certain plight.
Poverty, which we know, has its problems
We will no longer really need the daily news. We've always had other concerns anyway that had never gotten the necessary attention for solutions to our worries.

Particularly those of us living in highly urbanized populations, with practical problems like overwhelmed emergency rooms, thousands of families living in cars, petty crime, violent crime, drug crime, a revolving prison system dynamic, alcoholism, drug trades, suicide and death by exposure to toxic waste, broken families, misspent lives, malnourishment, and billions of dollars going to the bureaucracies and non-profits maintaining the day to day infrastructure (churches, shelters, soup kitchens and local government resource centers). Fraught with misery and troubles, we have sought the infinite source to the speed of darkness in which we're all too familiarly caught.

And to think our prayers had no answers, we must have been out of our minds.

Millions of us are already using the systems that the government has established, so that, while the growing catastrophes have developed the grief and avoidable predicaments, there are these prepared, nearly ready-made, solutions.

Just for us.
For how long had we assumed no one was listening?
Risking collision with pedestrians on the streets of San Francisco, I keep my eyes straight yet my vision peripherally in focus, aware of those souls of the street who seem like ghosts or ephemeral non-entities to most people.

Yet there are some, particularly artists, like Anthony Holdsworth, who manage to capture what the urban life holds, as ways to sustain the precious sights and rights of America. He doesn't just paint the architectures and the typical landmarks; he captures the people, those who most of us miss in unforgettable caricatures.

There's also Bob Okin's pictures of today's poverty, what most of us ignore.

Here, as on the streets of many great cities like San Francisco, America's ranters and mumblers and conspiracy theory pundits have provided the warnings, and sometimes, often, in my hurry to find work and other despairing concerns, I wasn't listening. "Why encourage them by paying attention, or worse, engaging?" I heard a tourist say.

San Francisco Chronicle's Kevin Fagan recently had a fractured reminiscence of 1956 Skid Row in San Francisco, comparing the current similarities. A comment to the piece made me shake my head with what a reader then offered as a consideration about what to do with the homeless population: "give them a ghetto, throw 'em in, put a wall around them and let them die and rot away from the rest of us."
Just as we thought revolution had its place, that no one in power had been listening
Then there are the powerful who I didn't see appearing in the bigger picture.

Honorable Ninth Circuit Court Judge Kim Wardlaw, from Pasadena, a likely nominee as a Supreme Court judge vetted to replace Judge Souter, wrote a 2006 opinion providing for rights to the homeless.

Jones v. City of Los Angeles (444 F.3d 1118, 9th Circuit 2006), written by Judge Wardlaw for the court, held that arresting homeless people for sleeping, sitting, or lying on sidewalks and other public property, when other public shelter is not available, violates the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

Because of such compassion, Judge Wardlaw invites dissent.

Or circumspection, as her likelihood for the nomination is gaining consensus. As promising as she is, President Obama won't need such compassion on the highest court, since law enforcement and citizen rights groups won't need such contingencies.

We'll see, for instance, in San Francisco (especially on May 19 after a rally protesting rights for tenants), if property owners have the power they seek from the courts.

All this while we've been letting our frustrations and intolerance build, the powers that be have been listening.

With DHS, FEMA, Dow, Union Pacific and Haliburton, there are those who have long had concerns for our situation's solutions in mind.


30 April 2009

Isolated and celebrity homeless lives: selflessness, selfishness and self-actualization make a difference in the world

Contradicting epiphanies about homelessness have made me more cognitive about overcoming its prevalence.

No one will argue (reasonably) there aren't enough homeless.

Today, the situation is so overwhelming and has become so pervasive due to the economic craziness with which we're all struggling. Unlike the pervasive fear that the recent H1N1 outbreak will become a pandemic, the achievement of outlasting the current socioeconomic crisis is everyone's hope and duty, whose justice will prevail.

We must endure the struggles, the costs and the shortcomings, else all is desolation.
Faces of poverty up close
Poverty eventually affects everyone. Not everyone has to deal with its harms to the extent of becoming destitute and homeless. Yet the costs of poverty and its ordeals are unavoidable.

Last weekend, I encountered His High Holiness the Dalai Lama of Tibet (incidentally, seeing how far security precautions are necessary for him, such gentleness personified, was intimidating: surrounding him, or following him everywhere, there were 50 police officers, a dozen sheriffs and over a dozen men in suits, likely federal marshals and private security staff; with all this entourage, he has a presence, much like President Obama, exuding a minimum of paranoia and a legitimacy aiming towards true historicity). Likely the most well-known homeless celebrity, the Dalai Lama visited Martin de Porres soup kitchen, which is a popular Sunday morning destination for healthy free food.

The Dalai Lama beamed and grinned impishly throughout his hour-long visit to Martin's (formally, Martin de Porres House of Hospitality, rooted in the Catholic Worker movement), offering words of encouragement to the approximately 100 guests and volunteers at the Sunday brunch. He joked with the folks while there about being in exile and about President Obama and the international economy.

As I came from behind him to replenish the potatoes which he was serving, "pardon me," I said. "95% of life is just showing up with good action." I had meant it with grace and humility.

He simply turned to me, putting his spoon down in the chafing dish of potatoes, clasped his hands together in a gesture of prayer, looked at me directly over the rim of his glasses, and nodded. I felt a chill, a sense almost of suddenly becoming one of the crows of reincarnation. Perhaps I even blushed.

Although he is from Tibet, the Dalai Lama actually resides in Dharamsala, India, due to China's political takeover. He remains hopeful of one day returning to Tibet.

"Our lives depend on others," said the Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso, as he was originally known). "Me too." His characteristic baritone sometimes prevents hearing him clearly, so that many of us in the crowd strained to hang on his every word. "My life depends on others. You are still in human society, human community. Please feel happy and feel dignity."
Making a difference in the world
Throughout The City, we see what makes a difference in people's isolated lives, such as the Dinner With Grace program that Yahoo! recently subsidized through its grant (a $5,000 grant from the Yahoo! Employee Foundation will help provide kitchen equipment that's vital to getting food to Tenderloin SROs).

We look to suggestions of free things to do in The City (some of us like me don't have time, since we're too busy in the panic to survive looking for income).

Some give in to desperation. Then, there are some who, despite being beaten and refused shelter after those beatings, refuse to give up.

Still, most of society simply ignores the homeless situation. Still, charitable organizations face funding cuts.

Later that afternoon after being at Martin's, I went shopping at Safeway. It felt weird to experience staff cheerleading at the front registers while seeking contributions for charity. Not cheering for larger amounts, they were cheering for any contributions. The cheering could be heard throughout the store over two dozen times in the 20 minutes I was there at the Market/Church store. It reminded me of the "Forbes 500" homeless and struggling poor Americans: those who've faced foreclosures due to sub-prime lending practices, those who've faced layoffs with huge corporate icons, those who've faced bankruptcy of their 20-year businesses, those who've faced recession-proof jobs, the many too many nurses, coal miners, construction workers, mechanics, pharmacists, real estate agents, all those who've considered their jobs secure.

Some companies are contributing to the communities with funds as well as job-shadowing, such as Levi Strauss with its May Day ("501") efforts.
Outlasting the worst of our lives
Very young I encountered Paramahansa Yogananda and his teachings of ancient shastric scriptures, where I learned not to take deference to bargain-searching or bargaining, learning to be cognitive with regards to all of life's opportunities, learning that every moment is a blessing, sometimes in disguise.

I know that we all still face having to budget for food and to find affordable shelter. I'm not saying each and every one of us will be responsible for fixing the world's disparity anymore than we will all be capable of making the planet all green and bringing back the polar icecaps; likewise, we'll all determine our responsibility yet without necessarily being accountable for the poverty situations in each of our communities.

As long as we stay isolated from our world, no one is of any help to the world in which we belong.


08 April 2009

How a strange needy situation happens

The guy in the suit stabbed Bobby, the guy who knew Bobby wasn't really a woman.

When we ask ourselves how we've ended up in such situations that we have to ask others for help, it's time that we looked at the bigger picture. No matter what we know is reality.

An ambulance rushed Bobby to St. Francis Hospital's Emergency Room. The guy who stabbed Bobby has not yet been found; "just another guy in a suit" was the description from a passerby who last saw him flee down Market Street chasing him toward Citicorp Center and watching him disappear in the crowds around Sansome and Sutter.

Societies know how grievances work and how balances of power work. Some of the neediest complain to no avail and some of the greediest complain to no avail. Some of us just seem useless.

Bobby would have discretionary rendezvouses in the financial towers or in the boutique hotels where the sex trade flourishes.

Just business as usual, that's how a strange needy situation happens.

Bobby was often working her corner in the financial district near ETrade or near the Fidelity digital ticker. She'd worked the Tenderloin yet had tired of the destitute and weary. She'd decided to maintain at Market and First, near Sansome, where all business meets the western frontier. She had her regulars.

And her business flourishes.
What we all know all too well
What she knew, according to two guys drinking at the Sutter Street Station saloon, one of whom who claimed to have written attributions about Bobby in his blog, was not easy to dismiss. How we discard people, and it's just business. How the one guy could flippantly write about Bobby without talking about the nature of the crime troubled me.

These two had been S.F. Chronicle staffers, and they had recently, so they claimed, been writing for the New York Times; seemingly sidetracked―although I knew they were speaking of society's rejective tendency―they told me about Bobby after describing a journalist's colony instituting charity for the diversity of our culture's most conflicted, showing how there was medical help or social concern for the neediest.

Even with people like Bobby, who many would say her needs were simply a matter of choice, not a necessity. Wanting to escape the reality of one's life rather than confronting one's demons and misunderstandings. We've all had our associations with escapism (52nd S.F. International Film Festival charitable contributions to the needy as an example―now, who's sidetracked?―much of it being escapism for the escaped; you have SFSU's disputes of the recent homeless count for The City's federal money allowances, like arguments of Macintosh and Windows, disputably in the eye of the beholder, there are always going to be those survive the worst, or like San Francisco's Paul Avenue cleanup of the homeless campground near the rail tracks, folks who couldn't fit in at shelters), and yet we deny our need of a place to get away from the world.

Likewise, we still need those who are the least wanted. Even among the Progressive's agenda of diversity, we find the dismissiveness: some aren't able to accept that there are transgenders across the U.S., counted among the homeless, the neglected, the loathed, the least of concern; there were those who know what it is to be destitute and deprived who themselves couldn't care less.

It hardly matters how San Francisco reacts to the saddest news, the incessant crime, the mundanity of kidnappings, the business profitings as usual (even the most powerful know of a list of banks receiving bailouts, the same bailouts destroying the U.S. economy), and how the world seems to just now be awakening to what was the same as it ever was.

Bobby had her means.

Old men. Old cultures. Old habits. No matter how strange, some realities perpetuate, despite resistance of the real world.
When we pretend we don't know the real story
How we ever came to such circumstances to get over the historical reference comes to be a human extravagance overcoming the modern contrivance (once we feel we believe our truth, we come to feel that we can convince anyone of the same truth, however much such a story departs from reality). We have another tendency to retrieve whatever we believe is our prerogative.

We have a Constitution. Despite the 27 amendments, there is still the foundation. Whoever believes we have no hope must face responsibility, to have respect for what has survived despite resistance to such foundations for change and for indivisibility.

Respect has a lot to do with hope.

Bobby had voted. She had the consternation of reconciling differences, whether differences even matter. She had enough years on her to know how to resolve street issues with regards to her history. Yet there was reality. She had to sleep at night. She couldn't at the city shelters. She was treated as if she were a man. She couldn't, even among the working realities that gave her her sustenance, get any allowances for her situation. She'd come to believe like the rest of us. In Obama. In history. In belief in America. That we could survive any affliction, any intolerance, any desperation.

Bobby knew which part of the city allowed her to sleep.

Privacy. Where no one invades or defiles you.

Any child would know. Yet there are still among us adults who avoid the intolerance that breeds the loathing, feeding the cultural depravity.

Meeting up today to catch up on all that's happened in her recent life, Bobby reacted to the television news account, to the suitcase dumped in the pond; she didn't have to be eight years old, again.

We both knew about the worst kinds of child abuse, Bobby long before me and me, having grown up with the Polly Klaas legacy having been from from Petaluma, seeing how such tragedy changed public awareness across the U.S., knowing that what Bobby knew went beyond parentage, linkage, umbrage.

As I'd listened to us in the bar, I realized there are those even in San Francisco who couldn't or didn't care in the least why Bobby deserved sympathy or plain human decency of caring.

What had happened six months before, and had culminated in the historical leadership epiphany and change just this year, with Obama, was helpful. What had happened to Bobby just six days before, and had culminated in no arrests, just more tragedy, was no epiphany. Bobby didn't have to have any Constitutional law background. She'd had enough street repercussions. Just in the last year alone, Bobby had been assaulted three times, once almost fatally.

She'd known what to know, what she'd avoided or circumvented.

Our U.S. Constitution has its foundations and the Sixth and Eighth articles provide for something we sometimes take for granted. Habeas corpus. Facing our accusers. We must never take for granted what we are, who we are, what we have become. That no one can take from us.
Life's a short story
Everyone knows a woman. By face. By presence. By a smell, or, if I may be so bold, a fragrance.

Bobby had told me one time about her life. We had emptied glass after glass. My heart's been broken enough in my lifetime to know presence. I heard her story and became a friend, without strings or reservations, without reasons or excuses, without illusions. There were these guys who'd one time broken into our conversation, when Bobby suddenly left, disturbed. They thought they could give us, or me, guidance. Of a different perspective.

Bobby had told me silly stories. Told me grief. Told me about American truth. How we must know redemption if we are truly to know reconciliation.

Diversity must have its way to change what matters.

To us all.

In the familiarities of America, we understand privacy, freedom, and value. Whether we admit we love or refuse to love.

We have a consternation about those who fight.

Else why do we have rights for what we have fought.

Our fathers and brothers and mothers and sisters understand. Justice prevails as long as those who stand up prevail.

I think that's why hope sustains people like Bobby, and what provides us with parentage when we have some disparate linkage with blood, roots, reasons, to what matters. We have what is us. Especially when linkages are long gone. Or gone to whatever we can retrieve.

Bobby's parents disowned her and all that she believed, as soon as she actually spoke out.

This morning, after I left the bar, I later found Bobby, at another bar, Chieftain's; I wasn't to have any newer, better perspective beyond the usual sense of intolerance.

We ended up leaving there, going out to the Bayview district to consider some projects (I know there are some people who always find creative ways to reuse goods):Bobby will be alright. Maybe the police might actually catch the guy. Maybe we'll have a use for what we continue to discard.


17 March 2009

What twittering does ("face value") for the poor and disenfranchised

America's average attention span allegedly has had its 15 seconds of available airtime. By summer 2009, television will no longer be as freely available a distraction as we have come to accept.

What passes for daily survival in the poorest parts of America, evident in San Francisco's North Beach, Chinatown, Tenderloin, SoMa and Mission central districts as just a microcosmic epitome, is small comfort. Soon taken, gone as modern opiate, blasted into the nether regions of the collective interest spectrum, like everything else, scarce.

People will soon require a tuner as means to get the TV signals, due to federal mandates for freeing up the airwaves for emergency services and wireless technology. The government gave out coupons by which people could claim the tuners for free; however, there were restrictions. Even the restrictions lacked reason. Nothing's ever for free.

Perhaps without TV, there's more time for upset, of which there's never a lack.
Without distraction, what will the poorest do?
Just as the poor wonder what's left to them, what goes better with no TV than no breakfast cereal? Because that's gone, too.

News for those needing food came this week with surprises, what with what Kellogg donated to S.F. Food Bank. Since Michael Phelps picture had been on its cereal boxes, with Kellogg feigning their endorsement, people were getting what usually never gets to such outlets, since it's too expensive; the real shock came when the still full boxes turned up on eBay (spoofs also provided fodder for the multitudes).

We forget what happens with the media until we become its victim, as Michael Phelps experienced going from eight Olympic medals hanging around his neck to learning about the albatross of his indiscretion, photographed, of him with a bong.

Most of his sponsors had stood by him. Not Kellogg. Phelps tells the public how he regrets his mistake, how he has no control over how the media's use of such indiscretions is out of his control, how he continues to swim. Time will tell whether history remembers his accomplishments or his indiscretions.

So celebrity continues to be the distraction, while the U.S. continues with grim reminders of being victims of AIG and the Bernie Madoff swindling hordes.

Sometimes it takes satire to blow the whistle on the talking heads of finance, as we saw when Jon Stewart interviewed CNBC's "Mad Money" financial entertainer/journalist Jim Cramer. Everyone it seems has had to endure the repetitive view of the clip from the Daily Show 12 March 2009. "I understand that you want to make finance entertaining, but it's not a f---ing game," Stewart told Cramer.

How such aggravation prevents serious inclinations of repercussions only makes us forget what we can do about the real harm. There's always twittering.
What more will be taken away?
Counteracting the distractions or their lack, ironically, is more victimization.

Blessings barely serve to hinder travesties abounding across the twittering world. Some wastes we don't want to know.

With recent rains this last month came wildflowers sprouting in the spring's greening hills. We'll forget the fact that the water's main use goes to agribusiness and utility companies using the resources for profit.

Past schemes of nepotism may have undone what hope can regenerate. We can only believe we may not soon heal what toxic assets that the past created. Though we may not have much, we still have life.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, in an interview on "60 Minutes" (aired Sunday), said that the U.S. recession will likely end this year, and that a recovery would hinge on the health of financial markets. "The lesson of history is that you do not get a sustained economic recovery as long as the financial system is in crisis," Bernanke said.

Somehow we'll manage to distract ourselves, twittering away and frittering away the small scraps that remain, making the most of what we've got.


10 March 2009

Homelessness and writers examined: enthusiasm of perseverance is infectious, unless unfairness prevails

With today's economic collapse, as more and more of us fail to make a living, we look to those with real gifts who've often questioned why they can't make more of a decent living. Everyone's looking for answers to economic survival, especially us writers.

Faced with being homeless, we know the characterization of most homeless who've become homeless while grappling with addiction, depression, and some with jail time.

Many of us have gotten used to living paycheck to paycheck, and recalling better times. Now we're lucky to have the paycheck. Typecast as losers, those who are facing poverty know their place, rejected, resented and rebuked. As we try to turn our lives around to a sense of prosperity that we once had, we use whatever we can to rise above the squalor in which we find ourselves cast.

We don't like wasting anyone's time.
Homeless writer's reality's not atypical
Some of us who are writers know what it's like to have our time wasted.

Most people rarely know about writers that we're in it for the love, such that we would suffer low pay, endless rejection and multiple side jobs, merely to follow our intent to make points of significance.

People often tend to be envious yet resentful of the fact we can express anything of value, and so we're cast as just being blowhards. And people wonder why a select few writers get so rich, which makes me wonder what happened to the myth of starving writers, a reality I've always known as no myth.

J.K. Rowling, James Patterson, Danielle Steele, Stephen King and others can attest to the real rewards: not every writer dies rich and happy.

Writers are always going to be the ones foraging, scrimping, avoiding discouragement and then enduring the disparaging stigma of being failures. Writers aren't always just seeking attention. Often they're genuinely needing to share their gifts for gathering and providing information. Rejection is a familiar experience.

Most of my life, I've used cooking work to make a living, especially when writing work wasn't available, or augmenting writing work to get a little more ahead of the game (in San Francisco, restaurants now struggling must contribute to health benefit plans for their employees, to ensure for providing the necessities that few of us, individually, can afford; I've been wanting such luxuries most of my life, often having to pay for most medical expenses out of savings or on credit). Even cooking work is hard to get, competitive and beyond demanding.

Over this last few years, I've seen the gradual demise of opportunities and the consequential reduction of decent survival standards.

Foreclosure rates across California this last year have had up to 500 people a day losing their homes.

Coupled with massive job cuts that have seen one in ten workers laid off, many people who once enjoyed a middle class existence are now forced into third world conditions.
Rage seethes in an unending darkness
During the last year, I've come to know there are those of us who don't see the figurative daylight in the economic crisis.

For some of us, hanging out on street corners in paroxysmal blathering, frittering away the time we could be out finding work with seeking friends or annoying strangers, apoplexy has been the only comfort. Losing our rights to vote can bring us to such desperate action.

Our outrage has its reasons, as one woman found who lost her home recently to the FDIC. Banks have not had such failure tendencies since the 20th century's Depression.

Imagine how it feels to many of the eldest among us who must experience an even worse looming of a 21st century Great Depression.

America has begun to seem like the pictures we see of refugee camps in Third World countries.

People survive how they can. They form communities where they can, such as Tent City in Sacramento (a gathering of tents, lean-tos and shanties pitched on the wrong side of the tracks just east of Midtown, near the American River, where the old city dump used to be; Oprah has just put the camp in the spotlight, although its presence has been an ongoing nuisance to neighbors, its recent influx is what gives the inhabitants there the attention), Dignity Village in Portland, Oregon (a growing community of chronically homeless and recently impoverished folks whose members have their own democracy and civilities to create order), and "Nickelsville" in Seattle (named after the mayor, Greg Nickels, and where residents, Nickelodeons, have established rules ― no smoking, drugs or visitors between 9 pm and 7 am ― and set up an arbitration council to mediate disputes; they have nightly gatherings around barrel fires to conduct "rights and responsibilities" assignments).

Even Warren Buffett wants to know where the $50 trillion of investments vaporized in markets worldwide in less than a year's time.

It's like an idea, about which we're speculating its value with strangers, often what we writers regularly do.

We forget we're putting into our messages not only our key ideas but all the fine details we think (or insist) are important. We forget about our readers. Even if they read, they skim. They don't see the significance to their world.

Perhaps even saving it for another day, readers'll come back yet they'll have lost the thread or the original idea's trigger, with writers emphasizing like homeless individuals ranting on street corners.

Just as rejection is a common experience for writers, we can also learn to reject the failure. Persevering through a crisis, we writers are able to share how we overcome such adversity.
Links for homeless and writers
With the Web, writers know they can share links to the world:
(For any other resources with appropriate links, please provide as comments!)

04 March 2009

Misanthropes know their homeless solutions fit into their solipsistic Web

Homelessness 101 is a Web 2.0 experience people ought to learn for themselves.

This isn't to suggest living like the homeless must live (in shelters or on the streets). It's not to suggest becoming a whore for homelessness sake. Or suggesting undertaking the desperation and the intolerance such as those who are actually experiencing the incredible survival skills of poverty.

Maybe it could be just to learn the skills used by the church or social workers who help the poor in the 21st century approach.

Sometimes we're oblivious to such a void in our universe.
A world where heuristics engages us
Lt. Col. Joe Posillico, the Golden State Division commander of the Salvation Army here in San Francisco, talked recently about needing help. The Salvation Army hadn't got what they needed in their red kettles from the usual Christmastime bell-ringing. And times have gotten worse with ever more homeless and poor wandering helpless.

Posillico used newspapers, with his message requesting donations due to the overwhelming need. His real support came from the virtual community, the Web response after the help request's online version. The Web has its infinite capacity for private donors. What Posillico got from the intractable print world was like having a red kettle outside an empty bar, a pittance compared to the virtual red kettle of the Web's permissive generosity.

Posillico saw that people online don't want the connection to the homeless; they don't want to be in the church basements, in the welfare offices, in the inner city help centers. Still, they want to help, to assuage some human longing. Homeless could be acquaintances, associates, distant cousins without help.

Such heuristics encourages solutions with a plasticity that we humans have learned we sometimes, for whatever reasons, can't fully engage.

Yet with the postings online come the necessary evil, the public commentary; by its nature, an online news item's open to any remark, and the majority of comments come from a sabotage of negativity ― an avalanche of disparaging, incendiary, agitating consternation ― those who cannot put up with any charity, any compassion, any collection that's offering no return on its investment (save getting a free set of steak knives). Most of the comments seemed to see no risk or hazard in ignoring the problem.

Sure, life would be perfectly lovely if we were always ready, willing and able to endure fulfilling the momentary needs of an indigent streetperson, as if those fulfillments were our enduring of Lazurus.

Often we're too stoic or stubborn. Or too distracted. With a self-absorption beyond expression, although morally conflicted, as if we could actually discover the redeeming value in helping others. Yet won't.

Opportunities pass us without our realizing when we lack the focus or attention to catalyze the world's gifts.

As if we're shy. Or stupid.
What controls our world besides us
Before we know it, misanthropic solipsism has its control over us.

Just as we have had to adapt to modern models, which we have used as life strategy signifiers, we aren't always ready to adapt to change: when we must abandon everything, from homes to making a living to how we educate or reeducate ourselves to having a family and friends, we are suddenly juxtaposed with being needy.

Without using technology's latest tools, most people wouldn't have a clue what to do when encountering someone who's homeless and actually getting them help, anymore than they'd know what to do in that part of the city or that part of the Web where homeless go.

We've grown up with books that have given us linear or hierarchical learning experiences that we might never have imagined 200 years ago.

And we've grown up with TVs and remote controls that have allowed us to have heuristic approaches to our learning (though usually for our relaxation experience), which we might never have imagined 100 years ago. We want what we want and we want it when we want it (usually now). Yet what we really want, and what we really could have, is dependent only on technology to keep pace with our socioeconomic thriving or its lack.

We've now, with 3G wifi radio tools, abilities that we might never have imagined just 20 years ago. Our distraction capability is pervasive.

With PDAs and laptops on their way home from work, commuters put up with compromises of power-hungry devices and eye strain. Much like the optic nerve having millions of fibers transmitting pulses of information to the retina and to the visual cortex of the brain's perception sensors, within its hippocampus and amygdala, we strive to keep up with what we see with what we experience (the cellular operation is after all binary, and a complex process still occurs); we have come to feel we should be able to have what we need forever in the evolving now.

Rather than see media devices as distraction, we have come to consider them as being solutions in our living spaces, enabling us to have freedom, which is essential to our adapting, to our survival, to our imagining beyond the scarcity and adversity we know is no illusion. Yet they could be transporting us, figuratively, literally and metaphorically (when they face the collapse of the economy, the poor must consider alternatives to what they've relied upon to survive).

History shows us as urban land values have increased, once the properties emptied and the buildings were demolished, with the displacement of people who lived in the inner cities where they've found livelihood, that SRO hotels have had exponential increases. Indigents who just can't cope on the streets must traipse from one SRO to the next every month, since there's no place else they can afford. They could no longer move to rural areas, since those have become suburban areas, not accepting anyone.

Families have recently experienced the fact that they could split (along with their belongings in storage or lost and, most significantly, their animals having been given up, adopted, or worse, euthanized). What we're recognizing in societies is lifestyles becoming more fluid, adaptive. Yet we have also become more isolating.

Posillico hopes differently.
What keeps us controlled besides us
In my lifetime, actual slumlords are hard to find, although their properties are as prevalent in the poorest neighborhoods as cockroaches and drug dealers. If you go to the civic bureaucracies to locate a property owner, you're hard-pressed to locate any individual.

In San Francisco, you'll find TNDC and CitiApartments and other entities. You won't find anyone to ask about the problems with which you live, with pest control or leaks or poor security or inadequate heating.

When you do have a property manager or someone to ask about specific fixes or needs, you risk jeopardizing your tenancy. You won't find any Shorensteins or Morgan Stanleys. What you will find are their lackeys who pass on the problems. As property managers, their reality is that they work like clerks for an agitative firebrand. Their negligence is like an act of a poster child, ready to spark any conflict or bias, yet they're someone who you can't scold for their demeanor anymore than you could scold them for their palsy.

Traditionally SROs have been populated by low-wage workers, transient laborers and recent immigrants. Today immigrants still find SROs as some of the only truly affordable housing for the low-pay jobs that await them. In many Tenderloin, Chinatown and Mission SROs, immigrant workers may be found living three or more to a single small room.

Across San Francisco, the poor have no other choices. One of the oldest hotels in San Francisco, The National, next to California's PUC headquarters and across from UN Plaza, its typical rooms are 8x10 feet. Occupants pay $725 per month for a bed, a sink and decent heating; they're lucky to have the distraction of a TV and yet they do have the politically correct wifi convenience, due to the legislative advocacy for its necessity, with which tenants can share their devices. It's likely the nicest affordable property in the city, due to its closeness with City Hall, and its base of tenants.

Such solutions have the watching eye of City Hall, or beyond, as the world watches a world class city manage its small world. Were solutions as evident as the reality principles of videocams and smartphones, what we have for our use is the capability to capture the moment that evades us.

Such an environment is an apt signifier for the news media's customer base: these nearly indigent need the news, to track scarce jobs (in classified ads ― from craigslist or other virtual network postings, which have become increasingly inadequate), to hunt for clothes (clearly bargain basement markdowns, the marketplace having had its loyalty or its sabotaging betrayal, where even the discount stores struggle to compete with rummage/secondhand stores), or the latest distractions (the Web's twitterings point the way to the cultural currents).
The world needs our collective intelligence
Sometimes, only harsh news concerns us.

Posillico hopes differently.

Stability may be missing from the lives of the poor, yet the world they contain in their culture is a nickel, a dime, or a dollar away from getting or losing their daily bread. People need to know, and sometimes they can't afford the current dire news.

Still, they know if they're not working, no matter what the time, that someone else is.

Still, they know at the end of the day, they must compete with the market.

And still, they must keep up with the latest challenge, either for themselves or for their virtual neighborhood.

With the collective intelligence that we have available with the Web, with smartphones, with networks, we can regain that which we have lost, either through indifference or intolerance. We really do live in a very small world.

When we used to loathe the misanthropes among us, consequently avoiding them, we believed their "my country, right or wrong" bullying enough to give them power. Now, with the world getting smaller every day, it is not even about "my world, right or wrong," since the universe belongs to all of us, and we must protect it: someday we'll embrace the fact that climate catastrophes and nuclear proliferation do none of us any good.

Neither does neglecting homelessness.

There must always be something handy to comfort the poor, to show them, to keep them, to help them, out of their empty red kettle void.


25 February 2009

Some of us can't wait much longer ― since it already seems like forever ― for help with America's future

Delivering his first speech to a joint session of Congress, President Barack Obama addressed the economic crisis that we have all inherited.

The occasion was historic, feeling like a State of the Union deliverance. In the House chambers built by slaves in which President Lincoln addressed the freeing of slaves, President Obama wasted no time on diminishing indulgence to his popularity and to get straight with the encumbrance of politics. President Obama was clearly aware of the jubilation of African Americans and, indeed, all Americans, those of us who cannot help but trust him to preside over a republic in a terrible reckoning.

Don't the homeless and the poor well know the predicament?

"We are a nation that has seen promise and peril," he said. "Now we must be that nation again. We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before."

President Obama used his charm while speaking to the nation, smiling, then sternly glaring, framing his points like a cinematographer, pointing his fingers for emphasis, hand-chopping with a deliberate equanimity, then, with ushering gestures of arm sweeps expressing inclusiveness, fully aware of a magnanimity knowing the scope of our dilemma.

"We have lived through an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity, where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter or the next election," he said.

Giving Vice President Joe Biden the responsibility of overseeing the recovery process, everyone in the chambers had to laugh when the president announced the task. "With a plan of this scale comes enormous responsibility to get it right and that’s why I’ve asked Vice President Biden to lead a tough, unprecedented oversight effort, ’cause nobody messes with Joe."

After all, we've spent eight long years not knowing what the federal budget comprises. We need to know who's in charge of its approbation.
Considering the homeless needs
From the just signed Recovery package, we know San Francisco will receive $19.8 million in federal grants to help the homeless and stands to gain a lot more federal funds in the coming months.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development last week announced $1.6 billion in nationwide grants for homeless services, including housing, job training, health care, mental health counseling and substance abuse treatment.

That money has been infused into local governments each February for years. However, this year, San Francisco expects to gain even more due to President Obama's stimulus plan.

The president's plan includes $24 million for pilot programs in 23 cities to expedite funds to house families made homeless by the economic crisis.

Considering the needs, Compass Community Services and Catholic Charities will get the funds to provide rent subsidies for homeless families.

Indeed, seven out of 10 Latino and African-American senior citizens, and six out of 10 Asians, live below the survival standard in California's 58 counties, according to a report that I remember from a 2007 UCLA Center for Health Policy Research socioeconomic study about costs for California citizens living below poverty level.

47% of state residents 65 and older are unable to pay for their basic needs, which means 864,000 seniors, more than half of whom struggle at home alone, often go hungry in order to survive, the study from two years ago claims.

The UCLA report found the most impoverished seniors include single women, seniors over age 75, those living alone, and renters. In San Francisco, over 60% of seniors struggle.

The Elder Economic Dignity Act of 2009, a bill introduced this month by Assemblyman Jim Beall (D-San Jose), calls for the state to continue tracking seniors in poverty using new measurements. Officials have relied on a 1960s federal measure to determine who is above or below poverty. "There are a lot of hungry seniors, a lot of seniors who have suffered economically over the last decade," Beall said. "So to use a measurement that goes back to the 1950s is clearly not appropriate."

Indeed.

Deep disparities also exist for nonwhite elders, some often due to historical injustices that kept minorities from union jobs that offered pensions or steered them to low-paying manual work.

It seems time to change history, not to deny the past, more to change the course of the future. In America, we can do better than we have been doing and our children deserve a better history and a more realistic future.

President Obama and his administration have yet to detail what will happen with banks and housing foreclosures and the credit freeze and savings fragility. We hope there's intention to avoid any jeopardy of further burdens or losses or conflicts while restoring confidence. The world tires of tentativeness.
A good place to avoid that stays in our prayers
Some of America's grief never ceases, some things never change, no matter how much money or attention the problem gets.

Parts of America just never seem to change their course in history.

Some parts of San Francisco attract grief, like the Tenderloin ("TL").

Turk and Taylor, for instance, is a good place to avoid, unless you plan on scoring drugs, possibly getting busted, or maybe even ending up dead from stray gunfire.

The block is among the most violent in San Francisco, accounting for a third of the city's misdemeanors and felonies. Crime overloads the beat cops; dozens of arrests and citations occur on any given day.

Panhandlers, pickpockets, junkies, drunks and dealers cluster on Turk. As soon as cops appear, dealers vanish. They reappear minutes later and their business flourishes.

The busy intersection has a liquor store, a bar, some boarded-up storefronts, and an expensive parking lot. The area acts as a main corridor to central San Francisco, through which everyday several thousand people pass, driving, unaware of the location's attraction.

Nearby, semis regularly clog the flow of cars as roadies unload equipment for shows at the Warfield, Powell cable cars attract hundreds of tourists and a main BART station has thousands embarking.

Arterial traffic from I-280 comes north up Sixth Street, leading people in their cars to the area.

Quite likely, if you're there, you're someone lost trying to find Civic Center or shopping and theaters at Union Square.

"The potential good foot traffic from Market Street takes one look at this street and doesn’t want to come here," a police officer said.

The Turk Street scene is intolerable for any legitimate business. The Dalt, Aranda, Dahlia and Winston Arms residential hotels fail to control their sidewalks. Debris bins, double-parked delivery trucks and empty police vehicles often add to the congestion.

Stabbings and fistfights are common in front of the Aranda. And the Dalt still carries the stigma of the 2003 incident when chaos erupted with three men fatally shot in the lobby, and the assailant shooting himself in his fourth-floor room.

Monday night six people were shot, one fatally, outside the 21 Club. It was reportedly a drug deal gone bad, with several people innocently hanging out, shot, and the suspects fleeing across the Bay Bridge to Oakland. Police found a vehicle, which had been set afire, and the suspects are still at large.

A memorial sits outside the 21 Club, a bouquet of flowers, a Beyonce CD, some Mardi Gras beads, a botanica candle, a sealed DVD of "Almost Famous" and a rain-smeared grief note: "2/23/09 Big Heart, Laisses Les Bon Temps Roulez" (sic).

"Some Louisiana soul in Baghdad-by-the-Bay. Becoming too common in America," I mumbled to Pastor Rogers from the San Francisco Rescue Mission. He'd stopped Ash Wednesday to pay his respects once again. We were part of a small crowd, gathered, numb to the violence, upset by the frequency of the reality.

"And in the TL," Pastor Rogers nodded.

Jim, who owns Grand Liquor on the southwest corner of Turk and Taylor, told me he couldn't count the number of shootings outside his door. He's witnessed, in his 18 years there, that not much changes. "I do my best to hose down the blood off the cement," he said from behind us as we stared somberly at the urban tribute.

Uncertainty in America aside, I'm just glad no one's cueing the string section of Etta James' "At Last" (indeed, its association now forever ties to President Obama and the First Lady dancing at the Inaugural Ball, no longer anything of love's grief: "And here we are in heaven").


21 February 2009

Recovery: force majeur or moral hazard and what we fail to face (on the brink of disaster)

With the federal stimulus, America petulantly yet cynically complains of the inadequacies, fearing how long we must endure the economic malaise.

We want to know what we can do to change the force majeur, without becoming the public's moral hazard, dealing with the ridicule of envy and the ultimate blame for the bigger problem.

We willingly accept our responsibilities, how we must put up with imbalance. We certainly hold to a resilience through our compromise, else we face worse consequences.

Being homeless, we know what's worse: alienation, abandonment and anger beyond love.

However, we remain unsure if America's leadership neglects the complex social chaos that could result if the democratic force and its capitalist systems fail to recover.

We depend on The Recovery, since the alternative, revolution, seems a drastic and untenable solution. Yet not an inconceivable one. Mostly just displeasing and deplorable. America nearly always tires of being hesitant.

In San Francisco, even Mayor Gavin Newsom claims, while campaigning for California governor, saying his agenda has always been about pragmatic solutions to mainstream problems, that his administration has "controlled the homeless population." Revolution then can hardly seem possible when those most likely to be at the core of the uprising have no center, when they are characterized as a population rather than as individuals with a common ground.

Commonality, like the revolution, will likely be televised, yet few will care, much less watch or participate. Unless they believe "Mad Money" (there lies the moral hazard of how the few reap the rewards of compensation, while the many sow, continuing to do all the work of spreading and gathering the resources without compensation; only envy then results, feeding only more fear and resentment, much like what's behind private prisons), the scrutiny will heed only divisiveness and ignorance.
How recovery might work
For the recovery, we might consider the activist forces on whom America depends. They shape change. Consider Greenpeace or MoveOn or how President Obama came to power.

When enough people understand what they need to do, they become the force majeur behind an uncontrollable force.

There is the grassroots network that provides the basis for much of the world's political movement, the Public Interest Research Group (PIRGs), also known as "The FUND." This grassroots force provides the canvassing (door to door or on street corners and public gathering places) and the telemarketing (phone banking or public outreach through chat, IM and email), always on the frontlines, or the phonelines, of social change.

Think of the grassroots force this way: if the blogosphere is the intelligentsia of the nascent progressive movement, these fundraisers are its toiling proletariat. Vital, but nearly invisible; in dire need of empowerment. This issue might not be as glamorous as setting the progressive agenda for the next four years, but it shapes the generation of our activists and affects the health of our grassroots for the decades to come. Started back in the stone ages of networking on college campuses yet now responsible for the election of President Obama, The FUND is the strategy for making America work for the time being.

However, The FUND's management tends to be inaccessible in these grassroots organizations; we may know their faces from the media yet their workforce never sees them. The workforce is told to trust their leaders without having anyone to voice concerns directly, concerns of performance and equality and pay.

CALPIRG's Douglas Phelps tends to surround himself with a bunch of loyal sycophants that, in the words of Attorney General Jerry Brown, "all have those particularly dead PIRG eyes." What's legendary is Phelps' leadership of two key non-profit organizations, Telefund and GCI (Grassroots Campaigns Inc.); from them, Phelps makes millions. They are two privately held businesses that represent the world's largest canvass and phone operation, the basis of the grassroots networking force, enabling change. According to many people with whom I've spoken who've worked the street or the phone banks for these operations, Phelps makes a lifestyle whose basis depends on his own comfort, much to the detriment of his staff and workforce, all in the form of his fear-mongering, humiliation and bullying; yet his minions still worship him, and, meanwhile, the work of activism accomplishes huge results. It's politics like these PIRGs that America uses to fulfill change. Or empty promises.

Opportunity for recovery demands a strategy for change, yet no one seems to have the power to set such direction in progress. We're all willing to work if we just knew what to do.

Chaos depends on change to get us back to America's dream of freedom and sustainability for all of us. Else we remain in chaos.


10 February 2009

What the future holds for the slumdog reality homeless

We rarely consider the children who are homeless.

Those who we can't deny we've forgotten. Or neglected, commonly. As if it's someone else's job.

When we consider homelessness, we think of those begging on the street, selling newspapers we don't want to read, with obscene rants and lifestyles which we unequivocally loathe, the daily dread of malnutrition, shelter routines, potential drug encounters, and worse.

Between 6.5 - 10 million people are unemployed in America, and we know homeless counts will tell us soon how many there are among the unemployed in America, those who simultaneously face sudden adversities.

When we consider homelessness, we don't think of families, those working hard to escape from the predicament.

Numbering among the homeless, I'm grateful to know I've no kids to support. Yet I meet homeless kids on the street who don't know where to turn. They're tired of foster care, they're tired of abuse, they're tired of abandonment. Not that I didn't already know, yet the recent familiarization with slumdog reality informs us all of the 150 million children worldwide who are homeless. For months now, I know I've been barely making a living, by anyone's standards; yet I know I could have a worse life, and I find small comfort in that I've not known the reality of poverty all my life. Yet I know well I haven't recently been contributing to life as I'm used to knowing.

I'm now often reminded poor doesn't get any worse than dirt poor.

All over the world we learn of poverty and, lest anyone doubt, we should know Haiti is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere, with 49% of its people living in absolute poverty. There, I'm reminded the poor know dirt poor.

While recently all of us in America feel desperation and frustration, abandoned by our normal expectations of how to make a living, Haitians eat mud. Mothers buy bags of dirt for about $5, hauled from the mountains presumably, which they blend with butter and salt, letting the cakes sit in the sun to dry for their children to eat.

There in the Caribbean, some of the richest have their investments in the virtual reality of the actual Cayman banks or the hedge funds of the Virgin Islands. That part of the world has Cuba, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, where dire poverty is commonplace among the people that look towards America for hope for their children and families.
Have we forgotten the homeless children?
This year in San Francisco, the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) received 1,500 backpacks full of textbooks and school supplies from Feed the Children, tutoring services and scholarships from Children of Shelters, gift cards and clothes from My New Red Shoes, and $7.6 million from the state of California (more school districts are applying for funds, according to Leanne Wheeler, homeless liaison for the state Education Department). Larkin Street Youth Services (LSYS) has the demographics behind the current reality, understanding there are today 1,623 homeless youth attending SFUSD schools. Organizations like LSYS, Compass, Hamilton Family Center, Raphael House or Children's Village have not forgotten nor neglected the homeless who truly need help.

As our American culture continues to worship celebrities and to esteem the hoity-toity, we feel the compelling urge to hand out awards to those homeless on the street, for Best Original Cardboard Sign, Best Use of Profanity in an Improvised Tirade, Best Track Marks, Best Use of Malt Liquor in a Leading Role.

We forget when we're being condescending. Or degrading. Or patronizing.

Everyone fears their children will eventually disappoint them. Yet we hold in high regard the television images and popular illusions that distract us from our responsibility to holding to such respect.

We forget when some families separate, how the children face foster care while still troubled by the social inequality resulting from prior parental abuse ― physical, sexual or emotional ― as well as severe parental neglect. We may shake our heads when we see the se kids on the street, abandoned, wondering how parents can let such behavior develop in theoir children.

Chances are the children have no homes. They carry around an anger as a shield to hide their abandonment.

We have all learned what we need to do to adapt to the fiscal collapse.

In September 2008 when Lehman Brothers and AIG and Bear Stearns and Morgan Chase gave us the full experience of the credit crisis, how it wasn't just our adjusted rate mortgages or home foreclosures or mounting job losses or the economic impact making us all take long breaths, how we could no longer afford such luxury, how we couldn't customarily insist on conveniences. Before we could even take that long breath and sigh with despair, we had to realize we didn't have the time or the money or the resources. We had nothing.

We've had to accept that we haven't faced the end of the misery and struggles with which we've already long suffered.

Yet we need help. And answers. And hope.

Will children in this chaos know a future without homelessness as a reality? Will their parents or caretakers get the jobs they need? Will the children just be abandoned once again?

When we stop thinking of the homeless as only those we ridicule, those exemplars who disgust us ― the mentally ill, the addicted, the chronic homeless ― then we may know the myriad forgotten, those working in the only deadend jobs they can find, those suddenly homeless, with children.

Investing in these families and their children will build infrastructure as the fiscally responsible ultimatum. If we let these families slide deeper and deeper into trouble, we will pay for it in other ways ― more shelters, foster care, and, eventually, prison.

Neglect has its consequences.

Personally, I'd rather see these children and their families be productive citizens. Else, we will turn into worse than the rest of the world's poverty stricken masses (where the only happiness comes from singing "Jai Ho!").


03 February 2009

Pecking orders prevail with credit crisis

We've all been experiencing the global economy's terrible mess. So have Cory and Fletch; once prosperous, now with shameful credit, they've become used to being urban nomads in San Francisco.

Pride can be a liability, they've learned.

Complexity gets simple, they've learned.

Edges become more and more definite, they've learned.

What was complicated and out of touch, somehow, turns around, quite naturally, and life does comprise its black and its white in the fiscal balance. In the world where we humans have seeming dominion.

Sometimes life only gives us one chance.

A shining moment.

Focus.

One day, while walking San Francisco's Embarcadero, at the foot of Telegraph Hill, Cory saw the wild parrots in flight, a dozen of them circling, finally alighting, nested in one of the date palms. "I wish sometimes I could fly," she said, as we stopped to sit there, wondering about where to live, "cities have become too crowded."

"I wish we could just nest," Fletch retorted. "Sometimes it's just people that get in the way. Politics," he said. He'd liked to argue his systems theories with people, how most anything could be explained by chemistry and physics and numbers. "We're just not thinking about sustainability, like those parrots."

Cory and Fletch had come to be homeless the hard way. They had had an easy, comfortable life.

Having weathered the worst job insecurity of their lives, Cory as a chemist and Fletch as an environmental analyst, they questioned their survival as whether they were the fittest in this crisis. Corporation after corporation posted layoffs and job losses.
Across America, worry remains
Joining Cory and Fletch (in parallel universes), feeling inept, in botched lives, with their dreams collapsed, was most of America.

Cory and Fletch had both lost their jobs in early 2006 and could no longer pay their bills by 2008 with the job market getting more and more bleak. Severance pay and reserves had evaporated with their adjustments. Like everyone with the economy, rising costs and diminishing returns meant learning how to survive not just how to sustain their reality.

Rent, food and utility expenses had Cory and Fletch at their limit.

No longer enjoying simple luxuries (unlike a year before, when they could see a movie or go out to eat perhaps once a month; in years past, such luxuries they'd do on a whim: traveling, investing, discovering the world), suddenly, they were barely able to survive.

With their combined monthly income having dwindled to the point they were paying bills when they could, they would only then come to realize the credit hoax and the problems with their delinquent debt.

They had been swindled using their own credit cards, having not understood the fine print of "universal default fees," the financial percentage rates in their agreements, which fluctuate and rise.

Due to bills paid late, universal default fees kicked in on all their accounts. It would be years before they could recover and repay with the mounting due balance.

Suddenly each month, percentage rates were going higher and higher, and with their overdue liability whose basis had been a form of usury, they could only make minimum due payments on their bills; soon, Cory and Fletch were unable to pay their rent and their utilities. They could barely afford more than $2 per day to eat.

They faced bankruptcy.

Having avoided welfare as an option, it became a reality when they could not afford rent and their belongings went into storage, their only place to live being the one-room SRO flophouses, the hotels scattered across San Francisco. Due to their ravaged credit and the policy of tenancy requirements (evictions became more difficult once they'd established tenancy), they could only stay in one hotel three weeks at a time before having to move to the next hotel. They had become urban nomads.

Once altruistic, they were not used to worrying every moment.
America bounces around its citizenry's future
In their 40s, Cory and Fletch hadn't known such real sacrifice and hardship in their lifetimes. Always paying their taxes, they'd been strong contributors to charities. Now they were seeking aid.

"Get in line," they'd hear. Charity budgets are tightening, they'd learned, with an economy that cannot afford services and resources normally coming from public not private sources.

With no children, they felt fortunate that their health wasn't of any immediate concern. When considering any diagnostic medical procedures, they'd investigated public health options.

"Get in line," they'd hear. Unless they had reasons for indicating any medical concerns, they would have to find a means to pay. Had they had any pre-existing conditions, they faced worse alternative waits.

When the meager EBT ("food stamps") aid became available, they realized their allotment amounted to about $5 per day for food expenses. They found the soup kitchens and the monthly free grocery provisions.

"Get in line," they'd hear. Often the daily lunch lines would be 300-400 people on average, depending on the time of month and other arbitrary budgetary situations; the monthly food giveaways was what had become most overwhelming, since getting there late often meant getting nothing at all.

People are the same everywhere; they can be diabolical, humorous, and they can overcome heartbreak. When struggles happen, true spirit shows: a sense of community or a sense of protectiveness prevails.

Despite the current despair, there is a hope that will not disappear.

When reflecting on their predicament, survival of the fittest for Cory and Fletch depended on how they'd find work, a way to heal their ravaged nest, and regain sustainability for the children they hope to one day have.

"Get in line," they'd hear.


27 January 2009

America's forgotten in their very own census

A count takes place this week of those that America's census knows as homeless.

From Staten Island to San Francisco, from the tent cities to the shelters, under blankets asleep on city streets, in resource centers, jails and hospitals, people will become part of what qualifies for federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funding.

In San Francisco, the 400 volunteers, the city and nonprofit workers, the officials who control the census, they all know they may not count everyone who's homeless.

They may not find some encampments.

Those staying with friends or family may not make the count.

Across San Francisco, in the SRO flophouses, which individuals use for weeks at a time then being forced to move (due to tenancy regulations), some people will not make the tally.

Volunteers came Tuesday evening to the Department of Public Health building (after hearing of the means to get the jobs, since there were initial enticements of pay). They got route assignments, tally notes, flashlights, pens, and instructions on how to spot homeless people, since asking people is against the guidelines that officials established. "Look for shopping carts," a city worker instructed, "anyone sleeping in doorways or alleys." Volunteers rolled their eyes, needing no such clues.

Most homeless are apparent. Yet there are the questionably homeless, don't I well know.

HUD last year provided San Francisco with $18 million in homeless-program funds, accounting for nearly 10% of The City’s homeless-program budget, according to figures provided by Dariush Kayhan, Mayor Gavin Newsom’s homeless-policy director.

Tuesday night’s count may be available in several weeks; 2007 identified 6,377 homeless, up from 6,248 in 2005.

Beyond these figures, the federal government provides little help or direction with its work to scale back poverty. The bailout is still in Congress.
Different kind of homelessness to consider in America
President Obama's first acts in his new leadership were subtle yet significant with respect to changing the course of America's economy, its state of poverty and its growing homelessness.

One of his first was to prevent his administration from lobbyist favors and bribes along with his signing of reinstitution of the Freedom of Information Act, ensuring that there will be access once again to what happens in White House operations, not just to the rich and powerful.

He also named a Director of National Security, Dennis Blair; as the Director of Intelligence, he will be principal adviser to the President, to the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council. Admiral Blair will be responsible for closing down "Gitmo," the Guantanamo prison holding men accused of conspiracy and terrorism (a statement, which he made during his confirmation process before the Senate Intelligence Committee, was a significant change of course for America's critical intelligence concerns: "torture is not moral, legal, or effective").

America is not out of the woods, and everyone understands that there will be problems. We do not expect President Obama to do the hard work alone. We have learned we can't depend on our government. We want to do our part to protect and to build our nation's status.

Yet we wonder when the next catastrophe will arise.

We've wondered for years if we could trust the White House.

Now we wonder if the President is safe in the White House. If his family is safe. Kidnappings, assassinations, and terrorism still have ahold of our national psyche (Googling "Obama assasination" gets over 3 million hits).

Imagine the hatred that exists in places worse than Gitmo, for instance, Supermax, the solitary confinement federal penitentiary in Colorado, where the following prisoners serve time:
  • Matt Hale, a white supremacist who espouses racial holy war, serving time for soliciting the murder of an Illinois federal judge
  • Omar Abdel-Rahman, the notorious "Blind Sheik" mastermind, Mahmud Abouhalima, the Mujahideen leader, and Ramzi Yousef, the Islamic terrorists involved in the 1993 World Trade center bombing
  • Ted Kaczynski, the "Unabomber" loner
  • H. Rap Brown, former civil rights activist, convicted of murdering a Georgia sheriff
  • Anti-government extremist Eric Rudolph, held for the 1996 Olympics bombings in Atlanta, implicated in bombing many other women's clinics and county facilities
  • Zacarias Moussaoui, conspirator in the 9/11 attacks
  • Barry Mills, leading member of Aryan Brotherhood.
Officially called ADX, it's not what one would expect of a place built in the 1990s that houses nearly 500 terrorists, vicious murderers and violent, disruptive escape-prone inmates, most of whom come from other federal penitentiaries. There, unlike most state and federal prisons, where inmates scream for a visitor's attention or proclaim their innocence, not a single major assault against a corrections officer has occurred since the first inmates arrived in 1994.

Conspiracy theorists think that there must be some way to overwhelm the surveillance, the aerial reconnaissance, the radar, the remoteness. Just as they insist President Obama won't last two years in office.

We hope not a chance permits such injustice, that these prisoners are there for the terms of their sentences, some for life. That hope is still alive in America.

There are some people that we like to know where they are.


20 January 2009

Pride, again, in America, stands up, with hope and an amazing grace

Again in America, we have the light of day. We are singing our National Anthem, reciting our Pledge of Allegiance, practicing our Constitution.

A new form of social grace stands, without us having to be asked to stand.

As millions of Americans experience the pride of the Inauguration of President Barack Obama, we, he says in his majestic Inaugural Speech, the "risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things — some celebrated but more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us up the long, rugged path toward prosperity and freedom," we must "pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America."

From the steps of the Capitol Building, across the Great National Mall, in a crowd stretching from the Lincoln Memorial beyond the Washington Monument, among over two million Americans standing for hours in the bitter cold, there were many proud to watch this humble man take an oath and then to listen to this inspiring man we can all with certainty call our President.

I was, on this bright, balmy Tuesday morning, January 20, 2009, standing in San Francisco Civic Center across from City Hall, watching a simulcast of the Washington D.C. ceremony. Here, as across America and around the world, men and women, young and old, black, white, brown, red, yellow, purple, united, some cheering, some silently sobbing, some numb, some smiling, all of us were in awe of the magnitude of an historical moment.

A nonprofit concert organizer, NextArts, arranged the Civic Center event, asking only that people bring donations of socks and underwear for the homeless. Amnesty International set up a booth near a giant screen with red, white and blue banners across from City Hall. A booth for throwing shoes at a Bush target was available near the Pioneer Monument; eccentric Frank Chu was there with his 12 Galaxies sign, taking off his shoes.
America is different now in the world
Here in San Francisco as all across America, we were experiencing the gift of grace, the promise, the dream, the realization of hope.

No canaries froze in their cages this Inauguration in Washington D.C. (as for Theodore Roosevelt's only inaugural, when it was freezing cold and they were there for their amusing twittering and chirping for citizens), no doves released (as for George W. Bush's second, as a symbol of peace and prosperity), no pigeons killed mercilessly (as for Richard Nixon's first, for his parade route, when a special toxin was sprayed on trees, to prevent any undue messiness, and instead the pigeons and many other birds littered the sidewalks, dead from the poison).

No creed of separation, no indifference of belief, no doubt of danger and dread, nothing could keep us from affirming the audacity of President Obama's magnanimity and unquestioning fortitude.

We stood for President Obama's taking of his oath (even as we laughed politely when Justice John Roberts could not provide the correct wording, at first, while Obama waited politely for the words to be said for him to follow), we stood for prayers (even when we did not practice faith and watched as others mouthed the words by heart), we stood for the flag (even when we have had doubt in its meaning over the last eight long years).

"The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small," President Obama proudly says, "but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. And those of us who manage the public’s dollars will be held to account — to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day — because only then, can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government."
Pride and an audacity to which we can and must hold
Across America, we are proud to call ourselves Americans.

Again.

We can use our passports without incrimination or disdain or shame.

We can praise our leaders.

We can hold to "these truths to be self-evident," that all of us are equal.

Across the world, we have seen frustration, doubt and despair, and its replacement by a resolve to cooperate, to seek commitment, to make amends.

For fear and intolerance have held us too long in the imprisonment, the slavery, the fighting, over all of which we can rise up and stand strong, with confidence and hope. We can and we will have the future.

"For we know," President Obama says, "that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter, stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace."

For with freedom, President Obama reminds us, comes responsibility.

In Gaza, yesterday, Israelis and Palestinians called for a cease fire in the violence ravaging a small part of the world that many fear could erupt in all-out world war. Peace has come, perhaps, because of a new power in place, or perhaps because of responsibility.

In the Congo and Rwanda, a conflict continues over precious resources, with lives and blood lost to those who claim their rights to destroy for an old way of power that can no longer stand, in our new light of day.

In America, the men and women and children who walk or sleep or work on the streets, those who are without homes, without food, without hope, all can now face a future with accountability, respect, and trust in overcoming such adversity. A powerful few can no longer abide, simply because of legacy, while the many have no homes, no work, no future.
Celebrating America is due as a guiding demand
The last few days of celebrations in Washington D.C. brought the celebrity talent of everyone from Bono to Springsteen to Cher, performing their popular anthems for their new-found belief in America.

This morning I listened to Aretha Franklin sing "My Country 'Tis of Thee," in her glorious grey dress and a towering hat to accentuate her mettle. The Queen of Soul provided the fitting presence to the Inauguration's historical eminence.

Yo-Yo Ma (on cello), Itzhak Perlman (on violin), Anthony McGill (on clarinet), and Gabriela Montero (on piano) performed "Air and Simple Gifts" (a John Williams composition for the occasion), exacting the foundation of history in the making.

The San Francisco Boys Chorus and San Francisco Girls Chorus had already ensured history with their heavenly mastery with "An Exhortation," whose lyrics are from Obama's election-night acceptance speech.

Elizabeth Alexander read from her poem for the occasion, "Praise Song" (she is one of only a few poets to be part of a Presidential Inauguration; the others, of course, were Robert Frost, who recited "The Gift Outright" from memory at John F. Kennedy's 1961 inaugural, after failing with "Dedication" because of the sun's glare making him unable to read that poem that he'd created for the occasion, James Dickey read "The Strength of Fields" at Jimmy Carter's 1977 inaugural gala at the Kennedy Center, Maya Angelou read "On the Pulse of Morning" at Bill Clinton's 1993 inauguration, and Miller Williams read "Of History and Hope" at Bill Clinton's 1997 inaugural). Alexander's words are testament to what Obama's words gave us, a call to serve others, in order to make America, once again, a strong and brave home and a guide once again for the rest of the world.

"Say it plain: that many have died for this day," Alexander, 46, read, speaking of "love that casts a widening pool of light, love with no need to pre-empt grievance," of having love "beyond marital, filial, national." Just as the unthinkable has happened in the past, she seemed to impart, anything remains possible now: "In today's sharp sparkle, this winter air,/any thing can be made, any sentence begun/on the brink, on the brim, on the cusp,/praise song for walking forward in that light."

Near the end of President Obama's historic Inaugural Speech, he states: "Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may not be new. But those values upon which our success depends — honesty and hard work, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism — these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths."

A man whose heritage has been witness and forbear to struggle, to slavery, to poverty, this man has taken an oath today to which we can be proud to salute him, to honor him, and to follow him, with grace.

No one has asked us to stand up for our pride. We do so out of instinct, with an amazing grace.


13 January 2009

Sleeping on the street and Street Cred 101, what we all could learn, just to survive

In cardboard boxes, just the right size, folded perfectly into a canopy underneath an overpass, out of sight from predators and police and passersby, two homeless find their safe night's sleep. Katie and Jess had stapled transparent polyurethane to the inner core, so that they could stay dry. They stack it with all their worldly belongings in their makeshift luggage cart, wheeling their life around San Francisco.

All they need is a place to get clean, along with a sturdy sense of resilience or perseverance or confidence that they'll survive.

Making it to Civic Center, they watch the Falun Gong and Tai Chi practitioners worshiping their craft in the plaza. They await the Main Library's opening, where they'd planned to go inside, in shifts, since they cannot bring their cart and all their belongings with them.
Invisible stress erupts and pervades
Crowds grow, with everyone anticipating the same daily routine at the Main Library, trying to grab a sink or a toilet or mirror or a computer terminal before anyone else.

A fight breaks out over territory, a place in the queue, trivialities about who gets to sit in the cherished spots. Gestures become provocations. Vulgarities become spewed poison. Frustrations become conflicts. Toxic stress is in the open. Some street people just want to get drunk and high in the early morning and that's how they live all day long, every day, hunkered in to deep depression. Whoever interrupts their progress gets what's left of a piece of their mind. Some say it's indicative of the general homeless problem, how a high percentage of most people on the street spend their days in worthless misery.

Beat cops cross the street from City Hall. Jess motions with a nod to Katie that it's time to leave. Katie shakes her head, keeping her civility and respect. "Let the beef happen, it'll play out," she says with a dignity of resolve.

"I just want to have a day when stress isn't the only reality," Jess says.

"Hon, you did get some sleep last night, I could tell. You weren't snoring."

"Yeah. Not like the shelters," Jess remembers, "guys coughing like some tuberculosis ward, snoring like it's a contest to see who's the loudest, talking gibberish. And those metal frame beds with the two inch high mats, the fear of lice, the bodies smelling of piss and sweat and somethin' close to death." He watched the cops approach the guys arguing.

"That old man got to you the other night," Katie recalls. "He might be dead." She tries to get eye contact with Jess as he looks away.

She and Jess had split up the other night, four nights ago, so they could have decent warm showers at the MSC-South shelter. Her downstairs with the women, Jess upstairs with the men, they'd been lucky to get in a place together, and their cart of belongings was safe, stored at the 150 Otis resource center.

An old man had been drunk in the men's dormitory at MSC. He'd wreaked of grain alcohol, urinating all over himself and the area where he lay. Jess had been trying to rest in a bed only 15 feet away, when the lights came on, with paramedics arriving to take care of the man, to take him away, since staff had felt he was a hazard, to himself and everyone else. Two days later, word spread how he'd died. So he had smelled of death, likely his liver giving out, his body no longer able to withstand the toxins from the grain alcohol, which he'd been likely consuming out of habit for years, likely only prolonging his life by sheer will, drinking all day long from waking until he passed out.

"Just an old coot," Jess says, cocking his head, shaking off the memory like he could still smell that night's stench. Staff afterwards had tried to clean up the mess, with spray cleansers and bleach; the stench lingered until the next morning, with a gag reflex close to many of the homeless men's senses. Everyone walked around with an expression of disgust, their nostrils flared, trying to breathe only through their mouths, unable to get the fresh air they needed to suppress the instinctual choking, swallowing, and the compulsion to vomit.

The cops have had to interfere with the altercation between three guys while they were waiting for the library doors to open. The guys had seemed to settle down for fear of arrest. Katie watches as the calm allowed Jess to breathe some relief. She looks across the street at the Falun Gong movements. The day's stress seems to disappear as suddenly as it seemed to have had a pending doom.
Stress becomes undeniable
"Give me just a few minutes," Katie says as the doors open. "I just want to use the restrooms real quick. Then you can." She joins the crowds, as they all are shuffling their feet through the doors.

"Take your time," Jess says, "I got the paper to read, the Sudoku to do if you're too long." He waves her off and opens the news, reading of the coming inaugurations, the Israeli/Hamas chaos, and the latest economy slump irritableness.

Katie is off, thinking about sleep, how little they'd been getting, all the walking they did, all the emotional and physical stress they endured. Being homeless had become hard work. Trying to disengage was a constant battle. Having any useful sleep was a triumph, having to put up with snoring being not even the least of their problems, with traffic noises, sirens, strange voices shouting nonsense, all manner of disturbances never allowing them to sleep through the night. She thought of Jess and his tendency to vigilant yet stoic guarded sleep, watching over the both of them.

One of the security guards ushering the crowds into the lobby yawns and stretches like he's just awoken. "I don't know if I slept a wink either last night," Katie says, off-handedly.

The guard recognizes Katie, smiles and nods, politely acknowledging her comment, and near blushes at his yawning gesture, like he had no reason to show any lack of refreshfulness compared to her; they'd talked, so he knew her circumstances.

"You need your sleep," he says. "Especially out on the streets." Several people look up, assessing Katie, since she doesn't look like the typical homeless, the unbathed, the ragged, the disheveled.

"Least I got some. You look like you need some coffee," Katie jokes.

She uses the restrooms, scouts the computer terminals, seeing several open, books one for the hour, scans the daily racks of newspapers, and goes back outside. Jess is deep in some story of the juvenile gangs having gotten justice for their "street cred" murder (their vengeance earning them only murder charges and imprisonment until they're 25 years old). "Your turn," Katie says, "and if you want, there's a computer booked. Up on the fourth floor, number 410."

He looks up and sighs. "Yeah, sorry, yeah, I'll use the computer, maybe check on that job for next week." Jess checks his email frequently along with craigslist and other local job boards, sometimes with futility, due to the competition for jobs and the desperation he feels when he hasn't been able to get sleep, or to stay clean and to have laundered clothes for an interview. So he tries to get any work where it's even just temporary, like the job next week, cleaning up a house for a property owner to rent to some new prospect. "Sorry, babe,"he says. "Just distracted, just reading about some 14-year-old girl, and the gang that shot her, they'll get their sentences in juvenile court later this week. Happened up Potrero Hill last year, near where we sleep."

"That's comforting," Katie says. She tucks her hair behind her ears and out of her face. "Any reason for us to worry?"

"No more than anywhere else," Jess replies. "There's been two murders in the City so far this year. Stabbings. Inconsequential wherever we go. Just have to be wary."

Survival to them wasn't just about waking hours, mostly it came down to putting up with stress, watching their backs wherever they go, and hoping for good sleep.

"Yeah. Even of cops," she says, thinking of Oscar Grant and the BART cop fiasco. "Don't be too long, sweetie," she says.


08 January 2009

New voices for diversity and grassroots giving life to real hope in San Francisco

A 2009 Board of Supervisors inauguration saw its first Chinese community activist elected as President with David Chiu, who takes over for the outgoing President Aaron Peskin, who had represented the same district for which Chiu serves.

With the support of the administrative end of its government, San Francisco, famous for its magnanimity and its respect and pride in people, may see its voices count at the grassroots level and across the diversity of the City. We can only hope.

Over the last two centuries, Chinese Americans have contributed to building San Francisco with civility, cooperativeness and tolerance for racism, despite its people never having a say in politics. Recent years have seen scandals here that have made for as much accountability or its lacking for the public welfare as in any other governmental body. Yet the people have a sense of preeminence. We can only hope.

What the homeless can expect is new hands at the helm. If fresh blood can give new life to existing problems, San Francisco like the U.S. may have credible optimism in its striving to keep itself alive. We don't want to see the fact of homelessness become a lifestyle anymore than we want to see the nation facing economic collapse. Anymore than we want to see history's worst chapters replay. We can only hope.

Members taking their oath of inauguration were Eric Mar (District 1, representing the Richmond), David Chiu (District 3, North Beach, Russian Hill, Chinatown), Carmen Chu (appointed to District 4, the Sunset after former Supervisor Ed Jew was charged with corruption and lying about his residence), David Campos (District 9, the Mission, Bernal Heights and Portola) and Mark Avalos (District 11, Excelsior, Outer Mission), all sworn in for their first full term.

Also taking the oath were Supervisors Michela Aliot-Pier (District 2, Marina), Ross Mirkarimi (District 5, the Fillmore, Western Addition, Haight-Ashbury), Chris Daly (district 6, Tenderloin, Financial District, SoMa, Treasure Island), Sean Elsbernd (District 7, West of Twin Peaks neighborhoods), Bevan Dufty (District 8, Castro, Noe Valley, Glen Park, Diamond Heights, Duboce Triangle, Mission/Buena Vista Heights), and Sophie Maxwell (District 10, Potrero Hill, Bayview-Hunters Point, Visitacion Valley, Portola/Silver Terrace, Dogpatch, Little Hollywood, Portola).
Changes of faces like direction of winds in San Francisco politics, yet familiarities remain
A huge crowd had assembled in the chambers and the overflow area of the North Light Court of City Hall. Even the North Light Court had begun to bustle. The hum sounded like a foghorn.

Mayor Gavin Newsom made a rare appearance, long an adversary of the previous Board due to politics and personalities straining relations. The legislative chambers had many heads of government attending the historic meeting―District Attorney Kamala Harris, Fire Chief Joanne Hayes-White, newly elected School Superintendent Carlos Garcia.

After a moment of jocularity during roll call, when both Chiu and Chu answered "present" to what sounded like their names, Superior Court Judge James McBride swore in the newly elected (and re-elected) members, and Clerk Angela Calvillo then opened nominations for Board President.

Daly nominated himself, Dufty nominated Maxwell, Campos nominated Mirkarimi, Chiu nominated Avalos, and Avalos nominated Chiu.

With the Board’s moderate-to-conservative wing, those aligned with Mayor Gavin Newsom (Alioto-Pier, Elsbernd and Dufty) were behind Maxwell (she had seemed to be the strongest contender for being Board President, due to her community support and the respect by many on the Board who often don't even agree with the moderate positions she takes; yet she is a "driving force pushing for accountability in local government and increasing economic development opportunities, and, as the only African American on the Board, Sophie is committed to implementing true social and environmental justice principles in the local governance," as the City's Website states).

Mirkarimi had support yet most know he has aspirations as Mayor ("another Matt Gonzalez," many claim).

Campos had support too, although on the fourth round, he announced that, in the interests of reaching a consensus, he would be switching his vote to Chiu and urging others to do the same.

Mar supported the move, wanting to "break the gridlock," telling his colleagues: “To have the first Chinese-American as president of the Board of Supervisors would be an historic occasion.”

Alioto-Pier then gave a speech arguing for the importance of female leadership on the Board.

Public testimony had no determinate leader although the loudest sentiment of cheers was for the progressives, not Maxwell, more the moderate/progressive.

Before the seventh round of voting, Avalos announced that he was removing his name from nomination, so in that round, Daly supported Chiu, as did all the freshmen and Mirkarimi, who gave Chiu the sixth vote he needed to win the Board's presidency. When Mirkarimi cast the final vote, the Board chambers and North Light Court reverberated with applause.
What's unexpected is still no surprise
"This is a little unexpected," said Chiu, as he took the Board President chair. "I would have been honored to serve under any of my colleagues."

Chiu is a freshman, yet with his involvement in the business community and at the same time with the grassroots networks, he brings a resounding sense of unity to city government. The ability to determine who sits on Board committees is an incredible power, and Chiu's chair appointments of those committees will show the direction of his leadership, particularly on the budget and land use committees. We may see few surprises.

Whether Chiu follows Peskin's allegiances will be the ultimate telling of the direction San Francisco takes. At his last meeting, Peskin set up a special election in June to look for ways to raise new revenue to balance the $576 million deficit, almost half the City's $1.2 billion in discretionary funds. How Chiu politicizes that election will be worth watching.

Mayor Newsom's appearance in the Supervisor's chambers, to show his support for a Board that faces its most precarious and cutting budget for operations that San Francisco has ever seen, signals a cooperativeness. Working with the business community, he and Chiu may even make strides towards balancing needs of the public welfare against balancing demands for corporate welfare. Such conflicting needs may come down to improving business with corporate taxation or cutting public resources. The dilemma will show how politics proves its meddle, whether it's business as usual or the people actually getting their due.

"We have the capacity, the ingenuity and the spirit to solve this," Newsom told the Board, looking painfully alone as he stood in the chambers. "It's going to take all of us working together. It's in that spirit that I am here. The mid-year solution―difficult and painful as it is―is the easy part. The difficult part comes in the next four months."

After the meeting, Mayor Newsom had a press briefing concerning the budget, which he did not attend, yet where Controller Ben Rosenfield and Budget Director Nani Coloretti tried to provide spare details.
Across San Francisco, a clamor for progressives echoes calls for new prosperity
Socially, the homeless have no means to involve themselves politically besides their activist contrarians like SFConnect and Coalition on Homelessness. One of my associates with the Coalition on Homelessness was irate as I encountered her watching the Board's initial 2009 meeting, especially when I was apprising her of the crisis that 150 Otis alone seems to manage. She was immediately on the phone to the offices for Dariush Kayhan, the mayor’s Homeless Policy director, trying to help me get some words of encouragement to the people I know who gather daily at 3 PM. These are homeless people who are waiting for their slim chance at a low lottery number for grabbing up the overflow no-shows of nightly beds. This hopeless waiting all day needed attention.

After the Board of Supervisors meeting adjourned, I knew there would be celebrations of each member's constituencies and supporters in their offices. Prior to these political parties, I hurried to 150 Otis to spread news of hope in The City's future for change in plans.

Generally outside of word of mouth, homeless have no way of spreading the word, and they could care less who the Board President is; however, I told what I knew would be important to them―systems changing to provide faster access to beds―and then I returned to City Hall.

Weaving through each Supervisor's office crowd, visiting Mar and Mirkarimi, Dufty and Maxwell, Daly and Chiu, I heard again and again how welcoming the mood was for change. There was toasting. Comraderie. Scruples. Direction. Concern. Free food and drinks. Congratulations. Warmth. Quite the opposite of what I had just experienced not even seven blocks away at the destitute 150 Otis crowd.

People talked of how they would miss Tom Ammiano and Aaron Peskin and Jake McGoldrick (despite how their impact still has a presence).

People talked of the new feeling of unity (despite the petulance of Daly, many whispered as if in confidence).

People talked of budgets, crime and the desire for cooperation between the Mayor and the new Board President (despite the fact it's never been true in the past)

People talked of President-elect Obama and hope (despite the fact that the nation's needs have little to share with San Francisco's hopes).

People talked of Shanghai and Gaza and Iraq (despite the fact we have troubles here in this very neighborhood worthy of wars).

People talked of their voices mattering, after long knowing how their lives had lost pride and respect and protection (despite the fact that businesses always get first hearing, regardless of the politician, while homeless factions get less and less respect, losing more and more dignity).

People talked of freedom and its responsibility, and of a new-found redemption (despite the indifference and intolerance of many distinctly separate and insular communities in San Francisco).

People talked of a silver lining to the global crisis, how the Board and Mayor needed to work unilaterally to save what they can from the economic collapse (despite the fact that many have no idea what the actual trade deficit means or what the City's actual budget deficit is or where jobs will appear).

Let's wonder if there will be true progress with the new Board.
What's at the bottom of the list of demands
The Board must help with working out a realistic budget. Some demands will always be denied. For instance, when homeless people go looking for shelter daily, the progress that the Mayor's Office already tried to make ended up in disaster during November and December.

After the Mayor's reducing Tenderloin Health’s hours October 18, 150 Otis, Hospitality House and Glide Memorial United Methodist Church reported shelter reservation demand surged. Glide is now the Tenderloin’s sole source for homeless residents seeking morning shelter reservations. Glide opens for reservations at 7 AM, and within the hour, all shelter beds available get booked, which means staff have to turn away people who may have been waiting inline for hours, and any subsequent drop-in expectations are already gone. The savings of closing Tenderloin Health center to the budget was negligible. Yet the dilemma of getting beds is left without a solution.

Typically, no beds by 8 AM are available at MSC South; any of the shelter system’s open beds are miles away in the Bayview at the Providence shelter. Hospitality House often has few beds available. Late beds that become available for no-shows in the early evening at MSC or Providence are only available to those who wait at 150 Otis. The Interfaith Winter shelters are also overwhelmed, with only their 60-100 mats available, depending on the church that generously opens its doors.

Trying to find where beds are available during each day is mind-boggling and frustrating. There is no information and even the resource center staff speculate on availability.
How homeless connect to politics, while also managing to survive
To stay informed, the homeless depend on word of mouth. They have no daily updates available to them, much less hourly updates.

As everyone recalls, in 2007, Google had negotiated with the city and Earthlink to provide free wi-fi citywide, which a smaller company instead, Meraki ("Free the Net") in SoMa, took up supporting during 2008. The nonprofit, Project Homeless Connect (PHC), installed Meraki radios atop the Alexander Residence, Antonia Manor, Curran House, Franciscan Towers, Plaza Apartments, Ramona Apartments and West Hotel, and on Housing Authority apartment buildings throughout the Tenderloin and SoMa.

So far, those with wifi connections have yet to find any information available on a regular basis.

St. Anthony’s and S.F. Network Ministries’ Tech Lab is an obvious choice where people can go (outside of the few computers at the Main Library and at friends or the rare acquaintance who can offer a link).

San Francisco's Meraki citywide network gives free repeaters to anyone who will also mount Meraki outdoor gear on rooftops or windowsills, thus forming a mesh to extend the network (their Website claims its network now covers about 10 square miles and is in use by 180,000 S.F. residents, up from 20,000 a year ago), planning to blanket the entire city sometime in 2009.

What social networks the homeless have, due to Free the Net's opening up of the Webspace, have little to offer so far in 2009, besides the news of a new progressive Board of Supervisors.

Let's hope the progressive factions listen to the activist Web users who happen to be homeless who are calling for change. They need to know if they've got a bed tonight.


07 January 2009

Rarities and a bucket of fish for the mostly harmless

Oblivious to most of the Western world's sanguine view, homelessness became the people's own worst enemy all for the sake of business getting the most profit, as people shook their heads wondering where they were supposed to live, what they were supposed to eat, who they could depend on for jobs.

Profit as norm became the key, and the homeless were given the door, without even a bucket to wipe up the mess. The door's now shut, locked, and the homeless wander the streets, with mass media pointing their fingers with indifference, intolerance, and uncertainty at the epitome of America's disgrace.

I watch ships sail into San Francisco each day loaded with containers for American markets; they leave nearly empty of cargo.
All in the name of free, U.S. economy questions its reign
The mostly harmless homeless get blamed for wanting their shelter, their food, their street sweeping jobs and service industry casual work, all living essentials of which have become competitively non-existent and rarefied even to find each day.

Shelters are crowded or unavailable. Food is unaffordable. Lines for jobs are at least 100 people for every position open, at best. The jobs that are there are paying half of what they used to pay and benefits are rare.

First it was factories making auto parts taking their business outside the country borders, then it became autos, then it was magnets, then it became bomb parts, then bombs.

First it was countries like Congo Republic or Rwanda or Brazil having their resources ravaged―tin, lumber, diamonds, tungsten, cerium, lanthanum, and other rare earth metals, used in everything from cigarette lighters, laptops, televisions, microwaves, magnetized drivers (for navigational and surveying devices based on the reception of signals from an array of orbiting satellites) used in everything from cars to bombs―then it was wars over such resources at the same time as genocide and outright slavery took place in these faraway third, fourth and fifth world countries.

Funny how your competitors or your enemies figure you out and turn on you when you think they're oblivious to your new way of doing your business. Or playing the game.

Funny ironic, and not at all funny, in the sense of laughing all the way to the bank. Because look what's happened to our banks.

Enemies stay enemies only because of the tyranny of covetousness. Greed. Simple greed. Such games of business haven't mattered to hear our legislatures and Congressional leaders speak about the new rules in place, and what they can do to reconcile the damages.
What the news does and doesn't tell us
What we are able to get as news is half-truths and manipulation of the truth. Benefit cuts. Outsourcing. Enron. Worldcom. Pension funds invested in risky hedge funds. Layoffs at Christmas. Bailouts of banks, industries, non-profits, everything but sports franchises (I hope I don't speak too soon, since such franchises depend on tax dollars for their revenue). All with the U.S. trade deficit growing and the value of the U.S. dollar dwindling. Unspeakable billions if not trillions of dollars, gone.

Business hasn't cared about the people it uses for decades, centuries depending on which economic system you consider. All that matters is profit.

Loans have shifted. Percentage rates changed. Almost overnight it was an arbitrage of the work force.

Homes were at risk.

Futures became bleak.

Dependability backfired, with credit evaporating, jobs going overseas, retirement nest eggs collapsing.

Retirement seems a nightmare.

Thanks for the fish, Uncle Sam. Can I have my bucket? How much do I owe you for your renting it out to your service contractors? Oh and how much do I owe you for sleeping on this rotten pier, watching the waves?

My view is different, that's for sure. At least I have my memories, thanks to Douglas Adams and with others like him, still I have a sense of humor and pride. At the end of the decade, will I belong to China?


05 January 2009

Same as it ever was, or what "the poor you will always have with you" know

How we ever ended up in a situation where we depend on the kindness of strangers, I would say is a long story with a short premise: homelessness could happen to anyone.

Attributing blame or ascertaining causes could be as simple as the explanation of the economy.

Managing any form of legislation for the bureaucracies such as the Human Services Department in San Francisco, especially with respect to providing any detailed reports on the budgets (how money gets spent on each individual and how the recipients of such money spend the funds), is about as easy as creating legislation to stop the brothel slavery business that has a booming trade in the same areas where homeless sleep in doorways every night.

We could look at where we were a decade ago or a century ago.

We could look at where the price of gas or other intractable economic problems had us shaking our heads within the last year or we could look at the cost of living a decade ago.

We could look at where debt exists, the demographics of who has it, who's had it, and who have had it and want nothing to do with its convenience or its entitlements.

We know that the few will always maintain their wealth and power, and that the many will grow larger as their voices and strength diminish. Anytime the needs get more expensive and in less supply, the reasonable can attest to the expectant coercion of politics manipulating the social forces. We all need food and shelter and the means to provide such essentials is what empowers the few to control the ways to allow life's blessings on those who must deal with homelessness.
Letting the days go by, until recently
The plutocracy of the rich have their lobbyists to maintain control in Washington or the places of power. The corporations and private charities that invisibly hide those in power have a freedom to keep the laws in this favoring a continuing of the process that daily holds the rest of us away from influencing distributions of food and shelter and essentials. Simply, those who have power keep the power's prosperity and freedom away from everyone else.

They laugh at revolution; it'll likely never manifest. Attrition eventually could rid us all of the problems of poverty and perdition, if we accept the consequences of remaining in the dark, hungry and without resources.

The universe knows how it works; humans still try to change the reality.

For me, it's been this year when circumstances didn't hold together for my ways and means to survive. I could see the predicament developing, since I've had the blessings of abundance and the ability to overcome adversity of scarcity. I've always had work. For me, it's easier to see when I must put up with having less and less while losing more and more; I've always known how to survive. Yet I must also make the distinction that I've never felt entitled to anything more than abundance, as long as I can share.

Up until recently, I've rarely had to count pennies or days or portions.

I could say it's about politics and the war machine and the cuts in taxes.

I could say it's how it's always been: as with the teachings of Christ―"the poor you will always have with you" while providing a spiritual direction of living with the Golden Rule and believing in God in all things, has, as its modern interpretation that of its justifications for poverty rather than its justifications of inequities, or of accepting that "we will not always have Christ"―just like the teachings of any beliefs, for salvation, or salvaging, life's more than about correcting disparities.

I could say I do know differently that we will always strive towards equality. There will always be conflicts over greed or denial or inadequacies. Claiming superiority is justification for a great many immoral acts or even atrocities.

I know it's a deliberate confusion of economics that the trillions in debt and the billions in waste are part of the struggle that we all have understanding the fiscal mess. I look at my annual Social Security statement to see the patterns, most of which have nothing to do with me or my choices. I know when jobs have been fewer or more at risk of sustaining me, just as I've known when it's time to seek more security.
After us
The more obscure of the "Once in a Lifetime" lyrics (Talking Heads/Brian Eno, 1980) of "time isn't holding up, time isn't after us" are, to me, the real point of how we got here, in that we refused to see the flow. We didn't need dams or bridges. We didn't think the tap would ever run dry. We knew we'd always get what we needed somehow.

We knew the rise and fall and we trusted that nothing lasts like trust. Until it's gone.

Somehow we trust that we won't always be poor and suffering if we have a plan and objectives.

So perhaps it's about the powers that be depending on attrition.


01 January 2009

Black swans, homeless: worthless and unworthy of respect?

Shame of society is that we need solutions that work and we tend to hold those in contempt for becoming victims to the problems. Homelessness, for instance, can become a lifestyle, due to the marginalization of people. Political attempts fail to fix such situations on a macro scale without determining how people survive in their basic daily sensibility.

No one wants to find out what it is to be homeless and to live with the contempt for being in such a predicament.

People can be messy. Inconsiderate. Peripheral to norms, or downright crazy. Uncomfortable. Uncooperative. Lazy. Mean. Dumb (as compared to ignorant of circumstances).

If someone's soiled their pants, do you help them or do you just hold your nose and scold them as you walk off, disgusted?

If someone's not getting or staying in line, do you ask politely if they want to be in the queue or do you just get in front of them without caring?

If someone's jabbering away and they have no cellphone, do you engage them in a conversation or do you go elsewhere to avoid them bothering you?

If you know how to help someone even though it's obvious how they could get help, do you advise them or just let them figure their problem out for themselves?

If resources were more manageable, would the homeless problems manifest, especially with those who are chronically in need?

Questions abound with simplifying one of the most prevalent problems facing society. Our economy is in flux with many people wondering how they'll survive. Meanwhile, they have needs.
Coordinating dependencies when changing established routines
Examples abound for fixing broken systems, from free U.S. grants to Nigerian lottery scams. Sometimes it's obvious what gets a homeless person's attention, just as it's obvious what gets a philanthropist's attentions.

San Francisco likes to serve as the shining example for what works.

There, 150 Otis is one of the main shelter resources for men (there are several during the weekdays that sometimes become nothing more than time wasting hangouts); for women, Buster's Place became Women's Place as a resource center for women to locate shelters, while families use other resources like Hamilton and Raphael House. The alternative solution after waiting in these centers for one of the chairs to become available (one of 20-60 or so, depending on the weather and the space) is wandering the streets looking for income (jobs, drug dealing or whatever other scams that appear), finding shelter or leaving town.

Sometimes it seems the political systems for the homeless actually seem to discourage people as if the lifestyle is a choice.

Homelessness is never a choice.

Homelessness can be a lack of choices, a predicament.

Most homeless find the frustration and the resulting depression of the reality a waste of time. Charities sometimes don't have other more viable plans, since they do what they've always done.

There have to be better plans that doesn't cost millions, and so that the costs actually go to solutions rather than unaccountable charity based organization costs (CBOs like churches and other legally funded charities, often see funding substantially getting lost in paychecks and futile treatment).

In the winter, shelters open for a short time in church basements or halls, if they can. These are not dependable realities. The bare bones approach exists during the winter months (mid-December through late January), even in normally temperate San Francisco, where several churches do open to approximately 100 homeless (the overflow of San Francisco's political solutions).

The effort makes a large difference in dependably balancing out needs, since people don't waste their day waiting without knowing where they'll sleep each night. They are not vulnerable to the elements of cold and rain and therefore do not end up clogging the hospitals.

The routines that people face are less troublesome, providing the beds and simple meals without the aggravation of wondering where to find such simple resources. Sleeping requirements are basic mats, blankets and dry, warm rooms. Food can be simple rice, beans and frozen vegetables; with a little creativity, cooks can develop wonderful meals in no time.

There may be simple needs missing such as hot showers and resources for which other centers in the cities provide. The main point of such temporary shelters is that they are not places to establish any expectations. People still need to have dependability. Else their lives do become lifestyles.
What works and what doesn't work as homeless solutions
Anecdotes, pictures and testimonials are the kind of evidence that passionate believers in charity programs tend to find most relevant, because it vividly confirms what they already believed.

Scattered success stories can’t really capture whether a program is working. Out of 100 people in a program, the odds are that some of them will see their lives improve, just by chance―regardless of what programs in which they did or didn’t enroll.

As anyone familiar with medical trials and the "placebo effect" knows, testimonials are a far cry from evidence that a treatment works.

Simple comparisons of program participants and non-participants are other means by which to assess what's working.

Consider homeless as children, just for analogy to the vulnerability people face when suddenly or chronically . There are obvious simplifications that I'm suggesting of course. Chess-in-the-Schools is a program in New York City that introduces optional chess activities to lower-income schools. It has pointed out that students who participate perform much better in math than students who don’t, and organizations have used this fact to boast of the power of chess to shape young minds. Of course, I can think of another reason that kids who like chess do better in school than kids who don’t―odds are, they were more interested in their studies in the first place.

Many charity evaluations use criteria for assessing effectiveness along these basic lines. For example:
  • A child care program points to superior results for its children, compared to those whose parents chose not to enroll them; the difference could be the child care program, but I’d guess it’s often the parents.
  • An employment program boasts that its graduates are better able to hold jobs than its dropouts; of course, holding a job an often come down to being the sort of person who sticks with programs instead of dropping out.
Greatnonprofits.org and GiveWell.net, online charity evaluators and funding organizations that put their ranking systems online, are seen as the front-runners to bring transparency to the charity world.

When people give, they like to know if they made a difference.

For instance (even if New York City organizations may have been the examples), all the charities that GiveWell evaluated for their effectiveness in the local and larger communities had criteria that other charitable organizations could follow.

The concept of black swan theory is when such predictability of events and outcomes is suspect, that, often, such solutions come only in hindsight. We avoid the black swans or make them as outcasts unworthy of respect, even worthless.

For instance, the outbreak of the WWI and the terrorist bombings of 9/11 has been a major consideration for how to avoid tragedy. The problem with these, as with several other similar examples, is that these events were largely foreseen by many people, but these people were either ignored or marginalized, often for political reasons. Several historians have argued that there were quite a few diplomats and experts on foreign policy who recognized the likelihood of a calamitous major war caused by the instability of certain areas of Europe and the system of alliances in the early 20th century. These experts were largely ignored and their analyses excluded from history books.

If the same conceptualization for homelessness is that it will never go away, the argument could be that the economic and social behaviors demand such outcomes. Someone inevitably must become the black swan. The unavoidably worthless.

Justice Department statistics show that 93% of child victims are molested by someone they know.

"There's this mythology that you have to know who this scary man is in the neighborhood who might hurt your child, when the reality is sex offenders are often people we know and love," said Jill Levenson, an associate professor at Lynn University in Florida and a researcher on sex offenders.

That the scary stranger is the black swan is an easy speculation, sure to fail. Homeless people do not always want to scam the systems or society. They want an affordable home and a dependable job and expectations for being safe.

Such respectfulness doesn't seem to be too much to ask, yet we avoid getting to such solutions.


25 December 2008

Extraordinary circumstances call for extraordinary measures

Holidays seem the only times there's no avoiding considering those less fortunate. A galvanizing force makes the reality of charitableness change: it's not someone else's job, it becomes everyone's responsibility.

Some people on the streets are lucky to be inside of the shelters provided, due to crowding conditions, due to the marginalized there who refuse to behave, and due to an innate sense of alienation.

During any ordinary day there are countless hungry, some who have no place they know to go besides the legacy church soup kitchens and dining rooms (St. Anthony's knows the limits it's managing in San Francisco, barely, as one of the oldest charity institutions; others, like Glide, try to outsmart the street smart and still try to accommodate what they can afford).

Some destitute refuse to fight to get their food and shelter, and end up on the streets, wasting to nothingness.
Choices not realized during holidays
Homeless congregate, sometimes with no other choice, right in the middle of public spaces (parks, squares, shopping centers). Anyone can see them, every day of the year, even on the holidays when people are more generous and giving, and offering them places to go for a special meal, times like Christmas or Hanukkah, when homeless alone are at their lowest in spirits.

If you pay attention among the homeless, you'll see the gamut of society.

When you give something to the homeless (something other than money, which is momentarily forgotten), say, a warm meal or a winter coat or toys as presents for their children, the person's whole spirit changes.

A rare sigh comes from their presence and an even rarer smile graces their faces, usually followed by tears, having forgotten what contentedness or happiness, even momentarily, means.

Loneliness is second nature yet it's diminished by primary needs of food and shelter. So many thought they knew their dependable means of surviving would always last. Now they must fight to live in scarcity.

Charitable flyers and handouts show anyone where to get basics to survive, yet the reality of finding real help is much different; it takes work to figure out how to get what you need, especially when the resources keep diminishing, due to budgets, growing numbers and lack of a real plan.

Government agencies really have no idea what they face with the problems of the expanding bottom part of American society. With depleted reserves, the insularity of the bureaucracy has become its worst enemy. Saying no to the wrong person can be devastating.

Mothers become unable to provide for their children, having them put into foster care.

Once virile and stalwart workers can't do more than offer help, due to liabilities within outreach centers, when there's just no work to provide.

There are tech fringe survivors, Vietnam and Iraqi War veterans, ex-con street-tough black Muslims, immigrant laborers, gay Mormons, fiercely radical libertarians, dispirited yet adamantly loyalist Constitution-supporting right-wing extremists.

From stunned construction workers to childless mothers, from Bible-reading Deadheads to unemployed financial brokers, from sullen teens to nowhere-headed punks, the homeless are all in an even wider spectrum of cultures that never thought they'd face such circumstances.

Deliberately isolating environments are where people go to ask for help, with security guards nearly demanding a strip search because of their wand's detecting something metal (belt buckles, bra clips, and such inarguable dangers as surgically implanted devices).

In this bureaucratic system for general assistance ("GA" or welfare, as it's known), paperwork often has no purpose other than to waste time, space, energy, precious resources and trees. Manipulative waiting causes the lines and directions of lines leading only to delusions. All the paper and the longest lines cannot deter some people, their spirits not letting their confidence in hope to diminish. They trust to return their worlds to stability or dependability.

"You don't have a case worker? We can't help you today," says the woman behind the window to me on Christmas Eve morning. That's when I was told to come to get what I'd expected, in order to have something dependable, a plan, a hope, an agenda other than wasting time. "You'll have to return in January," the woman tells me. So much for expectations of a plan, I thought.

Sometimes the confusion is an administrative bureaucratic imperative to keep order in the growing homeless resource madness. Reticence with routines and deliberately unclear expectations act as deterrents to make those in need avoid such systems, seeming in many ways just like with prisons for society's safeguards.

If you don't explain your expectations, everyone has ways of getting what they need to be rid of you.
Sometimes even holidays have no surprises
We're finally ensuring something's done for requests from the fire battalions and police brigades and church elders and others who provide distribution to homeless or deprived children getting holiday presents. Still it's seldom that the loneliest homeless get even a meal, much less any recognition of presents.

We rush through life forgetting strangers since we hardly have time for ourselves and our families. Bills and mortgages and other exigencies still demand their due. Time catches up with us, passes us often, overwhelms and overtakes us in the race that we unknowingly impose upon our lives. Sometimes even families become strangers to themselves.

Kept photographs don't focus away the moments that we miss, little moments seeming suddenly so far away, friends and family now strangers who had their subtle yet significant impact on us drifting away, tasks that seemed insurmountable fulfilling most expectations before dependencies did away with so many of our lifelong dreams.

Holidays remind us what we have.

Sometimes what it takes to remind us of what we can look forward to having in that ever hopeful future, and the many more anniversaries, inevitably, are forces or choices happening to empower our actual identity's sense of its confluence of fates. Sometimes we lose our sense of self, where we can get help being meaningless, those to whom who we could turn being just as needy, and the bigger picture of society becoming an illusion of community.

We get tired of wasting time or energy. We realize what we can tolerate and what we abhor.

Love always has its loss to face.

Sometimes we're not able, ready or willing to let go of our attachments. So we try to replace such lacking with charity and holiday gifts.

When we don't even have those enticements, we look for what we do deserve. For homeless, we look for what we can get.


17 December 2008

Winter's long restless nights of worry numb the homeless

Provisionally, San Francisco has set up the homeless, getting them off the streets.

Near midnight, at the 150 Otis drop-in site, I'd waited for hours to get into one of the city-funded, CBO-operated shelters. Told I'd be driven nearby to warmth, with full facilities, that there wouldn't be room for many people, yet we'd have food and a decent place to sleep, I accepted the offer.

"Worse conditions exist," said Max, the director of the Mobile Assistance Patrol workers. Searching those destitute on the streets, he and his staff then deliver people to churches or shelters, wherever the winter outreach plan is ready; these aren't the same standards San Francisco has for the homeless sleeping conditions, for the full year shelters.
Spending time with decisions with no solutions
Having spent the day looking for work and trying to hunt down a definite bed reservation for the night, I felt a relief.

As numbers grow among those who can't sleep on the street or in the frontiers of the wooded parks or in the abandoned vehicles in the Potrero warehouse districts or in houses that are in foreclosure ("squatting"), and as temperatures drop into the 30s, desperation and alarm worry everyone.

When I'd first arrived at 150 Otis, a meeting was in progress, discussing how better to run resource operations for homeless people. Lessy Benedith, the director of operations for MSC-South, the largest of the city shelters, had asked for feedback. I'd had something to offer.

"Obviously, the numbers are getting out of hand, with people waiting out in the streets, simply to wait for a number, then to sign a list, to which, when beds become available, they are numb, getting sick, nearly needing emergency medical services," I said.

"Obviously, that's costing the city more for medical treatment than just making more space available for the waiting periods. If we have no better ways to speed up the process for empty bed assignments, then we need bigger waiting rooms for people to retreat. That's plain budgetary sense."

Everyone from Mayor Newsom's Homeless Policy Director, Dariush Kayhan, to each and every resource center's staff has heard the complaints. No one's making any decisions, which becomes the problem waiting for other solutions.

I described how, just prior to coming to 150 Otis, I'd had my encounter with one homeless veteran, who was suffering with overwhelming despair. His leg amputated from the knee, he wore a bandaged dressing over what was his personal legacy of the Iraqi war. "Someone who had no reason to be on the street, yet one of many, contemplating suicide," I said. "Because I wanted to make sure he got counseling, to prevent anything tragic, and he wouldn't join me here, that's why I'm just now getting here, with no number, no name on the list, and no hope of a bed before midnight, at best. He was taken away in an ambulance. Likely I'll never see him again."

Several people immediately, empathetic, offered their numbers and I had to sigh. I had done nothing to deserve taking their due.

So I waited, several hours, as did the rest of the crowd, sustaining themselves on stale bread and meager helpings of potato salad brought from one of the shelters, left-overs of left-overs. The television blared for what seemed like forever for the 40 able to have chairs inside, as many of us waited outside, hoping for the lucky bed to become available. The distraction of the MAP director, Max, seemed like my only solution.

"You going or not?" one of the drop-in site workers said to me as I collected myself, still debating ("wallet, gloves, hat," I think). "What else you waiting for, Christmas? You got you a bed tonight."

Max took four of us to Ark of Refuge.

The means for getting a bed for a night means using only the resource centers/drop-in sites, which is a routine currently different than the routines earlier this year, with more restrictions on availability, yet with the same desultory considerations of the common predicaments homeless face.

Entering Ark, there are no metal detectors, and nowhere to secure belongings, which shelters like MSC or Next Door insist are the only ways to contain violence by confiscating any form of weapons.
Homelessness for the holidays
I quickly consider my choices, reconnoitering the escape exits. We're between Harrison and Howard, and Sixth and Seventh in SoMa, near the heart of San Francisco. No preventative measures for weapons are obvious. We're asked to sign in with our name and a time of arrival; no identification requests or verification of ourselves are necessary.

Hovering in the chill draft, there is a lingering scent of candle wax, though nothing's burning.

A man recites scriptures out of a pocketbook keepsake. Two young women grope through their bags. An older woman rocks back and forth in a mumble of obliviousness.

A non-denominational altar is the main focus and around the edges of the hall, twelve men lay on Red Cross cots, snoring loudly in the echoing half-darkness, under thin gray blankets smelling faintly of disinfectant, naphthalene and cedar oil.

Reverend Melinda, a plump cherub of a woman with rosy cheeks, and Deacon Ken, a tall, Jamaican man, introduce themselves just after our arrival. A staff of two women from MAP requests some statistics, asking our name, age, and last four digits of our Social Security code, with a cursory discussion of our needs.

Cots are stiff, creaking and stained with age. Restrooms are simply a toilet and a basin, and a urinal doesn't work, and the markings for both women and men confuses those of us trying to maintain civility.

Folding tables have dispensers of coffee, and empty pizza boxes.

I decide on a cot near the hall's altar, in a corner. I don't remember having removed my shoes or having falling asleep.

It's 6 AM when I awake. Quickly using the restroom facilities, numb from a cold, restless night, I leave, determined to develop a better situation for the day.

"Enjoy the holidays," Reverend Melinda says to me. So this is the holidays, I think, with no work and expectations bleak for everyone. "We will transcend," I hear, exiting.


14 December 2008

Do fish dream of homelessness?

Staggering through the cold, we struggle with the drop-in site/resource centers all claiming the same plea, "If you want a bed for the night, you're gonna hafta wait." What happens is, even if they do get a bed, most of the homeless are back on the street due to inadequate support for their situation.

Mobile Assistance Patrol is a city program that helps the homeless, often the disabled and the mentally ill and the elderly, going around in the MAP van, transporting the helpless to emergency rooms or drop-in sites to get them off the streets.

"They pass out on the sidewalk downtown, I bring them here to get cleaned up, and a couple days later they're right back where I found them," the driver of the van, Ben, tells me as his partner helps an elderly, inebriated gentleman up the stairs of 150 Otis, one of the main drop-in sites for San Francisco. Many of us are waiting for a bed in a shelter, and we watch the scene as we all wait, since there's no room inside during the rain. "Just be glad it's not you," Ben says. "At least you're tolerating the cold."

People in charge inside have recapitulated the standard story, a compromise of overwhelming numbers, dissuaded hopes, and economic demands, barely satisfying the needs of those who have nowhere else to turn for help. So we wait in the rain until beds become available, the "bed drop," as what the staff shout while we wait to hear our names.

"Everyone knows how to fix the system of resentment, just as everyone rants how they could provide more, everyone explains what they'd do, everyone asserts the doctrine of emergence, if only they had control," Ben says to me.

It all appears like extortion to mend the public's inequities.
We know the routine, even with skepticism
I'm remembering what the police had said to the homeless outside the Main Library. "So you homeless congregate out here, or on some drop-in center steps, or you're under streetlights, maybe pretending to wait for buses, or we find you out in the Potrero and out near the 280 overpass, you're out there warming your hands like the great Depression over flaming trash barrels, or we find you in bundles in hidden alleyways, or we find you sitting in some business door, or we find you on ledges beneath any roof barely sheltering you from the wind and rain," Officer Jensen said. "And you still don't want to leave your spot."

Anywhere we're not told to move, anyplace that gives a relief from their misery's predominance, we homeless are not sanguine about the prospects. Whoever passes learns the ignominy to mask their insularity. Police Sgt. Joe Garrity of the Tenderloin Station had told me what choices I had today, besides what I already knew, of where to go. "I'm not arresting any of the homeless, unless they're creating a serious disturbance. Sometimes we do the homeless a favor by arresting them. We're the only outreach workers on the street, really, giving a chance to hook up with something."

Fortunately, no one was arresting me. Today I was the fish that got away.

Every ideology of politics turns away from the sordid complaints, unless it meets their needs.

I was amused at the irony of some passing tourists while speaking with the police. "Homeless are all the same fish, uncatchable for the purpose of the better commonality," one tourist exclaimed while passing the homeless near San Francisco's Civic Center, "they're even unwilling to work to clean up the streets. It's crazy the cops do nothing."

"They're not going away, so we just let them be," Sgt. Garrity said to me after hearing the comment, almost like I would pass the comment on to other tourists.

Unless it enriches the powers that be, no contribution to the organized ocean of poverty seems to make any difference, right or left, progressive or liberal, there always seems someone wanting to enrich a false promise. Hope seems an empty plan.

All the looks of contempt, the disregard for anyone wanting, this is what keeps the world turning.

For shelters, it's about fire code restrictions, lotteries for providing order to the lack of a system's direction, cumulative probabilities undermining actualizing any real help, rules of arbitrary changing fashion as a result of how the superior edict frames the solidarity, structured schedules forced upon the many for the sake of a few who have the privilege of work to do (mopping, sweeping, attempting to recycle waste, all the efforts without a sense of a fundamental ecology and any sort of populism), and doing whatever it takes to appease the status quo, and at any means necessary avoiding the mix with the hoi polloi.

Everything has a price, even the homeless network solutions. Enrichment of a blind economy has its controversies; following the money is a maddening convolution of feigning morality with no better idea.

Commodifying everything is the given.
Compliance is widespread by a fresh take on propaganda
Utopias will manifest, we're told, as soon as the powerbase relinquishes its hold.

Any possible anarchy's then liquidated of its greed for specious justice by a mainstream of hollow voices, appeasing the message by diluting its source of who's most deserving of reforms, still finding audience for a lost longing.

Even the radical view becomes profitable, and still nothing's satisfied.

We're dupes when we fall into the unrecognized persuasiveness of rhetoric for the worries without the redemption. It's like a bad plot with bad characters, searching for our base desires, placating, not fulfilling real rights.

Probabilities towards indulgence will continue to delay exciting any conspiracy to revolt by an inertia of impossibilities for deriving resources. "We can't get blood from a turnip," say the gatekeepers at the resource centers, "especially if we don't have turnips."


12 December 2008

Rendezvous (no shock)

Some blogs you just don't want to read, no matter how transitory the content: you don't want that dreamscape or that dreamtime ever in your universe; its intransigency can be as infinite as light and as lasting as the stigma of a scar (explaining circumstances that led to the situation over and over again).

Some people you pass on the street who are homeless, who may be suffering with bipolar disorder or some other psychosocial incongruence combined with addiction tendencies, are the ones who get all the attention. There are countless homeless who are invisible, put into the same indiscriminate mass.

Each tree of life takes the wind in its own particular way.

We're all on the Web trying to find something, or to tease ourselves with thinking we have an audience, or, having that audience, manipulating the senses of vibration to a higher calling, beyond the wormhole distractions of the Web's attraction. Sometimes like the tube, we're only looking for distraction, not real, pragmatical functions of our customary yet natural nihilistic hyperbole. Sometimes we have a story to tell. Sometimes all we can do is fly with the mercy of the wind.
What all birds come to know about the Web
Some stories get to us because of what we don't see, not because of what we do see. We need to bring the audience back into partnership with our storytelling. Otherwise, our eggs have no purpose, and our stories are empty, despite the abundance of seeds of life. Our feathered nest is longing for different ways to flock. We find characters, events, and anecdotes that build our world, getting all our eggs in one basket, making us richer for the experience, taking flight with the universal twitter. Telling ourselves stories to find broadcasts, wavelengths, frequencies, bitstreams, signalling, we get links in our growing world to the birds of passage.

I'm on the Web for a sense of resilience.

Ironically, my story is what needs me to give my evolution purpose, as ever was. I've had a calling and I've had a nest and I've countless other birds to share my humanness.

Now all flown. The revolution still has its posterity.

Arianna Huffington explains the postmodern dilemma: "Blogging is not about perfectionism. Blogging is about intamacy, immediacy, transparency, and sharing your thoughts the way you share them with a friend." She forgets to mention that the whole world can then see your thoughts, though it's not exactly like brain surgery in action, while you're trying to win a Pulitzer. That's hardly my intention, unless such rewards were to provide some greater contribution.
At least I have a sense of flight
I'm back to where I was six months ago, a shelter in San Francisco that's relatively safe, considering the alternatives. Choices are few, when my basic needs of a shelter are so that I can get work upon which I can depend, and have a place that keeps me out of the elements.

MSC is the largest, most populated homeless shelter in San Francisco. I have no reasons to deny its uncomfortability, its cultural exploitativeness, its arbitrary rules for the sake of order, its alienating confinement. It's not home, more a transitory solution, a means to avoid worse circumstances. It's a place to make sure I get no deeper into the desperation in which I've found myself, and in which from time to time we all find ourselves. Since I was last here (in May 2008), there had been a change of standards, supposedly; "changes aren't obvious, since old habits die hard," David, one of the shelter residents, confided.

Homelessness is a mire in which we're all squirming, watching the others in flight.

Such inertia reminds me of the Simon & Garfunkel song, "I Am A Rock," and its lyrics, "I have my books, and my poetry to protect me." The song is soundtrack to a current momentum, the melancholy dilemma collapsing around me ("books would weigh me down to the point of a worse condition, so all I can hold to is poetry," I had just said to someone in line waiting to get into the shelter; I couldn't believe he'd get my point without just staring at me with confused indifference, yet he found the line amusing, since he's got his hiphop lines too).
When grim gets grimmer, even some fish know to fly
I'd dreaded this solution. When whatever work appeared and developed into only temporary predicaments, and as I used the income as piecemeal contrivance to avoid welfare and shelter realities, it's been only a matter of time for either something to materialize or everything to collapse. I wish I had alternatives now other than what society affords.

Arriving at MSC, I see the line had been forming since mid-afternoon, those who knew the numbers with whom they'd be competing for beds, fixing on me as one more to betray their needs.

Commiserating conversations were fortunately in the air.

Self-interest wasn't destroying whatever camaraderie I used to have to salvage. I have yet to know who's watching whose backs. Yet the faces who've made themselves familiar and friendly are abundant. "Ya never know when ya might need someone's help, so no use burning bridges. We all gotsta watch out for each other," Henry ahead of me says, in as close as I could expect of a welcoming greeting.

Birds of a feather have nowhere else to be. I am given a bed for the night, and the rain's first drops and the wind picking up make for a grim gratitude.

The morning will have other realities to face. Sleep is not easy, especially with disturbances that are common.

In what I've decided to blog (no Pulitzer forthcoming), the resulting poetry being my salvation: the dreams may return to use the inertia, feeding evolution's reasons to fly, just like light (what even some fish come to know).

It's dark now and raining harder. The storm has a different dream.


08 December 2008

Hi-def homelessness, vacuum-packed

As much as I ignore the fact, sometimes I can't deny that there are some people who are homeless who just don't even get the time of day from me. Today's San Francisco Chronicle told of an horrific tragedy of some formerly homeless drunk who killed his 87-year-old aunt, Amberene Grayson, with an icepick, then cooked himself a meal in what was her home. His days are numbered, and I don't particularly care what time of day it will be.

What was missing from the story as of today is when there will be services. Even among homeless people, there will be those wanting to have their time of prayer and grief.

Another story making the rounds is of a supposedly homeless dog in Santiago, Chile, who risked life and limb to save another dog's life who'd been hit on a freeway. I wonder what separates some dogs from humans.

Humans struggle daily to keep their integrity and dignity, knowing where, usually, to go to seek help.

Telling the truth when in dire circumstances being homeless, we are often met with either sympathetic stares or extreme disregard.

Everyone always has self-interest, whether as motivation or as reminder of what could be.

Rarely do people in power have solutions other than what most of us already know: the agencies, the religious caretakers, the forward-thinking grassroots seat-of-our-pants groups. So when it comes to getting help when thwarted by governmental services, we consider leadership.

They always need support.

When leadership fails, we often don't persist, instead forming our own voice and action for change. Until recently, we haven't been able to depend on much help, and couldn't expect much direction.
Existing in a vacuum, homeless find wavelengths
Community support beckons to the homeless to form an orderly line to wait.

San Francisco's Project Homeless Connect event this past week seemed to me a success from the feedback I received and the impressions I had from personal experience. Of course, comparisons are to previous events. Its ways of showing order were one dynamic change. The waits weren't long and the direction of the line was practical. Televisions were thankfully missing from the lines, since enough of the waiting rooms homeless endure always have the blaring nonsense as background distraction more than helpful relief.

I was there to determine what shelter I might have available this month when I face the end of my state unemployment funds, just to see the worse scenario. Without much resolution, I waited until later in the week for appointments made there. I did however have the blessing of getting new spectacles. I haven't had an eye exam for nine years, and the scratched, filthy pair of glasses I have are due for replacement. The exam by VSP was thorough and I will have a respectable prescription with suitable frames within two weeks.

Most people were satisfied with the lunches of turkey and the pantry bags (as a parting gift with juices, snacks, toiletries, socks, and other sundries).

The medical services were in general met with few complaints.

Sometimes we do know how to meet people's needs.


04 December 2008

Tragedy's worst enemies are fear and ignorance, despite costs

Scars surface and emerge in the grim viral load counts, in the horrific and difficult choices people made, and in the moralizations that forget the faces, lives and impacts of AIDS/HIV+ in people's lives. We often can't read the news, good or bad, since it could be false hopes or despairing statistics.

In San Francisco Golden Gate Park's National AIDS Memorial Grove, we have a place to reflect on those we've lost to the enigma of a disease for which we still have no cure, for which we have lost lives of which the numbers are incomprehensible, for which we have over the last decade, finally, hope, for fighting its devastating misery and its immutable morbidity.

Reflecting, we have gratitude surely to countless people who've somehow looked past the suffering to get through the ways to overcome the symptoms, the conditions, the causes, and to have some manageability with HIV+ awareness and the ravaging costs.

Reflecting, we have sorrows and pain worthy of sharing the stigma that endures.

Reflecting, we have consciousness beyond the death sentence.

So we like to believe, when belief like hope is all we have.
Loss is not the only reality
No longer are millions dying every year. In the 1980s and 1990s, it was common to lose dozens personally every year, if not every month. Worldwide, over 33 million still deal with its reality. 80% of those who will die of AIDS this year live in Africa, where in some countries infection rates exceed 25% of the population. A new report from the United Nations indicates that new cases of HIV in Russia will more than double this year. In the U.S., we know there are at least 1.1 million diagnosed with HIV/AIDS, and over 50,000 prepared to die, every year. As of 2005, black women accounted for 64% of the women who were living with HIV/AIDS in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Today's HIV+ epidemic among women and girls is largely due to heterosexual transmission. Every day, over 6800 people contract HIV and over 5700 die from AIDS. AIDS kills one child every minute.

How HIV/AIDS manifests is a shock, a tragedy, a seemingly neverending story.

Whether it's nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, or thrush, bronchial inflammation, and pneumonia, or mood swings, mistrust, and acrimony, the ostracism of the epidemic's actual manifestation in our lives is a fundamental problem to having prevention, a cure, diagnosis, and treatment.

Before we can be rid of its fear, we must reflect on how we're human.

Fear destroys more than HIV/AIDS ever could, among families, and society. If we think the disease can never effect us personally, we live in an insane obliviousness. Kissing and hugs do not cause the infection and its infiltration into the human body. Ignorance does; we must tell youth again and again: "avoiding the practice of safe sex and denying the nature of addiction can be catastrophic" (transmission is simple, yet still complicated to comprehend for youth and many adults).
Sometimes it's difficult to know what to fight
Last Sunday was World AIDS Day, when the AIDS Grove had hundreds of people showing up, without fear, without shame, without complacency. Terry and Jules invited me there to the 15th Annual National AIDS Day Observance, since I explained I'd be getting their medications at S.F General's pharmacy, then dropping them at their flat on Russian Hill. "I'll fix a picnic lunch there and we'll go," I suggested.

They suggested instead that, after I get the medications, I meet them at Shanti, after their Learning Immune Function Enhancement (LIFE) meeting, a new approach to health and healing; it enforces the life philosophy where "long-term survivors of an AIDS diagnosis typically develop more self-assertiveness, a characteristic known to enhance immunity."

The pharmacist remembered me from a previous pickup visit. Startled at first by the charges, I knew the billing was unimportant since the plan covered the expense: I walked away from the counter with three medications, for getting through the month, and the bill was over $2000 (for: Combivir, which prevents T-cells from producing any new virus and decreases the amount of virus in the body, its cost being $1480; Lexiva, a protease inhibitor for blocking the protease enzyme in CD4 cells, preventing the cell from producing new viruses, its cost being $320; Isentress, an integrase inhibitor strains that are resistant to multiple antiretroviral drugs, its cost being $215). Medicare Part D was covering the bill, at a cost of at least $440,000 to each individual for treatment per year, from what Terry and Jules explained.

Whatever works to avert tragedy is what we tell ourselves. Anytime I consider my homeless plight, I know there are always those worse off than me.


02 December 2008

S-S-D-D (hero sandwich or baloney?)

Sometimes we humans have a will that's almost incapable of getting help. Pride or naïveté or the obstacles of our socio-governmental systems get in the way, making the means of resolution almost beyond realization.

We are yet however not beyond hope.

Homeless are ostensibly becoming increasingly adaptive and resourceful while remaining capricious (having exhausted all means of getting help from family, friends and other associates, we ask strangers or just fumble along until we get help).

"You develop coping mechanisms―a fight or flight response―when you are homeless that are probably not appropriate in mainstream culture," explains Jessica Welch, formerly homeless and now a student at Purdue University. "You get increasingly defensive and desperate. This is just one of the many things that make it difficult for homeless people to re-enter normal society. We have to understand that a goal of simply creating more affordable housing units is not enough; we need a complete social safety net, including better treatment and counseling options, and plenty of compassion and understanding on the part of the community," she said.

With Larry J. Zimmerman, Ph.D., a Purdue University professor of anthropology and museum studies at the School of Liberal Arts, she's provided a new anthropological insight with their book, "Archeology Of Homelessness" (due for publication Spring 2009 in the journal, "Historical Archeology").
Day-to-day existence is "S-S-D-D"
Homeless differentiate between modes of their day-to-day grasps at prosperity (we take what we can get; for instance, knowing how we're able to have private showers when we actually can afford SROs and thereby avoid shelters, and then also having the ability to turn lights off when we get tired, instead of when everyone else does when in shelters and the house rules determine when everyone sleeps, or as we all end up, just being awake in the dark); we learn how to adapt, whether it's with better behavior or by manipulating some social interactions. "S-S-D-D, (same shit, different day)," we homeless again and again have to say.

Reminded of this adaptation just last night, I once again had to let go of a habit. I'd awoken to a disturbance that someone was in danger.

My intent was to have finished a blog about World's AIDS Day, how I'd commemorated the occasion with two friends, both homeless and diagnosed with full-blown AIDS (a topic I'll save for another post). I'd fallen asleep, exhausted from my day's activities of looking for work and then of having seen to helping my friends (getting their anti-retroviral medications, and the magic mouthwash for thrush, all a long-winded story of its own in the making).

I am currently in one of the few remaining San Francisco weekly SRO vacancies, since that's what I can afford; so, yes, I do consider myself still homeless, or, as officials say, "borderline homeless."

Near midnight, it had been calm, enough surely to have fallen asleep.

"I'll break every f---ing bone in your faggot body and twist your spine around so you won't know which end's up," yelled some idiot miscreant two floors higher, the timbre in his voice even from where I was having a clear propensity to provoke or, at the very least, to threaten a victim who, I assumed, remained silent, presumably in shock from some senseless violence.

I was startled awake, plainly scared for whoever the victim was, uncertain at first whether to call 911, wondering if the police could find cause to arrest, or whether, after they left, it would jeopardize the victim's situation.

When I did moments later call, the 911 dispatcher assured me that my identity would remain anonymous when police showed, which came as a relief when they did. Actually having had to have arrested the idiot causing the disturbance, the police never contacted me. So, I had still to wonder whether my actions might jeopardize the supposed victim.

As it turned out (from discussing the event's results with others in the morning), the guy who was arrested had been screaming at neighbors, individuals who weren't even there at the time. Fortunately, no one was in any immediate danger. Police told the next-door neighbors that someone still had taken the appropriate action by calling them. The guy had resisted arrest, and was in danger of harming himself and others, in their judgment; one of the arresting officers had been injured, in fact.
Experiencing a different kind of naïveté
Later today after my telling of the story's events, I overheard an individual, someone I barely know by name, then retell their version.

"He is so naïve his best friends weren't even aware" was what was said about me (framing me as the "Blog Preacherman" or the "Hero Sandwich" in their account: "only time he mentions 'sperm' is when the subject's about whales," and "the only time you get him to use vulgar language in general is for dialogue, or when he'd tell you there's more appropriate language, then give you the 3000-year history of 'fuck'," and even, "oh sure he knows where the clitoris is, only he couldn't explain to his last five girlfriends how to pleasure them without making it be like an instruction manual" and, most telling, "oh sure he can fight, he'll fuck you up blind, I've seen him defend himself and other people, but if it's just him, he won't, he'll back off, he figure he's got no reason to stand up for himself").

Yes, I did giggle, and, no, I did not blush.

I was more put off by their denial of the event (and their insinuation of me as the "nebbish moral compass," which was not my intent) than I was by their characterizations of me. I had merely seen a predicament and acted upon my compulsion to prevent harm. "I'm no hero," I immediately remarked, with as much sense of confrontational muster as I could acquiesce.

"If it was me, I'd've stayed out of it," was the response.

What alarms me is such prevailing sentiment, such passivity and indecisiveness and inevitable inaction. In such situations as we experience in these SRO hotels, the only places that we can afford to have shelter with any form of autonomy, we face the dire jeopardy of being liable for the circumstances, since we are accountable then for giving the places a "bad name." We risk losing our ability to stay there if we do speak up for ourselves.

As much as there is neglect to any formal policy for the social policing of these private SROs, there seems to be a materialization of policy for, at least, shelters, for which the city remains somewhat accountable.
What's promised and what's viable
I recalled the City's "Homeless Plan" from the 2 June 2008 SF BAY GUARDIAN blog by Amanda Witherell (a vigilant journalist who has a demanding scope, one of which being the San Francisco "homeless beat"):

Dariush Kayhan said he and the Mayor would be putting together an official response to the report [San Francisco Homelessness 10-year plan], with more concrete details of their vision. In the meantime, he threw a few ideas to the meeting.

They include:
  1. A mobile Project Homeless Connect. This would be a roving team of health clinicians, mental health workers, volunteers from the organizations that participate in Project Homeless Connect, and other workers who [provide] case management and services, traveling from shelter to shelter on a regular rotation. We want to “look at how we could serve all of the shelters with a team,” said Kayhan.
    As it stands now, different shelters offer different services and it's something of a grab bag depending on where you're staying. Kayhan didn't say whether there would be one mass operation, or several small teams deployed daily, but he described it as a more agile response to the needs of homeless clients at all the shelters. When questioned about it, Kayhan indicated case managers and services currently sited at specific shelters could become part of the roaming team, but emphasized they'd be “enhanced with other services, with volunteer and business components.”
  2. “We heard, loud and clear: more senior beds,” said Kayhan. “And I'll add to that women's beds.” He said that respite care (which is for folks not quite ill enough for the emergency room, but not well enough to hang with the general population) would be “moving and co-locating with another location. We think that could free up space at one of the shelters,” and, he added, that “freed up space could be allocated to women or seniors.“ Respite is currently provided on one floor of Next Door shelter and at 39 Fell. I've heard rumors that the 39 Fell lease is up soon and the two facilities will mash up and be put elsewhere. Details to come on where that will be.
  3. The city needs to do more training for shelter employees. “We never really embraced it at the city level,” Kayhan admitted. This was a request frequently repeated at all of the shelter enrichment meetings I attended, and something I hear regularly from homeless shelter clients: treat the workers well, pay them adequately, teach them how to do their jobs, and that compassion and care you show them will trickle down to the clients. Kayhan envisions a more solid orientation or training for employees.
  4. A comprehensive program manual. Kayhan said there are so many parties involved, so many services and programs, but none of them have been really collated in one place. The effect is that a lot of people working in the industry aren't even aware of what other groups and programs are out there. This is something I've witnessed often at Homeless Services Provider Network meetings, where a number of people working on or along the same services haven't been connected with each other.
  5. Better accountability with client comments. “We already do client satisfaction surveys,” said Kayhan. “We could make these much more sophisticated.” He suggested more sharing of comments and surveys with the community.
We have yet to see what to expect from San Francisco, even with Wednesday's Project Homeless Connect event at Bill Graham Civic Auditorium.

Sure, we have tenant's rights for rent control, yet its compromise is that we must first have the "first, last, and security deposit" funds to claim such rights for becoming a tenant; so, first we must be able to save for that reality.

My hope is that Wednesday we get more than placating, baloney sandwiches and obsolete literature of bureaucratic propaganda, all of which were available when attending in the past. As usual, I guess, we'll take what we can get.


28 November 2008

Parity or parody (you decide):
"HOMELESS NEED NOT APPLY (without dancing shoes)"

"American Homeless Idol" had their auditions, with fans clamoring for attention.

Entrants were mostly homeless, while many merely claimed to be, anxious to the point of unctuous for their chance at fame. Sixty people made the cut, and they waited inside the lobby of the Cowell Theater at Fort Mason for their opportunity with the "American Homeless Idol" auditions.

Several had tried out also for the "So You Think Homeless Can Dance" tryouts, though none of the actual homeless were eligible, despite their polished routines and their satisfactory costumes (a sign had gone up outside that tryout's entrance, "HOMELESS NEED NOT APPLY").

One couple almost literally limped from there to the second round of "American Homeless Idol" auditions; they were not exactly tattered―more layered, wearing androgynous turquoise suits, ankle-length tortoiseshell dusters, cochineal kerchiefs and matching pumps―yet they still stuck to the theme of homelessness. "At least they match," Simon stage-whispered to Randy as the judges turned around to see the contestants again lining up, pointing to the one couple, "yet they still look like pimps."

With a dipteran transparency, the contestants' skins were hanging on them with a voracious intensity. "Skeletal doesn't sell, no matter the charity," smirked Randy.

Rubbing her fingertips against her forehead, Paula was the only judge who had any empathy. "Granted we have our work cut out for us."

"Shouldn't be on us," said Randy.

"Oh?" asked Paula. "They should just walk in off the street and meet your needs? Photogenically charming, and perfectly gifted? You just think picking your favorite vagrant, should be easy?"

"What's the pity!" Simon countered, his usual edge of sarcasm slashing the air with a twisting brutality. "Half these imbeciles wouldn't be here were it not for our leniency with their guilty pleasure-seeking approbation."

"I've had it with your atrocious cockiness. Consider our audience! You do recall how this whole thing started?" Paula blurted out, infuriatingly. "Josiah Leming? And Warner? At least you must remember their part?"
Seeing the "Best of Show"
The sixty folks who had made the grade stood around the entrance to the Cowell Theater, queuing for the second auditions, unsure if they should sit or stand.

Some carried beat up guitars, some in their cases, some just by their straps or over their backs. One guy carried his alto saxophone in his arms like an infant, and another in a kilt carried his accordion like it was a set of bagpipes.

Some carried sheet music and choreography charts. Some mumbled their skits or lines. Some stared through the open doors, wondering if they should just leave, go outside, dejectedly, and contemplate the San Francisco Bay and the Golden Gate Bridge. Some trudged in and immediately sat slumped in the chairs, trying to be patient and not so timorous.

One paced at the rear of the theater, as if waiting for a jury's verdict.

A ventriloquist mouthed his lines silently while absent-mindedly moving his dummy's jaw, then even taking his handkerchief out and blowing his dummy's nose.

The couple in turquoise, cochineal and browns practiced their jazz moves down the the back of the auditorium, almost reptilian in their motions of silken leaps and twirls and jumps and lifts and elliptical sweeps.

"Please everyone, have a seat. The sign-in sheet from the lobby determines your place in the auditions. Have your music with you, or whatever you need with you, and be ready to perform when we call you," Paula asked the group politely. "I know you know we've seen you before, just be fresh, and confident. You'll do fine."

Paula recalled just then how some artists never tire of rejection, until they get rewards on their own terms.
Performances don't ring any bells
One guy, carrying a Guitar Hero toy, dragged his stage-prop, an old bus depot waiting chair with its coin-operated television set, along with a tangle of wires and black boxes.

He started with a routine of lubricious innuendo, lambasting what we were supposed to believe was a hologram image of Muhammad and venting about the old testament and the Quran. "Creationism, the flood, the earth as a stationary object, the sun revolving around the earth," he ranted, "we believed all this for hundreds of years. Now we're selling the same pablum about ending up in hell through television."

With that he dragged his chair around so everyone could see the tiny image on the screen to whom he was speaking. Ray Charles. "Ray, God rest your soul, but they even accused you of blasphemy at one time." He plugged in the Guitar Hero to a nearby surge protected set of plugs, launching into a barrelhouse rendition of "What'd I Say?" on the guitar (torturing the song, actually: "hey mama, don't you treat me wrong, come and love your daddy all night long" became "hey mama, won't you treat me wrong, tell me who's your daddy all night long").

Simon winced and twirled in his chair, wanting the wretched attempt at humor to cease. "Stop, stop, stop, ple-e-e-ease!" he finally shouted. "That's enough, that's not what you did previously for your first round. And what is this with your toys and this theft from the bus station? We're supposed to believe there's talent here?"

Randy mumbled something about wanting "one of those vaudeville hooks for yanking a louse offstage."

The dancing couple was next to step up, pulling out their musical accompaniment, which, through the Meyer and Renkus-Heinz speakers, sounded as if the musicians were onstage, a relief from the previous canned abomination of sound. "I'm Mark. This is Laura. We're going to do a dance to Turtle Island String Quartet's version of the Coltrane classic, 'A Love Supreme,'" Mark humbly said. "You'll remember." The judges nodded, vaguely trying to be attentive.

The first notes were a weaving of strings using pizzicato punctuation that built upon the original masterpiece for horns and percussion, as Mark and Laura glided across the floor. The judges had not seen them do this music, although they did remember the dancing.

Mark and Laura had moves that left them breathless and they still made the effort to smile for the judges. Their silhouettes were grim, almost all skin and tendons and bones, yet their moves had a muscular fulfillingness.

It reminded Simon of the Tom Waits piece from "Real Gone" a few years back, "Metropolitan Glide" with the lyrical instructions: "Now show your teeth, bray like a calf/Then kill me with your machine gun laugh" (it was difficult for Simon to forget the haunting Waits bourbon-baritone even through this sliding of dance movements and the melodic Coltrane interpretation). Simon scrawled the lyrics onto the voting sheet and showed them to both Randy and Paula, who wrinkled their brows and shook their heads, mystified.

When they finished, the applause was striking from the previous performance's audacity. Paula was first to comment, "I think the rest can go home, that was, again, flawless!"

"Certainly not pimps," Simon said, almost apologetically for his earlier regretted remark. "Reminds me of the old movie, 'They Shoot Horses Don't They?'," he said.

"Which part?" Paula asked, not really wanting to know the answer.

THIS HAS BEEN ANOTHER SPECIAL HOMELESS INTERRUPTION IN YOUR LIFE.
WE NOW RETURN YOU TO YOUR REGULAR EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING, er, BLOG.

26 November 2008

In an actual dystopia, crisis of fiscal matters becoming crisis of confidence becoming crisis of fixity

Misery doesn't love too much company. On any given night, even the homeless grow tired of themselves, sometimes only wanting some solid ground and any shelter from the winds and rain.

Homeless numbers are undeniably intimidating. The U.S. government contends there are between 650,000 to 1.5 million; according to National Alliance to End Homelessness, since most people can't even afford housing as renters, and what with the mortgage lending nearly unavailable, the numbers of homeless are sure to grow.

Passed in August 2008, the American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act, primarily aimed at stemming the tide of foreclosures, set up the National Housing Trust Fund Act, for meeting the shortage of low-income rental housing. At least 90% of the funds must be for the production, preservation, rehabilitation, or operation of rental housing; of that, 75% must benefit extremely low income households, and all funds must benefit very low income households.

However, most importantly, the funds will not be available until mid-2009, according to the National Coalition for the Homeless, the most capable, credible source for recommendations, and the oldest national organization advocating with and on behalf of persons experiencing homelessness.

No one can deny the economy's troubles. For over a decade we have witnessed the relentless buildup of the financial crisis, a steady strangulation by credit markets, starting with subprime mortgage-backed securities, spreading to commercial paper, then to interbank credit, and then to CDOs, CLOs, jumbo mortgages, home equity lines of credit, LBOs and private equity markets, and then generally to the bond and securities markets, all aligning like street corner jewelry hustlers in front of the payday lender stores, a communal blight.

We the people now retain a radical accountability, not mere responsibility for which we could allay blame or soothe worries, dependent on the secretary saviors of government.
As if we hadn't been through enough hell
Bleak indications show that we are not over our soma vacations of the financial crises, until we can step away from the tube and the social media blasting their messages of trying to instill confidence and fixity ("there is no final revolution; revolutions are infinite" is what we tell ourselves). Continuing on Wall Street and Main Street and across the world, the crisis is compelling to watch, yet miserable to endure.

No quick fix is at hand, except to think for ourselves, to quorum our solution without the foxes in the henhouse.

Global real estate overvaluation, indebtedness, leverages after foreclosures of leverages, outstanding derivatives, global bubbles, and the precariousness of the global monetary system suggest that we are in a come-to-Jesus Greater Depression.

"In the U.S., Federal, State and municipal governments are increasingly in a straightjacket, under the tight control of the global financial conglomerates," says Michel Chossudovsky, one of the main global watchdogs, considering the Federal Reserve and the IMF-World Bank maneuvers.

All the usual suspects and demagogues will be controlling the mess, the secretary saviors: Larry Summers, Timothy Geithner, Jon Corzine, Paul Volcker, Stanley Fischer, Phil Gramm, Ben Bernanke, Hank Paulson, Robert Rubin, Alan Greenspan, even such emissaries as Warren Buffett, Joseph Steiglitz and Vernon Jordan, as ever, are on their marks, smiling for the camera, spreading their calm, smiles under which are often ice (some know what it's like when hell freezes over).

No forthcoming epiphany or innovation expects to shift for healing our broken trust.

Amazing Grace seems to vibrate into a palpable choir of voices from nowhere. The people in the church kitchens start coming out of their serving lines, beaming gratitude for their ability to give. Across the city, resentment and frustration and disdain reverberate like a black Cadillac Escalade shimmering its reflections of the passing streetlights and oncoming traffic, as the politicos pass, shadowy, same as it ever was.

No one cares about the actual dystopian emptiness of our culture, its entheogenic-induced, meaningless passivity and its insatiable desire for distraction.

What has been developing is a tyranny in the guise of order and progress for the sake of social stability, making it easier to commodify people.

We know the growing $53 trillion federal debt is of a magnitude few understand; IOUSA tries to give the scope ("some material may not be suitable for children"): each American owes $175,000, as of 2008, and the interest grows.

President-elect Obama announced today creation of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, a new institution for governmental accountability for the financial crisis. "Sometimes policy-making in Washington can become a little bit too ingrown," Obama said. "The walls of the echo chamber can sometimes keep out fresh voices and new ways of thinking. This board will provide that fresh perspective to me and my administration, with an infusion of ideas from across the country and from all sectors of our economy."
Homeless paraphernalia must be kept to a minimum
The night before Thanksgiving, rain had been imminent. Cody and Jen were with their two dogs, Shep and Might, so they knew the shelters were out of the question and the only SROs available weren't going to allow Shep and Might.

Without it becoming a criminal case, Cody and Jen found their way under one of the freeway camps under the James Lick 101 approach to Octavia and Market. "Police aren't as concerned lately about us homeless people, as they've been with the Prop 8 protesters" Jen told me; she had just voted two weeks ago, so she knew what the current politics were. "We could hear their drums and chants while we were just trying to find a warm place to sleep." Some nights they'd found places accommodating all of them. Other nights, not. "Being homeless doesn't mean you can't vote," Jen said. "It just means you have to be registered someplace. Under a freeway won't do. For the dogs, though, it's fine."

There had been an opening in the fences under the Octavia offramp, behind the moving vans near McCoppin and Valencia, so they'd easily found a spot through which they could crawl to a space where they would camp. "Not the quietest spot, but it's dry and protected from the wind," said Cody. "The dogs hardly minded and went straight to sleep."

Traffic thudded above them, yet somehow they had been able to doze off. A flashlight woke them just after midnight two hours later, and cops rousted them from the spot just as it began to rain.

"Gather up your belongings and all this homeless paraphernalia," the one cop said (paraphernalia being their tarps and makeshift tents, their belongings being their backpacks and the dogs; neither of them did drugs, so their downward glances quickly undid any fears of needles or glass pipes for which they might be busted). They were directed to the nearby city shelter drop-in center, 150 Otis. "And don't be trespassing your deadbeat asses here again."

They walked off to 150 Otis, where they would sleep in chairs (in shifts so someone could take care of Shep and Might). "So much for making do with our utopia for the night," Cody said, looking back over his shoulder at the cops getting into the patrol car.


23 November 2008

Sordid details of a homeless sperm donor making rent

Larry had needed cash to make rent. Now I know, second hand, so to speak, what it's like to be a sperm donor.

I haven't known Larry long; we have been more or less mere street acquaintances.

He'd asked me to accompany him on "an appointment." I'd assumed why he couldn't do the procedure by himself had to do with medical requirements, perhaps about needing sedation, being dizzy afterwards; simply, he needed to have a companion, like when they draw blood at blood banks. Then Larry told me the whole story.

Several months ago, he'd initially been tested for "any known infectious diseases," while having his blood sampled, "way beyond the usual tests," such as for chlamydia, gonorrhea, hepatitis B/C, HIV, and syphilis; with any signs, he'd have been disqualified from participation in the blood donor program, which he'd been using every week. There had been an intensive questionnaire for him then to determine further uses for his "bodily fluids," and strange inquisitions about his heroes, hobbies and favorite pastimes, his PTA affiliations, whether he'd ever had children, whether they'd played soccer.
Your great grandmother's mother's mother's maiden name
Larry had divulged everything, everything up to his becoming homeless.

He'd graduated from Stanford with an MBA. He'd worked at startups, with affiliations to Lawrence Labs, MIT and Los Alamos. He was on a first name basis with geeks from Silicon Valley to Research Triangle Park, on top of gizmos and widgets development from Cambridge to Hong Kong, having an inside take on tech-engineering and its impact on the world.

Knowing that the IT budget cuts worldwide for this year alone were in the range of $200-400 billion, Larry wasn't discouraged, and yet he wasn't pleased to be in the spot he was, financially having been part of the 2001 bubble's burst and now part of the latest Greater Depression's castoffs. He knew what could happen and he wasn't about to become one of the destitute without a plan. At 33, still at the peak of his life, he had a tenacity. He was going to make use of his 6'2" brown-haired, green-eyed, 175 pounds of vibrancy.

For this cryobank (this repository for sperm donors where specimens would be frozen for later distribution and use), Larry also had to undergo a complete family history evaluation, which might have indicated that his offspring could have increased risk for birth defects or known genetic conditions; he was also to detail, confidentially yet as completely as possible, any alcohol use, tobacco use, drug use, tattooing history, how well he slept, his regular diet, what medicines he'd ever used, what bones he may have broken, whether he'd exchanged sex for money, whether he snorted cocaine, what the normal length of his refractory periods were.

"All before ever becoming a sperm donor... you believe this invasion?" Larry remarked, describing the procedures to which he'd been subjugated. "All on the down-low."
Swimmers, swimmers, swimmers
Larry was also to ascertain his ability, on cue, to laugh or to smile, to tilt his head for any incidence of stiffness, whether he could do a strange theatrical pointing gesture with his akimbo stance, then a wave, as well as assessing the range and the cadence and intonation of his voice, since a capacity to mimic were all measurable attributes, as were the natural inclinations of human capacity he could reveal.

And Larry was to see if he'd been a carrier of Gaucher disease, Fanconi anemia, Niemann-Pick disease, Canavan disease, or thalassemia, most of which he'd never known much less lifted or carried.

Then there were the tests a doctor does without you knowing the reasons, stroking the temporomandibular joint for casual reflexes, then tapping his knee joint for the expected kick, even rubbing the ribcage just short of tickling.

Larry was, by his own admission, a bit of a curmudgeon with a ruddy yet borderline pallid skin tone, a tendency to anti-social behavior (though he only described his ways as shyness), and a handshake, by my own admission, that sometimes gets rather clammy.

He'd had to check off or list symptoms―hoarseness, warts, blood in stool, goiter, tingling, dizziness, fainting, convulsions, seizures, tremor, numbness―after which he had been invited for an interview, where he had then produced a semen sample for analysis; when that was satisfactory, he'd returned for more semen analyses and a physical. Only if Larry passed those would he then qualify as a donor.

He'd had a renal ultrasound. His sperm during the subsequent weeks would be counted, frozen, thawed, and recounted, spectrum-analyzed for their motility―how well they swam―and all his spermatozoa would be tested and retested.
Biological tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock
The anonymity of a cryobank is its primary selling point, much as if buying rainboots or instructional manuals off the Web, ensuring total confidentiality (once you get past the credit card transaction).

One morning, as he'd been instructed, Larry called the chief lab technician. "I was about to call you," she'd said. "I have some good news. You passed the freezing and thawing. We want to make arrangements for your second trial specimen―that is, if you are still interested."

"Of course." He couldn't resist asking, "So what were my numbers? What was the count?"

"108," she'd said. "On the high side." Larry told me he'd blushed.

Sperm banks, unlike pornographers, keep everything discreet.

Crossing his fingers for the big bucks, which had meant no ejaculations for a few days, waiting until he had clearance for any further testing, Larry was patient as the appropriate time had lapsed, knowing that he could resume eating regularly and continue with all his ordinary activities.

Now that the genetic counselor, donor manager, laboratory manager, and the medical director passed him as a potential candidate for the donor program, he could now jack off to his heart's content for cash.

I didn't even know why he'd asked me to join him; "just indulge me in this little bit of self-indulgent business," he'd asked.

"Well," I shrugged, "what's in it for me?"

Larry and I came to the offices of the cryobank where they'd collect his sperm, an unimposing gray building at the foot of Telegraph Hill (with Coit Tower acting as a beacon). We made it down an elevator into a maze of hallways where we found the cryobank reception area.

The chief lab technician, who introduced herself to me as Virginia, smiled politely and demurely to Larry. "Please wait here," she said to me with a rather passive expression.

"Right this way," she said to Larry as she led him down a hallway and through some massive doors that seemed to shut like being sealed into a spaceship ("more like entering a catacombs," Larry later disclosed).
Naughty, naughty, naughty bits
They walked to a room where he would, um, masturbate.

Larry saw a Murphy bed, and against a wall were a plasma TV and a DVD player on top of a huge table. Virginia pointed Larry to the bathroom with its sink; "use the anti-bacterial soap and afterwards dry yourself thoroughly," she directed (sperm die in water), "and here," she said, opening a cabinet, "KY jelly for your lubrication needs."

She showed him on another wall a door hidden behind a hinged picture―"this naked woman, looking over her shoulder provocatively, something like those velvet paintings you see at flea markets," was how Larry described what guarded the door for a chute into which he would deposit his specimen.

Virginia pointed Larry to the table under the TV, where there were the expected stacks of magazines―Genesis, Hawk, Squirm, Nang Sue Pok Kao (Bangkok White Cover Book), Club, Swank, Taboo―and the dozen or so naughty DVDs with a binder cataloging their titles; she showed him how to operate the DVD player itself. "She nodded at me with what I suspect was a wink then and she closed the door," Larry told me.

I'd been having to sit there, reading the reception area's stock marketing literature. A typical cryobank in California, being one of the largest sperm banks in the country, one of the slick handouts revealed, ships 10,000 vials of sperm monthly, each good for one insemination. Elsewhere, I read they'd charge women or couples needing fertilization $3000, and likely upwards, for the services; I knew from my own experience that single women especially choose to conceive with donor sperm, as lesbian couples have been doing for many years―adoption is costly, slow-moving and often biased against single people.

All in all with cryobank operations, I was rediscovering what's always true of every little bit of big business: there are always dirty little secrets.

"Your friend will be right with you," Virginia told me as she came through the catacomb doors and greeted me in the reception area, "after he does his business." I didn't see her wink at me or give me the polite smile.

The next few minutes passed as one would suppose and are none of our business.

Except to say all I did was sit in the reception area and wait for Larry.

He told me he was just paid $225.

So much for the preservation of a species.


21 November 2008

Thinking outside the box: where does the time go―what's to do when it's up?

Taking it all in, getting a baptismal immersion, an osmosis, a permeable facing of secrets of enlightenment, giving into a celestial emersion of thoughts―762 jailed persons per 100,000 residents, compared to Canada's 108, or France's 91, and almost two-thirds of them seemingly destined for re-arrest―there just must be a different labyrinth of behavior to practice, in order to avoid being caught up in the world of crime in America.

"The United States has less than 5% of the world's population, but it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners," notes Adam Liptak in the International Herald Tribune (China, which is four times more populous than the United States, is a distant second, with 1.6 million people in prison).

When one in every 100 Americans is in prison and one in 15 being African American, we wonder of the solutions.

Let homeless fend for themselves or put them in prisons and jails until they straighten out their misspent lives and aberrant ways? Let kids on the street languish without social after-school activities or put them in situations where they learn how the underworld changes their naturally rebellious ways?

Lay off school teachers or stop subsidizing the illegal marijuana business with billions of dollars in tax breaks? Lay off workers and close factories or let non-violent offenders out of prison and provide treatment to drug addicts?
Society encourages wasted lives
Back in 1966, I remember Chief of Police Thomas Cahill wanting to keep the hippies out of San Francisco, because of just so much depravity: the unbridled sex ("all that summer of love talk"), dope ("acid and all that mind-bending marijuana") and flowers in their hair ("all that crazy rock and roll, which has no redeeming value"), all which would have led inevitably to encouraging wasted lives.

By 1966, I had already fled the looking glass rabbit hole of psychedelic San Francisco; the following year, what had been thousands had become hundreds of thousands, utopia had become nightmare: paddy wagons drove through the Haight dragging youth off to jails, simply for being too young to be there without supervision, or under the influence of the free drugs, which would eventually become junk and crank, or for practicing the forbidden free love, which would become rife with STDs and spreading the land with overcrowded foster child homes.

Proposition 6 from the recent election could have been in place back then and I'd have ended up on a whole different lifestyle.

This year our fight was not limited to federal legislation; we saw the defeat of Proposition 6―a horrendous California ballot initiative that would have criminalized youths through massive revisions to the state's juvenile justice codes. Children's Defense Fund worked nationally to stop "lock 'em up" legislation, favoring punitive measures for children and youths over preventive investments.

Under the pretense of creating "safer neighborhoods," Proposition 6 could have changed current law to require that more children, as young as 14 years old, be tried and sentenced as adults. Simply for reckless behavior, or for being runaways.

Our prisons may now finally release those who've had drug convictions, since the prisons are too overcrowded. Still, if the drugs were as cheap as candy, perhaps users would not need to resort to criminal activity to pay for their fixes. However, refusing to impose treatment, denying that which an incarcerated addict actually needs to overcome addiction's hardships and critical helplessness, is ultimately only cruel. The problems sustain the problems.

So yes, courts will soon decide solutions and maybe show the problems in the light of day (or at the least, inside a courtroom's flourescent glare).
What society approves, and voters could have supported
This year Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed two prison reforms far more radical than anything in the recently rejected Proposition 5: the mass release of 22,000 nonviolent inmates, and a new paper-only parole status for nonviolent inmates after release from prison, which he called "summary parole," which would entail no active supervision. 5 would have required up to one year of active supervision for most nonviolent parolees, yet it could have provided for drastic drops in California's recidivism rate (now at 70%, or twice the national average).

The California Correctional Peace Officers Association, which represents more than 30,000 prison guards, joined with the inmates' rights attorneys, a rare twist of fate, in seeking to reduce the prison population. Deukmejian, Wilson, Brown and Davis had all had the same problems with prisons, the goon guard union. No one challenges their rule within California. Whatever they want, they get, due to their expensive support of their choices in politics. None of the governors had ever thought of building more prisons until business taught them such needs. Now guards want the opposite.

California puts a higher percentage of its citizens in jail than any country in the world. There's a rich business in such practice. Last year we had 2.3 million Americans in prison and jail. California has about 175,000 of those of its population incarcerated.

1.5 million children have a parent in state or federal prison―that's more than 2% of all children―convicted of no crime yet paying the price for this system's inhumanity. 75% of the inmates are parents. From two to nine million children never see their parents outside of prison, if they ever get to meet them at all.
More justice pending?
Federal judges already have ruled that medical and mental health care is so poor in California prisons that it violates constitutional standards, sometimes contributing to inmates' deaths.

If the court system determines that overcrowding is the cause, it could order the early release of thousands of inmates, a move opposed by the Schwarzenegger administration.

The upcoming trial to decide the outcome is the first time judges have acted under the 1995 federal Prison Litigation Reform Act. The law limits judges' powers in inmate rights cases, allowing courts to order the early release of inmates only if a special judicial panel decides there are no other options.

The Schwarzenegger administration argues that prison conditions are improving, pointing to thousands of inmates being transferred to private prisons out of state. The state also noted that annual spending on inmate health care has soared in recent years, from $2,700 per inmate to nearly $14,000.

Attorneys for the state said releasing some 50,000 inmates would endanger public safety without solving the problem. Prison guards who testified disagreed, saying many prisoners were being endangered because of the overcrowded conditions.

Some severely mentally ill inmates wait more than a year to be transferred to California Department of Mental Health facilities because the state lacks sufficient beds. In the meantime, they sometimes are placed in cells with other inmates who prey on them.

Most of those in prison are there for non-violent offenses like drugs or theft or writing bad checks, or because they violated probation by committing a "technical" violation like drinking or using drugs or not meeting the strict rules of providing child support. Most of those in prison are there much longer than they need be to deter crime, in order to punish them by the just standards in place, or to protect society supposedly from future crime.
Being locked up can be a hard thing to swallow
Our culture's diversity is a blessing. While our nation's principle edict is that we are all equal, what is relic is that some are more equal than others. We live in a society that believes that it can buy and consume most anything, even humans. And much of what we take in, figuratively or literally, leaves us numb and distracted from the rugged, demanding realities of this world. Even the expected routines of confinement make it hard to swallow the pride or the forthcoming remorse. The lump in our throats is not diminishing. Confinement can be like a cancer, always threatening.

As it turns out, the one thing that we cannot afford is indifference. We need to recognize that it is not just video games and Hollywood that present a challenge, or a social aberrance to which we have intolerance. Even our love of God or our love of music can be coupled with individual and institutional aristocracy, or a sense of superiority, almost as if we feel entitled to banish ourselves into a purgatory on earth. Therefore we must ask ourselves what our culture, in all its varied manifestations, is making of us.
Indifference to suffering is what makes the human being inhuman.

Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred. Anger can be creative: one writes a great poem, a great symphony, one does something special for the sake of humanity because one is angry at the injustice that one witnesses.

Indifference is never creative. Even hatred at times may elicit a response. You fight it. You denounce it. You disarm it. Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response.

Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end.

Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment.


"Perils of Indifference" by Elie Wiesel (excerpt)

What do we want for society's outcasts?
Most people I've met in shelters or the SROs throughout San Francisco readily admit their daily intention is first to find stable income and to find stable accommodation. Only one in a dozen would prefer living with such conditions as they face being homeless, since without stability, one is rarely able to reciprocate; it's always taking and waiting, and never giving (having nothing to give except a helping hand).

Hungry, without shelter or a place even for the day to call home, down and out, there are those of us who are not willing to give up. We are the resilient who persevere through circumstances of fear and dread and hope.

To those I've managed to reach in such predicaments, I've learned what enables survival when dealing with constant upheaval.

Women and children have attributed their homelessness to a wide range of factors; the most common is a relationship breakdown, then, unemployment or lack of dependable income, while some admitted their homelessness to inability to deal with psychiatric issues.

When asked what they liked about shelters or SROs, most men could rarely think of something they actually liked, only that they dreaded worse circumstances. The two most valued features of shelters or SROs related to a non-intrusive style, and the perceived support and community atmosphere, or both of these impressions. The main dislikes concerned institutional rigidity and constraints, the deteriorated interior structure of the building and "living with the mentally ill."

Lack of privacy, of course, is the most obvious frustration by shelter residents, and may well be one of the more oppressive aspects to those who've left, never to return.

Of those who've done time, reality of their actions or inactions can lead them back to what they want to avoid.

Prisons never provide for privacy. Everyone's intimate secrets become viciously public, no matter if the inclinations are sexual, addictive or simply vulnerable protective tendencies.

California simply can't afford to incarcerate all non-violent offenders. As taxpayers, most of us would rather pay for treatment, or even for the drugs, if an addict cannot quit; personal use and possession of drugs should be decriminalized because it represents a victimless crime. Drugs should be legalized and sold as commodities since society has no viable means to prevent drug use. We've spent billions on the unwinnable war on drugs and we're no nearer to victory today then when Nixon declared the war some 40 years ago.

And for those who have children, it seems like such insanity to never share their blessing, instead to pass on the same legacy.

Before we're banished to some wretched place, it would have been nice to have had a taste of home. Maybe the generational revolving door at our prisons will get us to a different destiny.


16 November 2008

Neocons exploit and deprive, trying to destroy unity

Across California and the United States Saturday, millions protested. With their rights being exploited and deprived by the silently growing neo-conservative confluence, they knew they couldn't stay silent.

Indifference and intolerance are undeniably widespread, remaining the best weapons for destroying unity, unless people think. A sense of belonging continues to sustain the ethical reasons to join a movement, movements bringing the unity to change social inequities.

Straights, couples and others circled around San Francisco's Civic Center and UN Plaza, waiting for a planned demonstration to happen.

People carried hand-drawn signs to add to the familiar ones used in the election. Some didn't make much sense ("the Bible says you shouldn't eat shellfish... so why do you?"), some were off-point with no clear stance ("children do better socially with stability"), and some were plainly unreadable.

Wearing everything from "Human Rights for Everyone" t-shirts to camouflage pajamas, people dressed as devils, chickens and skeletons cloaked in black. Chanting, blowing trumpets and pounding drums, they had come together through social networking, using the Web, text messages, direct outreach through friends, cellphones and word of mouth.
Equality and justice are still the forces that work
"Just because we'd lost in the electoral process," said one of the passersby, "doesn't mean we've lost our reason."

Around noon, finally, a commotion emerged to support the event's draw. Organizers began to tap the microphones and discuss who would address the crowd.

"Ya lost, get over it!" a young jogger passing just then shouted derisively. "Get off your soapbox!"

The assembling faces turned, collective-jaws dropped.

There was no response as the jogger disappeared across Grove street and down underground into the BART station. A new generation still has the old generation's sentiments and its intolerance, yet there are those who cannot allow the hatred to continue its inequality and unfairness.

LGBTQI had clamored for their rights, and the powerless, such as the homeless, stood beside them. "Equal rights now!" the crowd of 2000 chanted moving towards the steps of San Francisco's City Hall.

A roar of approval erupted once speeches began to lead the crowds at City Hall (estimated by noon to have grown to over 5000 people, although dispersed and sparsely clustered); the spontaneous viral messaging for the event was partly to account for the lack of focus. There was an obvious order to the seeming chaos.

Among the speakers who managed to rally the throngs were politicians (Congressional Representative Barbara Lee, State Senator-Elect Mark Leno, Assemblyman-Elect Tom Ammiano, and Senator Carole Migden), ministers (Reverend Amos Brown and Dr. Penny Nixon), gay Mormons and Christians, along with parents, straight, gay and lesbian, with their children.

"They hate us," Migden reminded. "Let's just acknowledge it."

"Everyone today is queer!" Ammiano quipped. "Even Arnold Schwarzenegger is a queen today!"

The former stand-up got his laughs then ceded to the seriousness.

"We have the momentum and they are hanging on by a thread," said Leno. "This is a democracy, not a theocracy."

"It is time to get our country back on track!" urged Lee.

All were there of course for the cause at hand.

They remembered people like Hank Wilson, who'd fought for the down and out (or, as ACTUP and IMPACT history reminds us, the not-yet-out).

Hank Wilson died last Sunday, 9 Novemeber. He'd watched over the community at the Ambassador Hotel in the Tenderloin. Hank had his all-queer staff of drag queens, pre-op and post-op transsexuals, dykes and fags, queers of all colors, those fighting AIDS.

He'd almost singlehandedly changed the way San Francisco dealt with homelessness, providing homeless services beyond what the city agencies were enabling to those dying or suffering and unable to surrender to the bigotry. Such indifference and intolerance still pervades the nation, and still suffocates San Francisco. Yet Hank knew how to keep a home a safe place.

Hank also started Tenderloin AIDS Resource Center (TARC), serving breakfast to those dying from lack of care. It was his sense of community to which he would stubbornly cling that gave him salvageability to the end, a spirit that almost refused to die. Bob Ostertag had remembered, even as he mourned, how Hank had told kindergarden students, "a community was something that took care of its least privileged members, if this simple thing could not be done, then you didn't have much in the way of community."

Coming together Saturday was a way to define the feelings shared by an emerging concern: when one right is diminished, more will be taken, just like lives in an unjust war.

"We put salt on everyone's wounds when we scapegoat and place blame," warned Dr. Penny Nixon, a minister at the Metropolitan Community Church. "We cannot speak about each other in this way. It will kill us."

Marchers after the rally needed direction, since some went towards Castro, others towards SoMa, others toward the Embarcadero. This was no Pride Parade. Some were even arrested when they blocked Octavia for the 101 freeway traffic.
Unity is still hard to contain as it grows
"If we can't be with those we love, the next step is that we can't be, that's how the conservatives'd like to have it," one anonymous protester shouted through her bullhorn Saturday. "And to think of how many people $20 million could have fed with the money spent to support 8's ban!" she continued. Her voice was lost in the din.

"Though I am a baptist, I am not a bigot!" decried Rev. Amos Brown from the Third Baptist Church. "People have rights, no matter what the church believes."

News helicopters still hovered overhead, creating a ruckus and making it difficult for people to carry on conversations.

"A conversation that blames is a conversation that looks backward and does nothing to build bridges," said Kate Kendell, executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights. Her coalitions like many had helped spread the word that our Constitution is in danger.

Should one issue enable the weakening of rights that laws provide, the steamrolling nature of the powerful base (behind such initiatives as this 21st century version of the Briggs initiative, Proposition 8) will prevail. Subtle twists of reason, such as protecting children from immoral or indecent mandates, seem to level the building of rights back to a wasteland of undermining America's freedom. Children need focus, and direction, and love. With parents who love, they get it, regardless of the sex.

No one can say why love matters, especially within a family. Love just is.

America has grown used to its having freedoms, and citizens are not content when such rights are deliberately diminished by powerful backdoor manipulations.

Mobilizing the voters, both young and old who gave Barack Obama his historic victory, meant working to protect "a new set of values based on sharing and compassion rather than the 'greed is good' principle that has dominated the national landscape for nearly thirty years," Randy Shaw, the Tenderloin Housing Clinic Executive Director, clarified.

From San Francisco to Manhattan, from Jacksonville to Spokane, from Little Rock to Salinas, our spirit sometimes just needs a sense of unity.

Planning for the nationwide protests started by a Seattle blogger, Amy Balliett. She created a blog, JoinTheImpact (a place where people post information about anti-Prop. 8 events in their own cities; Wetpaint hosts the site), where she writes: "America’s population is 301,109,947 people. Given the statistic that 10% of the population is LGBTQ, imagine if all 30 million of us had just 10 conversations. Now imagine if we had one every day! This movement is about all of us working toward one goal of outreach, education, and full equality. If we work together, we can change minds, change laws, and change lives!"

One of many believing in the power of protest, I felt the one missing essential was an icon for the unity, an identifying face, like Mahatma Ghandi, or Martin Luther King, or Susan B. Anthony, or Cesar Chavez, or Harvey Milk, all whose magnifying decisions and hard work shaped modern America and the world: it took their hard work to keep the multitudes on course.

Someone in whose faith we can believe, someone we can trust, someone with whom we can identify.


14 November 2008

America can't hide from outcasts

Looking, from New York City's Lower East Side facing north, at the landscapes of Midtown, the East River, Brooklyn and Queens, Shaya was telling me, during our cellphone conversation, how it felt to be across the continent, with the same same-sex marriage protests happening there, the same amount of poverty there, the same ingrained contempt for government, the only difference being the magnitude of the social outrage.

It's all the same visceral reaction of shame or frustration all across America, sometimes it's so apparent, people's moods are transparent (there's always the same programming on the television). Almost as if someone's shouting off-camera, "makeup!" People are walking around like they're broadcasts, while looking at those who they treat as outcasts, and the pathos sweeps over like a camera's pan, this capturing of having had and lost and of the wonder on faces of whether they'll ever have again.

Shaya told me of the Kenneth Cole billboard along the West Side Highway, announcing Obama's victory:
A PRECEDENT WE CAN BE PROUD OF.
      ―KENNETH COLE
CONGRATULATIONS BARACK OBAMA.
Shaya told me how there's the meeting next week for Kenneth Cole with Mayor Newsom (download the podcast, or right-click here to save the file), detailing a nationwide message, a new charity campaign.

This new campaign, AWEARNESS from Kenneth Cole, grew out of being a charitable initiative originally meant to provide help solutions to amfAR (AIDS research/solutions development) and HelpUSA (homelessness/poverty programs for self-reliancy); see AWEARNESS: The Kenneth Cole Blog.

The main issues of AWEARNESS are:
  • "Hard Times" (poverty, unemployment, homelessness, social insecurity)
  • "Political Landscape" (regime change, economic momentum, exclusivity, ethics)
  • "Social Rights" (equality, moral injustices, discriminating against discrimination)
  • "Well-Being" (AIDS, pollution, global warming, bird flu, medical bills)
Shaya was telling me about this drive as I had a television on in the background, watching the Country Music Awards. The charge on my cellphone was getting low. Watching television the other night was a rare occurrence for me, considering the content.
America's Main Street shows its best costumes and everyday hats
A decade ago, I couldn't pick Kenny Chesney or Brad Paisley out in a lineup. Now they're enormous country music stars, as big as their hats in whatever part of the world they go; so, all in all, the Country Music Awards show wasn't what I'd expected. A decade ago, I'd have only been familiar with someone like Reese Witherspoon or George Strait. My interest in country music pretty much failed after my allegiance to Johnny Cash or Willie Nelson. As with much of American culture, there have been significant developments.

Change. Not just in the channels.

I described what I was seeing to Shaya, and she couldn't believe I had any interest, seeing as how I rarely watch television anyway and knowing my level of country music knowledge.

Onscreen, in a leather minidress, gothic necklace and dominatrix boots, Kellie Pickler was singing "I was head over heels till you threw us away."

Martina McBride did "Ride" (with the lyrics, "you can hide beneath the covers").

Backed by a thundering banjo-driven group, Rodney Atkins grabbed us with "It's America" (in which he celebrates "a high school prom, a Springsteen song, a ride in a Chevrolet, a man on the moon, fireflies in June").

Chesney performed "Everybody Wants to Go to Heaven" with The Wailers (afterwards, with them segueing into Bob Marley's "Three Little Birds").

Darius Rucker, from Hootie and the Blowfish fame, sang his "Don't Think I Don't Think About It" (afterward, rumor had it he'd spotted one of the country giants staring at him onstage as he began the song: "I start looking at the crowd and the first thing I notice is George Strait looking at me playing," Rucker said, "...surreal, for me!").

Sugarland were a strange couple in their 1920s flapper costumes; they'd been in the running for an award (for "Stay," an aching ballad about betrayal), which was nominated for single of the year, yet ended up losing to Strait's "I Saw God Today" (a ballad about seeing God in nature or a newborn baby).

I thought I was just seeing a hint of crossover, which I thought never happens in country music.

Then, there were the Eagles, the biggest crossover band in music, doing a "Long Road Out of Eden" finale (Glenn Frye, Don Henley, Timothy Schmidt, and Joe Walsh, dapper in their finest suits, singing "all the knowledge in the world is of no use to fools").

I'm sure the television Gods were watching, along with the NSA, the Taliban and COINTELPRO; in the background of the cellphone conversation, I heard beeping, which I had to remember was only a signal of the charge getting low on my end.


12 November 2008

Rhemes of faceless, lost, homeless, lonely, make us wonder of our domestic hearth

Homeless sometimes don't even feel their predicament has a rheme worth considering, that they're irrelative, numbers without meaning to everyone.

For what San Francisco has as an official "Homeless definition," I know there are those like me who barely need such clarification. Our loneliness can make that definition's reality, which only sustains the government entities that are supposed to help us overcome such circumstances, put us into even more despair.

Even our cellphones do not rid us of that loneliness of feeling our humanness lost. The Web tries, yet only if we have the perseverance and resilience to be able to use its resources, and to end our loneliness and, hence, our homelessness.

For those of us living in such circumstances, loneliness is a core hardship when facing homelessness. We feel like pariahs.

Comprehensively.

Growing numbers question the standards that the local, state and federal governments carry. Yet even in numbers, we feel alone as homeless, competing for food, shelter, resources.

When realities become so pervasive that we need no definition, that we are embodying the focus, we must change our values.

I think of the definition, originally, yet now lost, of focus, as a "domestic hearth." Home being our focus requires our participation as a family. Making daily meals, going to work, school, social functions. When the family bonds break, we lose focus, especially when we, as a family, lose our home, we lose focus. When we as a community lose our focus, homes become a risk. Everyone wants one. Our solidarity threatens the community's leaders, especially when the leaders protect themselves from us, and society suddenly, nearly irretrievably, becomes lost.
Even chance encounters with homeless make us question our humanity
Mario passed me yesterday, at dusk in UN Plaza at Civic Center, with his ice cream cart. I couldn't afford ice cream yet I pointed him to a mother who needed a treat for her children.

Mario thanked me and walked off, ringing his cart's bells and approached the woman and her children.

Gilbert, intoxicated, introduced himself suddenly to me, asked me then for a cigarette, which I didn't have, then for a dollar, to which I told him I was broke, homeless myself, that there was free food nearby for anyone. I'd pointed. "Don't point," he warned me. I told him I had to go. He would not take me at my word, that I had nothing for him, except pointing and a prayer. "I don't want your prayers," Gilbert said, "I want your money."

I thought to use my cellphone. Instead, I had to walk away towards Mario, knowing the confrontation would be less likely with someone witnessing the encounter, the shakedown.

Mario had the mother and children to serve, yet he smiled at me, and Gilbert, seeing the bond, disappeared.

I was shaking my head with wonder this Veteran's Day.

We could easily forget the divisiveness of our history, the indifference to equality, in the ignoring of race in America, the political upheavals forging slavery into our nation's founding documents, requiring the Civil War, the Civil Rights movement, and what's manifest in hearts of millions this past November 4, as millions walked into the voting booth.

Yet there are children, watching their televisions, holding their game consoles, wanting to do anything but their homework, yet listening to their world, developing and changing, differently than their parents.

We have something else to which we listen, a language of sorting and gathering and making sense, of change and hope that's been, figuratively or literally, out of our grasp. Not out of our depth, for a child understands the indifference and contempt; they just don't have the words for it, so they just call it hate.

And children learn how to pick their battles, not because the news takes up too much of the broadcast time cutting into their cartoons, more because of the simple frustration with not knowing why we fight someone else's wars, not getting what's in it for us.

I met a father and his young son asking me where to get food. I walked them back over to the makeshift operation serving divine Nepali food; "Curry Without Worry" serves meals to anyone who wants on Tuesday evenings (nine bean-sprouted soup, vegetable curry, naan, Basmati rice, yogurt and tomato/timmur chutney, the "nine jewels and five elements of Napali soul food"). I'd just finished eating, so as I walked with them to the location to which I'd pointed Gilbert and while they ate, we talked about 21st century homelessness survival.

Walter, the father, had fought with the 19th Airborne in Afghanistan, and just when he returned, he had lost his wife to a drunk driver's traffic negligence, then he'd lost his home, nearly lost his son, found himself sleeping in a cot in a crowded homeless shelter in San Francisco (150 Otis), suffering with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), making it difficult if not almost impossible to hold down a job, with no practical experience except what the military provided, reconnaissance behind enemy lines; his comfortability with social customs is beyond his familiar judgment. "I 'on't reckon they's much call here fer someun's jumpin' outta planes and tellin' ya where's the enemy," Walter confided. "Times I feel I'm no more'n a number. Me an' Justin."

"Some nights, the whole world's all against us," said his son, Justin, who rather liked the food he was eating. "All we want's a bed, some food, and maybe a TV."

"Yeah, well, we needs a bathroom and a kitchen, too," Walt reminded Justin, tousling his hair.

Local facilities had been full and the two didn't want to separate. Living on the streets, in alleyways or under any awning, not disturbing anyone, they'd managed. The weather had been so far sparing them too much misery. Mostly all they had to reconcile was the social contempt.

We who are homeless are often seen as "less than worthy of attention, lost in statistics, almost better off dead."

Still, vulnerable, and so much for selfless sacrifice to one's country having any reciprocal value.

Homeless must remember every moment that they are not alone, faceless, another one of the countless troops, just rhemes of uselessness to ignore.


10 November 2008

Scorn protects the intolerant and suspicious (thinking they're avoiding raving loons and smelly bums going through their trash)

Emptiness in his stomach was more than starving urges. Millard's problem wasn't his competency to eat nutritionally, or properly; his stomach was growling from anxiety.

Millard had a tendency to get his nutrition free, as a dumpster diver, an urban forager, a modern hunter/gatherer, knowing the amount of edible, usable food that businesses and institutions throw away, since they can't legally sell it. He preached how where it all ends up in giant metal trash receptacles or in landfills, or worse, that the food is just wasted, not even becoming compost.

Millard usually worked with Food Not Bombs and his other SFHomeless friends to get his food.

Having learned where to go and which alleys to frequent, he had a means to avoid the soup kitchen lines and other outlets where there was competition for food. Certain dumpsters were safe, of course, and certain ones were as risky as sewers.

Often he'd work alone. He knew it was best to work in pairs or teams.

Millard had his rivals, aside from the vermin and infestations prevalent among the urban trash heaps. He was even able to teach or to condition others for resources while still keeping his secrets of how to get what he needed. "I may be a poor anarchist, but I'm no gutter punk... some of them really are just raving loons and smelly bums," Millard was proud to say. "You give trash a new life and avoid adding more to landfills."

Not all his means were sensible.

Supermarkets and the hospitals were, ironically, not always his first choices (using trash compactors, they'd always use what they couldn't sell in their deli counters or they'd claim they'd provide it to soup kitchens and shelters), nor were restaurants (their standards were lax and often all he'd get was a mess of strange liquids and scraps).

There were plenty of opportunities with bakeries, smaller organic food stores, high class restaurants and catering warehouses, although, there, the pickings were guarded. He targeted higher-end grocery stores, where many of the items are organic and hormone-free, preferring to be a vegan, hence the freegan name that the hunter/gatherers of modern culture adopt for their social rebellion.

Millard just had to know when to get to his favorite spots. Sometimes daytime was more plentiful, yet nighttime was safer to avoid arrest or confrontations.
When hunger hits, there is a bounty of discovery
One night last week, Millard had a discovery, but it meant being actually inside the dumpster (usually he could just reach in to see what he could find). Boxes of bananas, all hermetically sealed, first got his attention, then even more finds, boxes of vitamin and herb bottles, all reaching their expiration date, a veritable archeological dig of foods.

He was shin-deep amid the waste with his Petzl Zipka strapped to his forehead, another snake light wrapped around his neck, using latex gloves for tearing open huge clear plastic garbage bags and rummaging through their contents for salvageables, anything to complete his food pyramid (a base of fruits and vegetables, then proteins and carbohydrates, and lastly, fats).

"Necessita los papeles legales para trabajar! Salga de esta cocina! Vaya!" he heard someone screaming as a door slammed in the financial district alleyway he'd just discovered. "He told me he had papers," he heard the voice say, as a flashlight scanned the brick walls around him.

A second voice mumbled something he couldn't hear, something official, some codes and numbers. Millard kept searching, trying to work quietly so he wouldn't be disturbed.

"What are you doing in there?" he heard the first voice say. Millard looked up, as he waded to the side, seeing two faces, one with an ICE badge flapping over the edge of the dumpster.

The two faces peered in on him, one with the badge having the standard governmental look, a white short-sleeved shirt with striped tie, ruddy complexion and clean-shaven face; the other peering in on Millard was a cook from the restaurant, a stout guy with a pencil-thin moustache in his chef whites and bandanna, the guy who'd just lost a Latino a job.

"I'm foraging, man, scavenging," Millard said sheepishly. "This bin's full of edibles."

The clear plastic bags of garbage throughout the dumpster showed there were discarded bread, salad greens, and a mish-mash of pasta and coffee grounds.

In Millard's jacket, two of the whole bread loaves jutted out of the inside pockets along with browning eggplants, sprouting yams, and basil with brown-edged leaves; outside the bin, he'd left the boxes of bananas. Poking out of his backpack was a plastic-wrapped mixed flower bouquet, and inside were two jars of olives, an open mesh sack of Yukon gold potatoes and another orange-string bag of tangerines, his prized finds.
Trash is private property
"Foraging, scavenging, trash thief, I don't care what you wanna call it... get outta there! It's private property," said the first voice, the cook. "Who you think you are, Robin Hood? I oughta have you arrested!"

The ICE guy rolled his eyes. It was time to go home, not deal with local police.

"I haven't made a mess," Millard said; that would've been against Millard's ethics. He knew to keep a bin tidy, either for the next person foraging or for the restaurant that had to clean up someone's mess (since they'd then lock up the bin to prevent such future scavenging and fouling up the streets); he always had his ways of keeping confrontations to a minimum, always staying respectful.

"Just leave what you found here," said the cook, giving Millard a derisive stare. He looked at the boxes of bananas.

"All I found here was the bananas. So you can have them."

"Those bread loaves are from us," the cook retorted.

"And they're stale. You're gonna use them?" Millard asked the cook, looking at the ICE official.

"No, they're not for sale, they're garbage now."

Millard looked at them both, saying, "so, you calling the cops?" The ICE official gave the cook another wrinkle to his brow. "I'm Millard," he said, "I'd shake hands, but, well, you know."

"No, I got work to do," said the chef, "just get outta here."

The ICE guy said, "I'm Randy. Go get some real food." He handed Millard $5 as he watched the cook walk back into his kitchen. "Generally, it’s not trespassing unless there are posted signs, but if you come up against any unfriendly cops, which I don't feel like hassling with tonight, you just end up in a legal jam, not worth anyone's time, the cops or anyone else's."

"You have a good night, and thanks," Millard said, relieved he wasn't having to talk his way out of jail. He knew of the Supreme Court ruling from 20 years ago; and he knew trash always belongs to someone, whether it's the dumpster's owner or the garbage companies who collect the trash.

"No," Randy said, "thank you, for a different kind of green." He walked out of the alley and turned in the opposite direction from which Millard had meant to go.

Millard had learned his lesson, of one more spot he wouldn't risk the trouble. He gave a last look at the bananas and knew he still had his bread, the olives, and the potatoes and tangerines.

In one of the most civilized places on the planet, Millard thought, there must be a better way to take out the garbage, that it's about death that's got nowhere else really to go.


08 November 2008

Segueing into the mundane phantasmagoria, from woodshed to watershed, we worry of the continuing indifference to indivisibility

Since we have been homeless, some events happened that didn't make much news. The Web and our grassroots coalition of friends helped us find the importance in our lives, sorting through the chaos and confusion.

Not everyone's in bliss about the U.S. 2008 general election. We're still stuttering through our Pledge of Allegiance's "indivisible-ble-ble, with liberty and justice for, um―"

Friday night's wild, drum-banging, whistle-blowing, trumpet-tooting crowd held huge banners and shouted "Equal rights now!" With "Yes we can!" chants, thousands blocked Market Street from Civic Center to the Castro, jamming traffic from the Embarcadero to the Mission. 8's disappointed volunteers used Facebook and craigslist and printed flyers to organize the event, instigating a significantly different reaction than the somber vigil Wednesday night following the election results.

Diminished in the outrage with 8's loss is one of another mandate, San Francisco's affordable housing measure, having failed: it would have set aside $30 million from the $6 billion budget to provide for relief for low- and middle-income residents who can't afford a home in San Francisco; opponents, primarily Mayor Gavin Newsom, had argued that the financial restrictions that come with the measure would force heavy cuts to city services. By contrast (or corollary), organizations like Habitat for Humanity San Francisco have made worthy efforts, yet the inadequacy of much of the private and public sectors continue to ignore the needs of the growing homeless population.

While we were gladdened by the election of our first black President, Barack Hussein Obama, we lost sight of some other insidious catastrophes.

While we've been worried about our homes, our jobs, our payrolls, our futures, what we've taken for granted are the freedoms and rights enabled by our Constitution, whose bigger picture's mess could make us more than sulk and worry:
  • frustrating and undermining complexity convincing the global masses of jeopardy to their sovereignty,
  • supporting of warrantless wiretaps and Web surveillance putting our identities at risk,
  • interventions and isolations for the republic with its centrist self-righteousness further constraining global trade,
  • spreading megalopolises with infrastructures barely maintaining nor sustaining for the quotidian mundaneity, insinuating their needs upon neighbors to uphold their insistence of disadvantage
  • burglarizing banks continuing their covert deregulation,
  • infiltrating telecommunications with pervasive telecineous control insisting their programming is of the highest standards,
  • key habeas corpus protections belying their certainty of their eminent domain's constituency,
  • due process hoaxes denying justice overburdening the already incapable and expansive prison state,
  • incorporating of socialism into the capitalist stratosphere while removing their encumbrance of debts, passing the consequent civil liability onto the taxpaying workforce,
  • subverting separation of powers,
  • protecting profit interests with tactics and strategies that are indelibly, almost irreconcilably, collapsing the fundamental core of how we have the means to survive.
What a people have established over 200 years, a guild (a cartel of oil/pharma) decimated in less than eight years.

Simply (without the previous list's periphrasis), we've been robbed, cheated and butchered, all in the name of big business whose ownership is a select few of the usual suspects.

We can hardly point our fingers at who's done the dirty deeds. Likely it would not do anyone any good. We know that there are Republicans for Obama who've said they want someone who will "reject the Karl Rove school of wedge politics and fundamentally change the way Washington works."
Catharsis is what America has needed
We must trust that such violations will not be part of the new regime. Obama's Website tells us to verify his concerns about such flagrant abuses and fears.

When Congress returns for the lame-duck session Nov. 17, Democrats are pushing a package of between $61 billion and $100 billion, which would be spent on infrastructure projects, an extension of jobless benefits, an increase in food stamps and aid to cash-strapped states. The Bush White House and Republicans in Congress are cool to the idea.

Whether it succeeds or fails, Democrats and Obama are planning, after he takes office in January, a stimulus plan that could be even bigger. Madame Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the details are still being debated, but she is pushing for a tax cut for the middle class.

I can hear the echoes throughout the nation, "It's about time!"

Such shamefulness as what's transpired in the last eight years is unacceptable in America, and we have always yearned to overcome such folly.

For many, Obama's seemingly swift success to President comes as a catharsis. He gives us hope that we did not know we'd nearly lost.

So now, we expect greatness from him, from the casual absorption of what we know of this Constitutional scholar, this teacher of legal history, this Senator, this true American luminary who's come from the virtual woodshed to an actual watershed of consolidating The American Dream, what we had only glimpsed as an imaginary Horatio Alger myth.

Yet we are in a hole.

Deep, with a steep escape.

We expect leaders to solve this mess.

By hastening the enactment of this tenuous change, we want our doubts to have meaning, and so we crave leadership.

Jobs are not emerging, any economic stimulus may be inadequate, industrial and technological progress continues to shrink despite venture capitalization efforts, and the dismal outlook for the recovery of banks or investments does not give us hope. Exxon Mobil and Genedata-Bayer Schering seem the only ones like a Fort Knox.

People feel they are in an age of disappointment.

And we desperately want to know how Obama emerged as a leader. His fingerprints are, after all, all over U.S. history.
What's happened to America is personal alienation
I must segue by discussing, when people ask me how I manage to keep abreast of news and the important information for sorting through the business of my life, how I still see the social overview beyond my grim purview. It's a discipline I inherited from Republican, military, governmental parents.

When I began to consider 35 years ago how we get our information and how media can manipulate society with insinuating the information they seem to need, how media have greater power over the dynamics of what we the people create and how the media's power-holders derive income from such creativity, I saw that it's a matter of accumulating my source data by experience of instinct, putting it on paper and sharing its wealth, then having it taken away except for its link to me by name. Politics gave me a clue for how media can work the systems, some of which is still in development and some hardly even a concept (the keys to the cyberpublishing palace aren't yet for the commonage).

Keeping control of creative work, much like staying in power politically, often means having funding, and yet it's also a matter of following the instinct of what keeps us in power, what gives us autonomy by depending on free and available access to outlets (airwaves in the 21st century are much like printing presses in the 20th century; we can share but we must reciprocate with our usage's fair trade agreement's terms: as any bar knows, at the end of the night, "you have to pay the band" ― the door's proceeds don't all go to the house, unless the band doesn't play, the equity of redemption any property owner knows, or learns).

What's interesting is how Obama's campaign singlehandedly destroyed the concept of public financing of major political contests using the media and grassroots networks to communicate and to rally support and to announce new agendas like his fair trade agreement considerations (especially with respect to data delivery). Such strategies will alter forever how we develop business information and social information, necessities for surviving in the world.

News enlightenment sites such as the Drudge Report and Huffington Post have gained significant influence since the last election.

The Drudge report in particular made mainstream media pay attention to a story by simply linking to it. Major news outlets didn't want to look foolish not covering a story that they know was seen on Drudge, for instance, by 30 million people.

Use of the Web to attract and organize volunteers by the Obama campaign was, arguably, the number one reason Obama won the election. He came in with the experience that organizing a community around political action is very important, and, in his campaign for President, he used the power of the Web to rally and organize effectively just like a town hall meeting. It was a brilliant strategy that was not matched by McCain in this election. McCain used what has been available without taking in the meme of hyper-communities, who are watching, listening, and acting on the word spread by accessing the Web. The Web is a dynamic few still grasp. Its sorting already manipulates the access by its means of commodifying creativity, since systems manage the thinking of predicting automatically; the only human element is the creativity, the most valuable commodity.
America's future is changing, we trust, at least we have a hint
We know that more people voted, percentage-wise, in this election than have voted in 50 years (since JFK), nearly 70% of eligible voters. And, according to Wired.com, myBarackObama.com chalked up some 1.5 million volunteer accounts. Combining this organizational ability with Web fundraising dramatically altered how campaigns will happen in the future.

Mainstream news Websites such as CNN.com, MSNBC.com and FOXNews.com overtook their television counterparts as the place people get their news.

Web entities such as TechCrunch provided data access facts and statistics in order for mainstream media to coordinate their audience share and the manner of its usage.

Video clips, as we know, have become mainstream, both as a way to illustrate political points and to view clips of the candidates from news and entertainment television shows (what we missed on television, we see on the Web). For instance, a clip of Sarah Palin's appearance on Saturday Night Live had viewings of 7,264,478 times on YouTube. A politically inspired clip of Barack Obamba's discussions on a radio show (of his desire to "spread the wealth") had viewers on YouTube 2,393,392 times. Nowhere near the numbers actually viewed the broadcast. This in particular has changed political marketing forever.

Political news watched with Web video clips clearly has become mainstream. News often isn't TiVo’d, but it apparently has huge views on news Websites and on YouTube.

Partisan political blogs like PowerLineBlog.com and DailyKos.com have become even more important. Yes, political blogs made CBS and Dan Rather look silly in the last election; with this election, they have become legitimate voices of political opinion.

The 2008 election solidified the political blogger as an authority voice in politics. Some of them, such as John H. Hinderaker of Power Line and Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos, regularily appear on network and cable news shows.

Niche non-partisan political sites, such as RealClearPolitics.com and Politico.com, have become mainstream. The RealClearPolitics.com poll average map in particular was routinely source-referenced by the major television networks and news Websites. This changed how news organizations report on poll data, making people wiser with variations in polls. Outlying poll results were consequently not given as much credence as in the past.
People crave more community (knowing faces and names helps)
Social media hardly existed four years ago; during this election the candidates and their supporters used sites such as Twitter, Facebook and MySpace aggressively, convincing people to knock on their virtual neighbor's door, and leaving them a virtual doorhanger note as an opportunity to add themselves to a network's site ("thanks for the add!" being a common salute). This strategy will continue to evolve over the next four years to possibly become one of the most powerful weapons a candidate has in their quest for organizing, rallying, raising funds, and ultimately winning the key positions of power, such as the Presidency.

If social media had filters for the truth, there would be no misjudging who's accessing the network. Unless we have power within the network system, while eventually being granted our connection to the access, we will continue to be unable to protect our communication and, most importantly, our sources for data of vital information, in order to disseminate criteria for decisions and planning; that's a critical "unless" we must face. We want people to know our identity without harming us.

As with any media, whoever owns the connection to our access, whether it's buying a newspaper from the rack or the corner dealer, or if it's the Web and we decide who we want to get our resources of communications along with specific selective data, whether through a conglomerate or an open source entity (there is currently no organization providing fair and open source access to news resources), then we will continue to have diminishing value with what we create and what we provide to the public, whether it's those with access to our site or those subsequently fed information from our site (RSS output, essentially; the resource then being cut off or conveyed through means by which we cannot track its content and its manipulation).

It is up to gatherers to decide who gets the source data; it should inevitably be up to the initial creator or producer to decide how the content or data is out in the universe. The rack is empty, so we go to the one down the street or to the one the Web feeds provide.

For now, entities such as Google, Yahoo and Microsoft monopolize the feeds. Traditional media has no control. We have limited means through them to feed without limiting our own content's true sources. Giving up our sources is the catch.

With any creative outlet, agents and producers hold the control, unless the creative source keeps their output guarded by working the channeling. Because we don't oown those filters, those algorithmic devices or containers that predict then allow accessibility.

Channels will be the next diversion, wifi and optimization enterprises providing the means.

Music and storytelling will see the dynamic first, due to their ease of pervasive impact, of knowing what everyone wants.

Performance and video will be next, then food, then travel, then other dimensional diversions. Sex, gambling and intoxication outlets will be the obvious criteria to how the social and business games play.

How the legal ramifications get settled will be under the auspices of the audacity of the new social standards.
We're beginning to see the map for Obama's Presidency
All the new social standards will have governmental intrusions too, to some extent. We know from the business concerns. Obama's concerned about the economy enough to tell the media and the public some of the directions of his bigger plans. He knows what he's learned form his campaign's financing, for instance, what Wall Street could learn from non-profits, and what we've derived from the Web's capability of funding and all that cultural milieu.

In his first meeting with the media after his victory, Obama told the media who'd be in charge of helping him in his administration. He chose Rahm Emanuel, as the new White House Chief of Staff, a close ally to balance Obama's conciliatory demeanor. With Emanuel's experience in politics of no mere 50mm caliber, especially with critical domestic policies (he helped in Congress to engineer the details built into the $700 billion bailout, due to his experience within the financial sector) and as a foreign policy instigator (with his former Israel Defense Forces service indicating his pro-Zionist stance), Emanuel will likely continue to be the brusque and volatile negotiator he has been since his face became known during the Clinton era.

Obama's other staff could include chief transition strategist David Axelrod, as well as Susan Rice, Lawrence Summers, John Podesta, and others. These are people who will challenge the President yet will lead the country in a direction to hold to what we've expected of what will be the Obama values.

Obama knows his Constitution and he depends on key people to represent such interests so he can keep his promises. We can't expect his promises to be timely, since he's told us he'll always keep us informed (in the loop).

The Congressional committee that puts together the inauguration ceremonies announced that the theme would be “A New Birth of Freedom,” to mark the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, symbolically linking one president from Illinois who freed the slaves to another who broke the ultimate racial barrier in politics.

Obama and Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. will receive briefings Thursday from Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, and thereafter each morning by a pair of Central Intelligence Agency officials. Beyond choosing staff members, Obama must decide how active he intends to be in asserting leadership during the transition.

He has conferred with Congressional leaders about passing a $100 billion economic stimulus package in a lame-duck session (before Thanksgiving) to pay for public works projects, aid to cities and states, and unemployment, food stamp and heating benefits. Congressional aides said that if Obama could not win agreement from Bush and Senate Republicans, they might scale the package back to about $60 billion, then come back in January with a broader plan.

Let's hope that we can expect more than just the news of a new puppy in the White House.

Let's hope that we see rights for affordable homes.


06 November 2008

8's ban vows, "No you can't! You can't love, you can't be, you just can't!"

We teach our children that they cannot love.

On the steps and streets around San Francisco's City Hall, people gathered, a day after the 2008 general election, assembling at the Lincoln statue (a 1927 monument to the republic for The City), a copper cast institution, which became a beacon for expressing rights to love.

One by one, people came, some alone, some hand in hand, and they lit candles.

One flame to another, believing, catching fire, the flames expressed love.

Brothers, sisters. LGBTI. Police officers, firefighters, construction workers, teens in tie-dyed uniforms, homeless with all their world belongings, AIDS patients in wheelchairs, college youth on bikes, skateboarders, goths, Latinos, Arabs, African-Americans, Asians, Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, veterans, ministers, clergy, parents, children.

The vigil began to form at twilight, and grew to thousands in the evening, as word spread of passage of Proposition 8's ban on marriage, same-sex marriage, yet marriage nevertheless between two people who love.

With all precincts in the state counted, Proposition 8 was leading by a 52.5% to 47.5% margin. Opponents held out hope that they could overcome a 400,000 vote deficit when provisional and absentee ballot were counted. Amid the euphoria around Obama's tremendous victory, gay men and women across San Francisco found it difficult to contain their disappointment, anger, and grief.

"Discrimination is wrong, on any level," one young woman spoke to the news cameras, her face flushed, dressed in sweats of flamboyant pink and lime-green and bright yellow. She wiped at her cheeks and looked at her girlfriend by her side for comfort, with the obvious tears from hours of crying giving her consternation as to continuing. "This isn't me protesting about bigotry or homophobia or misandry or misogyny, and I'm way too young to know about, to've ever even lived with, miscegenation. I'm here tonight to grieve. I believe in this country, and I thought it was on its way. I was wrong. Over in the Castro today, flags are half-mast, for a damn good reason." She looked again at her companion for some sanction for her language. Her friend smiled, approvingly.

People carried around rainbow flags and USA flags. Emotions were overwhelming, expressing regret and dismay in the light of hope that served as a reason for many to vote. They came to gather at City Hall, for their grief, and to express love.

Love to complete strangers, love to themselves, love of life.

The vigil's silence and love gave light to the air like a star's fire.

As the statue of Lincoln accumulated candles, we took pictures. Our emotions made us speechless. We could hardly focus, our eyes would not let us see, and we had to blink, to let the tears go. Our voices broke. Our bodies shook with almost violent sobs. Numbers grew (as the numbers have grown, to over 18,000 who've married in California since the institution of same-sex marriage in San Francisco in 2006); the assembled had a genuinely palpable outrage to contain.

Yet there was peace. And reason. Somehow, probably because of love.

Parents brought their children, who rode on their mommy's or daddy's shoulders looking out over the thousands of faces and bodies, everyone holding candles. And the children asked, quite innocently, after their parents tried to explain, and the children asked again and again and again, wondering why they could not get a simple, straight answer, "Why can't those people marry? Why can't people love each other? Doesn't the church teach us to love?"

"It's against the law now," mommies and daddies said.

What else could they say? Were they supposed to teach them the roots of the word, vote, "vow," as so many words that they'd forget if they didn't know their meaning?
What "no you can't!" teaches children
A human child can do almost anything he or she wants. We fly; a telescope takes pictures of the universe.

So why do we teach our children that they cannot love?

Carbon to spark to fire to light, one flame to another wick, a microcosm became a polycosm, each tiniest bit of fire, chemistry expressing a form of celestial love, the candles multiplied.

We had voted as a community, as a state, as a union. We have observed the process of our votes. We have a mandate, a choice, a voice from the people, and we have a ban, against two people who love, to marry.

Denied.

Betrayed.

Changed.

Yes we've long understood and agreed that a majority rules. Even when a proposition or candidate is wrong, the vote counts.

What did W teach us?

Besides fear and hatred and killing, and losing our jobs, our homes, our children? Besides that, what did we learn over the last eight years?

W taught us about votes and justices, that they matter by any twist of law, by any twist of imagination, by any twist of fate.

What did President-elect Obama teach us?

Obama's taught us, yes we can, together, yes we can, we can make a difference.
What laws teach us
So, 8 had lost, and its defeat brought hundreds, thousands to the streets. Beckoning. To San Francisco City Hall. To hold a wake. Hope could bring that kind of community of understanding together to protest what matters: law, imagination, fate.

Some people just months ago hardly knew what Proposition 8 was, what it meant, what it could do; for many people, until this last two weeks, it was one of many choices, which barely mattered, since it wouldn't affect them.

Out of 10 million who'd voted in California, 5 million people across California opposed Proposition 8's ban (incidentally, about the same percentages that supported the nationwide Republican agenda). For traffic passing City Hall, some, last night, wondering what their not voting meant, they observed the assembled with bewilderment, unaware of their being complacent, apathetic, indifferent, numb.

"As long as they don't impose their lifestyles on me and my kids," one driver indignantly mumbled loudly to me as I crossed at a traffic light, walking away from Civic Center (I recalled that Focus on the Family and other religious conservative groups contributed to the campaign's $75 million in spending).

So, 8 does not explicitly state that a retroactive overturn or nullification could happen, that all marriages would be revoked. Its language, "only opposite-sex marriage can be recognized in California," indicates, though, that it was meant to deny recognition to all same-sex marriages, including those that were legal before the election.

Such opprobrium generates a reproach of disgrace. People defy laws every day. We learn about law. That's what we teach our children. We teach them the consequences, the reasons for laws.

Our understanding of government, our sense of its practice, its necessity, its ultimacy, its existence depends on reason and love.

Many of us were remembering Harvey Milk and Mayor George Moscone, the evening after they were murdered, and their spirits were telling us last night to keep our emotions calm, to protest, and to love.

Our lives are at stake here. Not just our jobs. Not just our homes. Not just our votes. Those are things we know how to lose. Our lives and our children's lives, that's what we lose.

So, this is what we teach our children: "you can't have love―not that kind of of love, anyhow―it's been agreed."

As the crowds left City Hall and the statue of Lincoln, with the candles remaining, burning with hope, the voices rose in unity as the assembled marched, chanting "Marriage! Equality! USA!"

They thought about law, and imagined, and prayed.

And children watched with the eyes of God.


05 November 2008

Yes we can change our small part in the world

With W's transition speech broadcast this morning after a momentous, historic election, I had an important realization (maybe just for me, and likely it's not the most respectful conclusion in some people's hearts, since some people don't even begin to ascertain the betrayal and misprision that's been, for people like me, an unworldly burden to bear). I almost cried.

Simply, I realized, I finally have someone I can respectfully call President. Because, for me, W wasn't.

Let me tell you, as an intelligent American citizen who's voted, not just someone who happens to know homelessness, how this is likely worthy of your attention, if you haven't had the same conclusion too.

Hope. United. American Dream.

After grief, after suffering, after despair, after dismay, after loss after loss after loss.

"It's like a combination of the day after Christmas and post-coital orgasm and giving birth," as one of the media, columnist Mark Morford, voiced the near inexpressible.

It is inspiring and yet it is a sentiment which has its limits.
Consider that hope takes work
The work of hope's scope was in the message that Senator Barack Obama gave in his speech to his supporters last night.


If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.
It’s the answer told by lines that stretched around schools and churches in numbers this nation has never seen; by people who waited three hours and four hours, many for the very first time in their lives, because they believed that this time must be different; that their voice could be that difference.
I was never the likeliest candidate for this office. We didn’t start with much money or many endorsements. Our campaign was not hatched in the halls of Washington – it began in the backyards of Des Moines and the living rooms of Concord and the front porches of Charleston.
It was built by working men and women who dug into what little savings they had to give five dollars and ten dollars and twenty dollars to this cause. It grew strength from the young people who rejected the myth of their generation’s apathy; who left their homes and their families for jobs that offered little pay and less sleep; from the not-so-young people who braved the bitter cold and scorching heat to knock on the doors of perfect strangers; from the millions of Americans who volunteered, and organized, and proved that more than two centuries later, a government of the people, by the people and for the people has not perished from this Earth. This is your victory.
I know you didn’t do this just to win an election and I know you didn’t do it for me. You did it because you understand the enormity of the task that lies ahead. For even as we celebrate tonight, we know the challenges that tomorrow will bring are the greatest of our lifetime – two wars, a planet in peril, the worst financial crisis in a century. Even as we stand here tonight, we know there are brave Americans waking up in the deserts of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan to risk their lives for us. There are mothers and fathers who will lie awake after their children fall asleep and wonder how they’ll make the mortgage, or pay their doctor’s bills, or save enough for college. There is new energy to harness and new jobs to be created; new schools to build and threats to meet and alliances to repair.
The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep. We may not get there in one year or even one term, but America – I have never been more hopeful than I am tonight that we will get there. I promise you – we as a people will get there.
There will be setbacks and false starts. There are many who won’t agree with every decision or policy I make as President, and we know that government can’t solve every problem. But I will always be honest with you about the challenges we face. I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. And above all, I will ask you join in the work of remaking this nation the only way it’s been done in America for two-hundred and twenty-one years – block by block, brick by brick, calloused hand by calloused hand.
What began twenty-one months ago in the depths of winter must not end on this autumn night. This victory alone is not the change we seek – it is only the chance for us to make that change. And that cannot happen if we go back to the way things were. It cannot happen without you.
So let us summon a new spirit of patriotism; of service and responsibility where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look after not only ourselves, but each other. Let us remember that if this financial crisis taught us anything, it’s that we cannot have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers – in this country, we rise or fall as one nation; as one people.
Let us resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long. Let us remember that it was a man from this state who first carried the banner of the Republican Party to the White House – a party founded on the values of self-reliance, individual liberty, and national unity. Those are values we all share, and while the Democratic Party has won a great victory tonight, we do so with a measure of humility and determination to heal the divides that have held back our progress. As Lincoln said to a nation far more divided than ours, “We are not enemies, but friends…though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection.” And to those Americans whose support I have yet to earn – I may not have won your vote, but I hear your voices, I need your help, and I will be your President too.
And to all those from beyond our shores, from parliaments and palaces to those who are huddled around radios in the forgotten corners of our world – our stories are singular, but our destiny is shared, and a new dawn of American leadership is at hand. To those who would tear this world down – we will defeat you. To those who seek peace and security – we support you.
And to all those who have wondered if America’s beacon still burns as bright – tonight we proved once more that the true strength of our nation comes not from our the might of our arms or the scale of our wealth, but from the enduring power of our ideals: democracy, liberty, opportunity, and unyielding hope.
For that is the true genius of America – that America can change. Our union can be perfected. And what we have already achieved gives us hope for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.
This election had many firsts and many stories that will be told for generations. But one that’s on my mind tonight is about a woman who cast her ballot in Atlanta. She’s a lot like the millions of others who stood in line to make their voice heard in this election except for one thing – Ann Nixon Cooper is 106 years old.
She was born just a generation past slavery; a time when there were no cars on the road or planes in the sky; when someone like her couldn’t vote for two reasons – because she was a woman and because of the colour of her skin.
I think about all that she’s seen throughout her century in America – the heartache and the hope; the struggle and the progress; the times we were told that we can’t, and the people who pressed on with that American creed: Yes we can.
At a time when women’s voices were silenced and their hopes dismissed, she lived to see them stand up and speak out and reach for the ballot. Yes we can.
When there was despair in the dust bowl and depression across the land, she saw a nation conquer fear itself with a New Deal, new jobs and a new sense of common purpose. Yes we can.
When the bombs fell on our harbour and tyranny threatened the world, she was there to witness a generation rise to greatness and a democracy was saved. Yes we can.
She was there for the buses in Montgomery, the hoses in Birmingham, a bridge in Selma, and a preacher from Atlanta who told a people that “We Shall Overcome.” Yes we can.
A man touched down on the moon, a wall came down in Berlin, a world was connected by our own science and imagination. And this year, in this election, she touched her finger to a screen, and cast her vote, because after 106 years in America, through the best of times and the darkest of hours, she knows how America can change. Yes we can.
America, we have come so far. We have seen so much. But there is so much more to do. So tonight, let us ask ourselves – if our children should live to see the next century; if my daughters should be so lucky to live as long as Ann Nixon Cooper, what change will they see? What progress will we have made?
This is our chance to answer that call. This is our moment. This is our time – to put our people back to work and open doors of opportunity for our kids; to restore prosperity and promote the cause of peace; to reclaim the American Dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth – that out of many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope, and where we are met with cynicism, and doubt, and those who tell us that we can’t, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people:
Yes We Can. Thank you, God bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

― from U.S. President-elect Barack Obama's Victory Speech
(full text available, elsewhere, with important part about a puppy for his daughters, Sasha and Malia)

Consider that there's the business of obituaries
If you've ever considered how the media prepares for their work, in order to be ready for filling the pages or the airtime with substance, you know there are dependencies, contingencies, reliabilities, readiness, decisions, plans, a final ability to provide truth.

They must be prepared, of course, to keep people's interest, especially because of their sponsors.

They must be prepared, of course, to have facts straight and reliable, especially because of their competition, and so they don't waste resources and energy correcting or covering up the truth.

They must be prepared, of course, to trust what they provide, especially because of their integrity or dignity or a sense of ongoing purpose.

Consider obituaries.

Someone's dead, either suddenly or unexpectedly: the media has its stock, footage or galleys, the bulk of stories ready for publication or for broadcast, so that some of the shock of the news has history upon which to rest and to recover and to rely. Grief requires its transitions, and even the business of media knows what to do.

(Sometimes no writers can type that fast.)

I can remember JFK's assassination, as a child.

I can remember Martin Luther King as an adolescent.

I can remember 9/11.

For neither tragedy were we prepared. The media used pictures to break the stun, since words were unutterable.

So it is with this morning's news that we have a certain acceptance of shock.

We have leadership on which we can rely. It is not time to run through the streets giddy with some masturbatory satisfaction or a time to carve up some battle plan to bring back the dead. It is time to be circumspect.

Anyone knows that the compelling essence of any story is conflict.

Conflict is life. Conflict is what we expect. Conflict is what makes us human, with the ability to reason.

Conflict makes reason happen. For the media, its expectability is what "sells papers," as they say.
Consider that there're differences that won't change overnight
With the results of yesterday's election, we will not be rid of the cigar-smoked backrooms where deals get made that change people's lives, irreconcilably, we will not be rid of the protectiveness of binding agreements that ensure the equity of the rich and powerful, and we will not be rid of brokenness that we inherit from bad leadership.

We will not be rid of the Bible-thumping rednecks ("ain't goan be no Easta egg hunt this yeuh, dey's goan be cotton pickin' at de blackhouse") or the military surprise xenophobic demons ("don't ask me now I don't give a damn I got o-bombin' to do") or the idiot bigot psychopaths who want to get their jollies and become famous by taking out the President (it won't happen; if anyone knows how difficult it is to get to W, past all the Secret Service and Homeland Security, they'd put their jack sparrow back in the bottle, their Kalashnikov and M16 arsenal back under their bed with all their dirty magazines, and go find a plank to jump off for the next election).

As I walked past City Hall last night near closing time for the polls, Cindy Sheehan and her troops were out on the steps, taking pictures. Her blanketed shivering Chihuahua, Pete, in tow, and her campaign manager, Tiffany, with the digital cam, and her adoring workers, carrying signs, and banners and a flower-braided peace sign, they framed themselves for posterity, only to be told by a sheriff that they'd have to remove themselves from the steps. So they were then off in the campaign wagon, the 14-foot travelling home Cindy calls Jezebel.

Cindy would eventually face, later that evening, loss to Madame Speaker Pelosi, during a campaign some called a "fool's errand," yet with pride in having helped voice causes nagging Pelosi's constituency, and without the actual chance of confrontation or forum for debating the incumbent; nothing's squandered.

"If we never level the playing field to allow the people's voice and message to be heard, the tyranny of incumbency and the obscene amount of money spent on these circuses will continue and true progressive change will never happen," Cindy proclaimed today. "On November 5th, we still have millions of people sleeping on our streets and without jobs and health care. We still have our troops mired in two unconscionable wars that Obama has not promised to end. Our economy is still on a very precarious footing and oil, the lifeblood of the elite, is running out. There are many people in this world, and yes, even in this nation, whose food is insecure and whose next resource wars may be over water."

Yes, there is damage to undo, some that we can't undo, and some still in the wind, some hard-edged, sweat-busting, gnarly-ass truth, which means work.

Yet a googlillion words and a gazillion pictures could not have clearer expression for the hope that still sustains us.
Consider that the American Dream is no longer an obituary
As I walked the streets of Russian Hill and Nob Hill and the Tenderloin and Civic Center this morning, I could not ignore the thousands of pieces of campaign litter collecting in gutters and sidewalks and entryways, all the doorhangers, signs, stickers, buttons, ballot receipts.

Winners, losers. Some names you won't be able to find with a compass in four years, all the ones who were bat shit crazy and who'll die by then in nut houses, put there from believing in all their Pentecostal juju and from seeing if they'd win by consulting Ouija boards.

Like the people of Brazil, with their popular president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a former shoe shiner and union leader, we know someone can have global dreams, as we have the American Dream, and give up on the nightmare we've had for what seems forever.

We're not twisting in the wind any longer trying to figure out where all the bodies from Guantanamo get buried, who's paying for the trillion dollar corporate rescue, what to make of the Congo genocide, whether it'll be a pit-bull-with-lipstick-with-a-plumber ticket in 2012, or when the missiles aimed by Russia will deploy on our New World Order. All that's still haunting us. And we still have to face facts.

While some may be stockpiling, and others will be moping, and still others may be gloating, not much has changed that money didn't buy, even hope. There is still work to do and children to consider and a union to keep. At least we're not having to be reading obituaries.

As Desmond Tutu reflected on Obama's victory, speaking of new beginnings with change for the U.S., "the sky's the limit."

We know we still have secondary citizens in America. The dimensions of society here have undeniable limits to overcome.

For now, we have a new definition of "New World Order."

Rosa Parks sat, so Martin Luther King Jr. could walk.

Dr. King walked, so Barack Obama could run.

President Barack Obama ran, so we and our children could fly.


04 November 2008

Deblogatory "We," the apologetic, aloof, elusive, disenchanted, defiant, among you people

We cannot get some rights out of our sights (some of us are reaching when we're looking at the stars).

On an historic day in United States history, finding harmony in juxtaposition, articulating purpose with the common good, preparing to meet challenges of the homeless, all means of coping and making freedoms that are hard-fought entitlements, as what our U.S. Constitution frames, into a way to have our dreams, without taking dreams away from others around us, a pinch awakens us: clowns, acrobats and a white tiger float away in the moment's phantasmagoria.

We have a perception, often, as homeless, of being manipulative, of feeling ephemerally vulnerable, of acting incidentally incapable, of having a homeless person inside us with a dismissive face that we neglect, that we ignore, that we reject from our small world.

Something tells us we need a different view. What the presidential election means for many of us is a way to look at a new culture emerging. With global outlooks, diversity and youth showing a difference in knowing how to vote―aside from the popular mania behind the presidential issue, an important driving issue, granted, for everyone―the parallax view shows significantly unmanageable dynamics with how the American culture survives with all its encumbrance―debt, dishonor, disdain.

We don't want those damp shoes in the rain.

Outside City Hall, the local campaigners urged passersby to vote, as the lines for early voters, the day before the general election, had meant up to an hour's wait. Not many left, most were patient, with the strongest determination giving them incentive being voting in the most important election in their lifetimes. "This presidential race has seemingly been going on for an eternity. But it's been the most captivating race I have seen in my lifetime," one aged gentleman said (he had been out on Polk and Grove, in the rain, urging people, "vote for Cindy after you've voted for Obama!"). Today, the day of the election, he stood out again to the public supporting him and encouraging his enthusiasm. "Likely the most important election the U.S. has ever seen!" he continued, barely speaking to one person before another showed, needing his enthusiasm. Rain did not dampen spirits nor intentions (although you don't need a web link to know which way the weather was going).

We don't want that inimical half-smiling mask in a crowd.

As breaking news provided the loss of Barack Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, who was 86, campaigning continued. "She's gone home," Obama said at the University of North Carolina in Charlotte during his campaigning Monday, as the crowds grew silent in an evening drizzle. Obama said he wanted people to know she was one of the "quiet heroes that we have all across America" working hard and hoping to see their children and grandchildren thrive. "That's what we're fighting for," Obama said. Her battle with cancer was valiant yet it was hoped that she would see Obama's victory. Much of who Obama is comes from his grandmother. "From my grandmother, I get my pragmatism, my levelheadedness, my ability to stay centered in the eye of the story," Obama told the assembled media. "My sensible, no-nonsense side is what I inherited from her." (We remember his words of the 2004 Democratic convention: "We are one people, pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America. With the audacity of hope! In the end that is God's greatest gift to us, the bedrock of this nation. A belief in things not seen. A belief that there are better days ahead.") McCain offered condolences.

We don't want that scruffy uniform near us.

People continue to hope for jobs, while all we get is prisons; even the automakers are scared they won't get help with a bailout like what the banks got, while technology tries to get back to business without being saddled with the self-serving free market ideology compromises that have jeopardized the work force and America's place in the world.

We keep our distance, pretending that that weight predicament, that baldness, that scar, that emptiness, could never happen to us, and that that's not what we see in the mirror.

The same old story line seems to get out of hand.

We let a deception walk down the street with us, redirecting our focus, making inept excuses, changing our pace, without discretion, disenchanted with our small world.

Food is a growing concern as food banks, soup kitchens and non-profits tighten their belts.

We say our windows are clean enough.

Do we really care if W has made peace with his low approval? A different form of urgency beckons, giving the finger.

We say our Teutonic newspaper is elsewhere, and we've already read that one.

Considering all the things we need to know to survive, it's a wonder how we ever do.

We say our spare change is not on us, an invisible coin, out of reach, in our pocket's intimacy of shame.

Do you know where your mind and your genitals have been the entire time you read this blog? Your train may be running late.

We have someplace else to be, that's why we're hurrying, that's the urgency, that's why we can deny just for now the ignoring face, mirroring someone we don't want to know.

In a makeshift camp near a freeway onramp, police found five people shot dead; if the same media reports providing the news say, "police believe the five were homeless," and then say "investigations continue," what are we to conclude? That we knew they were homeless and we'll never know the cause of their death, since there are more important investigations to pursue?

We try to say to ourselves in dismay that our mindstream is in a vehicle on its own course.

Everyone wants a better future without giving up the best of what we have; even a legendary rebel like Neil Young has a plan for turning his old '59 Lincoln from "a hog into a swan."

We don't have a need for water out of that faucet, we claim.

In other parts of the country (Texas), they worry about axolotl (the Mexican walking fish), a key to Aztec mythology and diet, which has survived the polluted canals of Lake Xochimimilco, is now nearly extinct, scientists claim, and could even destabilize the economy. It's amazing what The Great American Dollar funds elsewhere.

We don't ever use that operating system, we assert.

Geeks insist they're voters; it's just they're not very social.

We haven't ever learned manual shifting, we admit.

Red, blue, green, no one likes to be reflecting the state of the aggregate mind. Even if one's supposed to be called "Madame." There are alternatives a heart beat away from the virtual leader of the free world, who'd attest that they've been in the driver's seat long enough to know where the road goes.

We can't become the assimilationist, anonymizing our sense of brotherhood as if it's beyond our sense of family when we can barely know our neighbor's names.

Whitewashing human rights is what the neocons prefer with castigating their opposition, as they condemn anyone's contingent aggressions towards their rights (even to say "fuck" while speaking another language).

We're destitute for lack of friends, yet we're unwilling to identify with refuting to a complicity in the public persona we deny (prejudice in any form is still prejudice).

Sunday saw the Mission celebration, Dia De Los Muertos, a day's commemoration of the dead and a transformation for autumnal equinox's jubilation (it's a living, and it's a dying). Homeless groups carried a coffin on a parade of bicycles for the forgotten homeless in all of us.

We don't come out of our shells, our skeletons, our spells.

Protecting the problems isn't considering the problems. Easy as it is to speak a good tweak and stride a good ride, a misconception of greenhouse is how it's a consequence of negligence by the big bad corporations, not the corps of auto-drivers and dry-cleaners and paint-removers and sign-makers (among others), those of us who forget the damage we do to the atmosphere, the water table, the earth.

We don't eat suet yet our spirit is starving for blood pudding.

The ruling elite bargain with a paradox, as Thomas Dye's "Who's Running America" describes with the choice of sacrificing for collaboration or collaborating for a sacrifice.

We don't touch weapons or shy from badges.

With yoga, the body gets through its separation, the source of depression, resentment and deep grief, to integrate a ground, a sense, a breath of freshness, a resurgence. Astounding how the body's rejuvenation makes the thoughts and emotions balance.

We self-promote our wretched lives, while twisting balloons to admonish the crying child's sheer horror of us, while skitching into a 360-rail grind of melon-grab ollies to bolster our vigor, while chanting our booming defculture to contain our uppitiness, while cursing the parking meter fairies to protest stealing time, while decrying the helicopter searchlights in the arroyos to flip off what we can see: contemplating our presence in our small world.

I'm reading a Joseph Conrad novel, "Victory," a classic story set on an island in the Malay Archipelago, a terrifying departure for Conrad, having always been an exile (except on his famous sea voyages). The basis of conflict and core of "Victory" entails his "one of us" parallels for the writer to an unknown audience, in that we are always overcoming a "Narcissus" adversity, in that we are often barely able to resurrect hope out of the "heart of darkness," in that we are like the principal characters, Heyst and Lena, always moving to symbolize the power of rectitude and the power of love. "Victory" has had a tradition of tributes―five film versions, Bob Dylan's song, "Black Diamond Bay" (a port in the novel), and countless writers discussing the elitist exclusivity of all that the novel keeps out, which is usually the primary function of a novel, keeping in what it needs to put out. In my spare time, I read it to fuel my imagination to what I need to put in, what I need to keep out, of my striving to get out of the homelessness predicament, or as Ralph Waldo Emerson said "to enjoy an original relation to the universe," in the innermost frontier of solitude, remembering what I have of history to constitute a future, thinking of all of us.


01 November 2008

Watching my mannerliness: "MILK," marriage, mau-mauing, and motherly meanders

In a fractal still point of chaotic confusion, my mind took in the winds building in parabolas at Civic Center Plaza yesterday afternoon, while a wedding took place.

I was recalling that, this week, San Francisco has been aglow with the Castro's premiere of "MILK," a film by Gus Van Sant starring Sean Penn, about the legendary gay activist, Harvey Milk (1930-1978).

The screening event was a benefit for several groups―among them homeless and gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender youth (proceeds will benefit the Hetrick-Martin Institute, home of Harvey Milk High School, in New York City, Larkin Street Youth Services, here in San Francisco, The Point Foundation, the national scholarship-granting organization, and San Francisco’s LGBT Community Center). A huge spectacle of protesters opposing Propositon 8 had greeted the attendants of the screening.

With the fight for civil rights still continuing, "Harvey would be angry," said Cleve Jones, gay rights activist, played in the film by Emile Hirsch, "and he'd still be fighting."
Celebrations of life ally good causes
Victory Garden―with its now browning stalks of sunflowers, its curling yet still fragrant basil and its flowering going-to-seed red chard, remnant of the Slow Food movement's gift to City Hall Plaza―got its first rain yesterday (since September, it is homage to the myth of California's golden past and its awakened modernity, which some say that "it's about a revolution," it's really about "a celebration of rethinking").

Hay bales (chicken-wired to fence off, not the pigeons, starlings and seagulls but the homeless riff-raff) served as the wedding ceremony's wayward reception, its seating, a surety of attachment to the earth, of faith in a celebration, of matrimony, of bond to seeds and fruit, of union. I'd stopped to look at the garden with my foot up on one of the bales, tying my shoe, while waiting for a friend.

These two guys who'd just been married turned to ask me if I'd take their picture. "I'm Holden, as in beholdin', and this is Phoebe, like the Greek goddess, but pronounced feeb," Holden said.

"Or dweeb," Phoebe joked, "'cause I'm anything if not feeble, really more of a dweeb, since I love good writing."

I smiled and took the camera, examining it, looking at them officiously, yet mannerly, while ensuring I knew how it worked. "There's the zoom," I said, "okay, good, there's the focus."

In their nuptial plumage, Holden in white dreadlocked braids and adornments of Buddhist medallions over a black satin tux and Phoebe in a simple white tux with beads of agates, turquoise and amber, they were resplendent under the grey skies.

Then Holden and Phoebe kissed.

I felt like I was eavesdropping, a digital camera's capturing of intimacy's fulfillment. It's good I'd figured out the focus.

In the background, two Latinos in cowboy hats did a ho-di-do jig and a group of Asians practiced Falun Gong, a yo quiero twang gospel Buddhist souvenir of blessedness to spread the sacred bliss. I was a passerby into a new American tradition, and welcomed into a precious, yet anonymous, perfectly righteous way to celebrate life.

Hallelujah!

I thought to have asked about their names, just before I left, confirming, since I knew I'd heard, and I'd wondered if I'd heard right, or if they'd made up their names (J.D. Salinger's "Catcher in the Rye" has the characters, of course, Holden Caulfield, and his sister, Phoebe―pronounced fee-bee, exactly like the goddess); a lyric came suddenly to mind, "above us only sky," I walked off into my day, and the sun came out after the brief rain showers.

My friend, Sonny, had showed and we were off to Critical Mass.
Remembering everyone's not having a good day
While I was in my meanwhile of peace, love and understanding, reality had reared its ugly decapitated head with torture, sabotage and coercion, targeting dissent on Black Panthers. Arrested this last week were Sonny's friends―"just call them associates, or acquaintances," he'd said, squinting and looking at me squarely.

The San Francisco Eight are the quintessence of a people having done nothing more than raise their voices for the corruption and vulnerable harassment of some poor and disenfranchised, those who were unable to stand up for their rights. "For you people," Sonny was understandably upset, telling me the story, the background, filling me in on "the pieces that didn't make the papers." What he knew, so far.

"Sorry," he said, "I'll never be able to rub off the color," as I thought to myself, I've been able to unearth much of my passed down embedded racism, the ugliness that sprouts in my thoughts out of nowhere, catches me by surprise―"so wait, dey's a nigga goan be in da white house? praise de load! pass 'em me some mo' dat coanbread, we goan eat good now... be some changes, you see!"―then, maybe it's just my ear for staying out of certain conversations.

My head was full of a chaos and confusion, as I walked with Sonny towards catching the F streetcar, headed towards the Embarcadero. My thoughts were suddenly amassing derivative expressions of angst, rebellion and defiance, raising a fist and shouting to the heavens that there must be a God, there must be an absolute rescue from this human disgrace, there must be a consciousness that cares!

I'd been wondering where the women were.

It was time to tune into the Holistic Reflective Agency of Sonny ("Nothing moved, not even the Monk. But strange things were beginning to fizz in its brain as they did from time to time when a piece of data became misaddressed as it passed through its input buffer"), a sort of interconnected fundamental means beyond the virtual tube of the web, wanting to tell me how to rid the city of PG&E, get unencumbered from crowded freeways and city streets and Muni trains, destroy silly politics I didn't need, and to bring some "leaky coax" and "kindle" into my life.

Sonny's distracting banter is always a good way to get my attention while targeting my base id of gimme-get-me-mine puerile solipsism with an over the top dharmic cyberkinetic super-consciousness, making me get all evangelistic with preachers using snakes and holy-rollers infiltrating my bloodstream.

He's like being with Ralph Ellison, Douglas Adams, Jamaica Kincaid, William Burroughs, Hunter S. Thompson, and Susan Straight, and all at once, mind you.

Sonny knows more about drug addiction and prisons than anyone who's actually been in those traps. He's given me a few lessons about the streets and homelessness like "it's what every good housewife should know"―which are the good neighborhoods at which time of day, which are the good SROs, which are the decent soup kitchens and when's the latest time to get there, especially if I'm busy, out job-hunting, all that Homelessness 101 stock of trade.

Besides which, especially with his off-handed humor and knowing more about science fiction's ultimate reality than anyone I've ever known, I just enjoy his company. Lately I've needed a good laugh and shock of reality.
Sometimes we need a shock of reality
"Some folks've known harassment their entire lives, enduring bullying, ostracism, truancy, suspensions, worse," Sonny was saying, "escapism being their only alternative, and consequentially dealing with a tag of a loser mentality, getting their only education from the streets, getting more and more rebellious and more and more defiant, still mau-mauing their obliquity to fit into the social compliance."

We stood on an island waiting for the streetcar, and here came all the women, in costumes, or not, on bikes on their way down Market Street to the Critical Mass ride.

"So when justice comes," Sonny continued to rant, "say, in the form of taking on the intimidation, that's the non-white capacity for dissent," he said, poking me in the shoulder with a grin.

"When your only encounter with police becomes a whole fucked up misuse of their power, and they're the ones actually missing the whole point of The American Way, beating senseless anyone who tries to overcome them doing their job as The Sordid Bearers of The Public Trust, and to hell with Constitutional rights," Sonny was almost irate, and I had to back away from his tirade for a breath, momentarily, trying to take in what he was saying.

"Just outright rejecting dispute, imprisoning those who'd had no previous arrests, no allegations of crimes, not even a damn tattoo... only holding to their convictions, accused of having dangerous minds, then that's when the perpetrators behind blind Lady Justice sneak up and suddenly they have lost their way, the police've twisted their badge's purpose indelibly into their prisoner's fool forehead, thereby forsaking whatever oath they'd taken, which don't rub off neither," he looked at me almost menacingly, "but my friends are prisoners, and they are in chains, in some hellhole that no lawyer'll ever get 'em out."

The streetcar was arriving and we got on, edging our way to the back down the aisle.

I was remembering a different kind of oath, just before I'd met up with Sonny ("to love, honor, and cherish").

I was hearing my friend, Sonny, telling me the San Francisco Eight predicament, people he'd known.

I was considering if, Tuesday, people go wild in the streets with crazy release, a maddening redemptive spirit raging in their blood and nervous systems, then we'll have to pay attention to the twisting of the DNA's will. "It's just human nature!" Sonny said.

Maybe then we'll have to listen to the women, I thought, the mothers out there, the mothers who've lost their children to the streets, the ones who know what to say ("just calm down, everyone gets a turn, let's not be acting like fools").

The winds had picked up speed. Clouds looked like they'd end up not raining.

The CM crowd assembled for its ride, bikes of all manner and persuasions, men in all manner of political masks and costumes, women in all manner of brazen and bare-breasted Mother Earth raiment of witchery.

"Which one you wanna say 'boo' to?" Sonny asked.



30 October 2008

When the revolution comes, the streets may be empty, except for those who care

All the cogs, gears, spokes and oiled machineries of politics are in full swing, with less than a week to go for the general election, although the pendulum of power may not bring any new dynamics.

Still, with desperation and resentment as the popular scope, people should always know they have solutions to make a difference.

Like when we pass the homeless on the street, we can't expect to help every time, and that it's fine to pass, knowing that we know we don't need to face depression, despair and outrage alone, that we have alternatives.

Being on a street corner all day panhandling doesn't always solve many problems, being on a street corner with others running scams and deals doesn't solve many problems, and being on a virtual street corner of television doesn't solve many problems.

For the last week, I've witnessed a pair of guys who've been standing regularly on the corner of Van Ness and Market in San Francisco, one in fatigues with a ukulele and the other in a straw hat and overalls with a banjo, spreading awareness, with their reworked bluegrass and folk tunes, wearing their t-shirts, "Cindy for Congress" (Sheehan, with her Congressional candidacy running a vibrant yet tough race against incumbent "imperialist corporatist" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, needs people like these two on the street corners of her district).

These two with their ukulele and banjo had a solution for their dissent and outrage; at least they sounded just fine to me, in passing, since I was busily on my way doing other life pastimes (looking for work, affordable food and housing), without the time to listen to Scruggs and Guthrie. I'd've tipped my hat had I had one.

Being conscious of CauseCast, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Kiva, and other cyberbroadcasts of charitable hope, people have shared their ways to change reality and to solve problems on their street corner of the web, as well as with their virtual lives and with their actual lives.

As a political act of spontaneity, for instance, Critical Mass will have Halloween in full force with its importance of acting out, showing up, giving voice and sharing (cyclists plan only to gather, then trek not altogether aimlessly around San Francisco, maybe in costumes; the event began in 1992, quickly spreading to cities all over the world); at the end of every month, CM's a regular event, expressing justice, freedom, and individual and mass rights, sentiments we all share.
Some street history, trying to spare the air of hyperbole
CM is not an organization, it's an "unorganized coincidence," a movement of bicyclists in the streets, with a variety of participants, respect of traffic laws (or, with Amassers, lack thereof), interaction with motorists, and intervention by police.

Googling, I found The Critical Mass site declaring, "it's not the official Critical Mass web page, because there is no official Critical Mass web page," and "there are, however, a bunch of unofficial web pages" (likewise, there is no official website for San Francisco's coalition). The lack of a web presence did make me wonder, since the devotion is so grassroots and prevalent.

However, I know the real history of CM comes from talking to the dedicated few who've continued the rides, as often as they can (even when they miss some monthly events due to being out of the country or on some other city's CM ride). There are those who've made a full time task out of showing support (like Mona Caron, with her Duboce Bikeway mural, in development, a sketch of which appears at right).

There is much historical information concerning CM's coalitions: San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, Mission Coalition, Shaping SF (where there are some great pictures), a vast number of official splinter groups, such as Babylon By Bike, Dildo Man, SF Bay Area Superheroes and several other factions, email discussion lists (where the usual baiting and pandering exists, some of the claims pure hyperbole, some self-aggrandizing, some genuinely useful), wikis, and the real important organizations of monkeys pelting motorists with bananas.

"Eventually, we'll get all the lot sorted out, anon," one original CM founder, a Brit, Jeremy, proudly claims, "if was ever the opportunity, today's time's the "ever was."
Out on the streets, opportunity shares its meaning
As riders hit the streets this Friday, Halloween, there will be the forces of politics cheering the cyclists.

There will be, among others, even in the rain, the presence of Cindy Sheehan (who's had to abandon her blog for legal reasons while running for Congress, yet isn't afraid to hit the streets, with her protests at the Federal Reserve, her fearlessness with getting arrested for a good cause, like peace, and her plain dedication to being in the trenches of politics for the sake of real people).

There, also, will be former San Francisco Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval, who's trying to unseat Superior Court Judge Mellon, whose abusive behavior on the bench is notorious―though there are worse examples―having told defendants their publicly appointed attorney was "acting the fool," while meanwhile getting the full support of Republicans across the state by increasing prison populations. After comments went public, the presiding judge moved Mellon from criminal court to civil court, the position which Sandoval will take.

Likely to be there is Eric Mar, a Board of Supervisors candidate, one of many for District 1, the Richmond district, campaigning for education and fair housing rights against the harsh turpitude and animosity of a deceitful leading opponent, backed by rich landlords and richer realtors, Sue Lee, who's claimed on television ads and with direct phone calls that Mar's "for segregation in schools," since he wants to ensure every child in the city has a school to attend; Lee's campaign smears claim Mar's also "against America" with his "phasing out JROTC recruitment in public schools." In reality, Mar, a school board member, wants to create "more leadership in schools with SERV (Student Emergency Response Volunteers)."

With an approachability like a seasoned teacher, having a smile and a voice that magnetize, and a reticence at times when listening that is ever ready to march out on the streets to support the causes of freedom, fairness and equality, always with children in mind, Mar likes to say, "my daughters, especially my oldest, are my strongest campaigners, since they keep me on track." When he was out in the rain, doing his community grassroots vitalization, shaking hands, asking people their concerns for their neighborhoods, their schools, their daily lives, his daughters came first: "they'd remind me when people had had enough of me," he says, "and when it's time to get out of the rain." He seems to know what people need, since he always listens, nodding, as he speaks to you, to see if you get his point, still smiling, "foremost and first, children."

Lee, meanwhile has a silent, disingenuously hidden agenda, having been a member of the Planning Commission. Her business friends know they can protect their interests with her on the board. She blamed Mar for what guerrilla campaigning forces tried to make clear when the Richmond neighborhood communities began to unravel the smears from her campaign's version of truth.

As we wait for the counting of the votes for Supervisors (Elections Chief John Arntz expects delays, due to the ranked-choice voting system), we hope the political machinery gets its proper lubrication (we expect rain, it's slated to stay for a week from Friday).

Speaking of lubrication, likely to be there, also, is Joe Alioto, Jr. He's also running―perhaps literally, at the mass―as a Board of Supervisors candidate, for District 3, which encompasses North Beach, Russian Hill and Chinatown. Running mostly on his family name with no record of accomplishments, besides lying about being a former prosecutor, having been just a summer law clerk, playing immature dirty tricks to win, and being sister of Michaela and a cousin of Mayor Newsom, Joe will be there with others, expressing support for the crowd, mirroring all the topical, significant campaign issues, and joining the ride, unless it rains.

Where and how candidates spend their time is as important as where they get their money, which is what greases the machinery of politics and business. The clouds gather as we sleep.

Everyone in their politically soporific correctness has, of course, their minds on the Presidential race with Obama and McCain (who asserts "nothing's over yet"), while the vital issues to everyone's lives locally are within the propositions, and the measures, which get no real coverage, no attention and no honest scope.

8 (supporting marriage for all individuals, primarily known as the "gay marriage initiative") gets all the attention due to all the community involvement and stability of allegiance against the heavy-handed opposition from derisive homophobic innuendoes and religious rights advocacy, out in full bloom (some people can't get sodomy out of their heads, no matter on what street corner).

With the arrests this last week of the Mara Salvatrucha ("MS-13"), the gang whose roots are from El Salvador yet whose wealth comes from prisons and the hard streets of California, the perspective was perhaps lost on propositions 5 ($460 million for non-violent offenders' rehabilitation), 6 ($1 billion for law enforcement) and 9 (parole statutes). Our prisons are training grounds; they need reform not funding for the justice system.

With the economy's turmoil, it's a wonder why some people haven't a clue, haven't voted, haven't decided, haven't looked at their pamphlets, haven't a reason to vote except what's in the news or on their cellphones texting them ("ya cant bitch if ya dint vote"); what's startling is the ignorance of the pending impact of the state propositions:
All the propositions should make us look at ourselves in the 21st century as in a fundamental upheaval of indifference to our planet or of questioning maintaining a system that protects primarily old wealth, making the machinery come to a grinding halt, an old rusted chassis on the street corner without even a song or a story.

Local measures should also get more appropriate attention:
All the measures have controversial issues for many individuals, even in their own minds.

As much as we use the web for entertainment, for research, for organizing, we sometimes forget its bit-states or caches of hyperlinks providing information that we forget everyone shares. And when it comes time to vote, there are not many resources besides paper pamphlets to use for helping many people decide. Resources tend to be the media, television mostly, since we avoid the street corner for our scope of attention, and the web gets to be a place that's too daunting to google, simply to mitigate understanding the issues and their consequences.

One of the founding architects of cyberspace, John Perry Barlow ("the first responsibility of a human being is to be a better ancestor"), established "A Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace."

Its seminal beauty declares the carefully expressed sentiment and dream of how, with the web, ownership of "legal concepts of property, expression, identity, movement, and context do not apply."

Barlow, along with Mitch Kapor, John Gilmore and others of the techie quotient, have always been nerd-shepherds directly responsible for ensuring the legacy of the web and all its flock, beyond just the techie elite.

"Information is not a noun," Barlow has commandingly said, likely with that mischievous grin and huge biker's hands pensively scratching that barely clippered beard. "There is no difference between a song and shop-lifting a toaster."

Which makes me wonder, when it comes to voting, why haven't we more resources for getting or keeping informed other than the biased media and the funded committees supporting or opposing candidates?

For all propositions, measures, and any other proprietaries, aren't they all important reasons for voting?

The League of Women Voters does a fine job showing us the facts, so do the wikis, yet it makes me wonder about the responsible intelligentsia of hackers, who vote, of their indifference to others' needs for information-seeking with voting, whether it's just too much controversy to join the street corner mentality, or too much futile effort to waste with educating the hoi polloi. All the informational resources are available, yet not tidily accessible.

A new pedia may be necessary (paedia? paideia?), if not a new googling.

I'll think about the issue and discuss it with the CM crowd on Halloween. Maybe even show them my pedia on bikes (I'm sure glad I've voted).

The clouds gather as I wait.


28 October 2008

Affordable reality: "mincome arcology," a fiction's imaginings for homeless to hope

On Valencia, at the Curtis Hotel (a weekly residential flophouse), having spent the twilight hours of a morning worrying why my urine reeked and why my pheromones and sleep cycles were whack, I finally realized―from recalling what I'd eaten the previous night, a takeout Mongolian chicken with asparagus, all the woody stems still digesting (which I'd've discarded had I cooked the dish), and from vague recollections of what I'd read, a 20-year old scifi by William Gibson, the second in his "Neuromancer" trilogy, "Count Zero" (the third being "Mona Lisa Overdrive"), these two excavations of my psyche cored into the troubles―why I was wide awake wondering about piss stink, cockroaches and affordable housing, mostly the latter concern.

"Count Zero" has a masterpiece description of the holoporn projection of the Ono-Sendai unit that malfunctions on Bobby Newmark ("aka Count Zero"), setting off a whole chain of events backwards and forwards in fictional time.

I'd been looking for the "mincome arcology" reference that I thought had been a throwaway in some chapter, reminding me in my non-fictional grim reality in San Francisco, being near homeless, of imaginable alternatives.

This was the episode that was upsetting my psyche's sleep cycle, a writer's problem surely, I'd thought, which only happens to another writer, the compelling regenerative perspective perpetrating the disturbance.

My mind kept hunting instinctively for the nerve behind the story's motive. And my own folly perhaps of imagination.

I tried the first chapter, with its depictions of Turner, the introduction of the tech-commando character who's behind a biochip's recovery driving the story.

He spent most of those three months in a ROM-generated simstim construct of an idealized New England boyhood of the previous century. The Dutchman's visits were gray dawn dreams, nightmares that faded as the sky lightened beyond his secondfloor bedroom window. You could smell the lilacs, late at night. He read Conan Doyle by the light of a sixty-watt bulb behind a parchment shade printed with clipper ships.
He masturbated in the smell of clean cotton sheets and thought about cheerleaders. The Dutchman opened a door in his back brain and came strolling in to ask questions, but in the morning his mother called him down to Wheaties, eggs and bacon, coffee with milk and sugar.
And one morning he woke in a strange bed, the Dutchman standing beside a window spilling tropical green and a sunlight that hurt his eyes. "You can go home now, Turner. We're done with you. You're good as new."


from "1: Smooth Running Man" in "COUNT ZERO"
Copyright © 1986 by William Gibson


Nope, that description wasn't what I was after, I said to myself as I'd stared out the window, its cracked glass still holding remnants of the vinegar stench from a silicone sealant. Lights on in several houses across the rooftops, looking out over Lexington towards Mission in my view, showed signs of insomniacs (who may or may not have been troubled in the same way with what I'd been experiencing).

That excerpt wasn't where I'd seen the bit I needed.

The "mincome arcology" reference was utopian, establishing the vision that Paolo Soleri and other socio-geniuses have incorporated in their global village architectures for people who desperately need affordable housing.

The thought still needed some archaeological digging and fixing, a writer's hope surely, that I could see delving into its potential manifestation.

The asparagus stems would pass.

Songbirds were awakening the then quiet neighborhood to its soon normal urban cacophony of garbagemen tossing plastic bins with glass bottles crashing and engines stirring the cylindrical crush of cluttered metal and mass paper waste. Shadows detectably began inching out the darkness with the first daylight's streams.

I'd returned to reading "Count Zero" in the sixth chapter. I still had some questions.

Mincome arcology?

Affordable reality?

Home?

In a few hours, the first lights would start blinking on in the dark bulks of the Projects. Big Playground swept away like a concrete sea; the Projects rose beyond the opposite shore, vast rectilinear structures softened by a random overlay of retrofitted greenhouse balconies, catfish tanks, solar heating systems, and the ubiquitous chicken-wire dishes.
Two-a-Day would be up there now, sleeping, in a world Bobby had never seen, the world of a mincome arcology. Two-a-Day came down to do business, mostly with the hotdoggers in Barrytown, and then he climbed back up. It had always looked good to Bobby, up there, so much happening on the balconies at night, amid red smudges of charcoal, little kids in their underwear swarming like monkeys, so small you could barely see them. Sometimes the wind would shift, and the smell of cooking would settle over Big Playground, and sometimes you'd see an ultralight glide out from some secret country of rooftop so high up there. And always the mingled beat from a million speakers, waves of music that pulsed and faded in and out of the wind.


from "6: Barrytown" in "COUNT ZERO"

Copyright © 1986 by William Gibson


There it was, of course, the reference, right after the main scene of the main malfunction Bobby experiences with the holoprojection, "mincome arcology."
First exploration of affordable reality
In this bleak, bug-infested SRO hotel room, there I was, establishing my reality of some utopian homeless perseverance of affordable housing.

The bed's mattress was older than the book I was reading, if not older than me, with its fitted-plastic covering for bed-wetters or to fend off bed bugs under raggedy sheets that had seen better days. The linoleum was a peeling hideous mess, the tables and chairs, which I was lucky to have, were varnished with tawny shellac and chipping reddish enamel, the curtains were flimsy lace having social pretensions, and cockroach infestation was a major aggravation (crawling across the room in armies in the bright light, which made me shudder to consider what there'd be when the lights were off); the room's main focus was a television (only broadcasting whatever came off the antennae from Sutro Tower, three white noise local stations), and, unexpectedly, the wifi was weak, if at all available. The space was a roof over my head, nothing utopian, barely renegade, perfect for my needs in the Mission, centralized for the city's prospects of my work searches for a couple of weeks. I could read and ignore the television's presence taking up my space.

I had plenty to amuse me. And plenty to loathe.

With rent control laws now, landlords strictly abide by the conditional terms of tenancy; if you don't comply, within thirty days time, they must not allow you staying there. Therefore, you must either agree to meet all their demands or you must move to the next place that accepts you, for whatever time being.

Usually, the demands are set by one's credit rating, with no explanations allowed with respect to the rating's arbitrary numbers.

If I hadn't paid a doctor bill on time, my rating number fell, if I had ever had an eviction, my number fell, if I had ever been without a job and kept a bank account open for longer than a year without any activity, my number fell. My rating was just below 550, and any number lower than 600 is suspect. I only had some overdue bills and the lack of steady income, no civil claims against me, and no evictions. It was all this Equifax, Experian, and Trans-Union arbitrary credit reporting agency bugaboo.

Still I wasn't meeting the standards of terms and conditions for tenancy. Likewise, I wasn't meeting the standards for subsidized housing, which, had I remained destitute and homeless six months previous, when I was in a shelter, I'd've been eligible.

Rock and a hard place.

Yes; there it was, the "mincome arcology" reference that I'd lost, in the first sentence of the fifth paragraph of the second sub-section of the book's sixth chapter, "Barrytown." It all streamed back to me like the morning's sunbeams bringing their orangish-yellow brilliance into the subtle grey shadows across the walls of the Curtis Hotel that morning.

Yes, there I was, finding how affordable housing works in San Francisco: $200+ per week, for a room about the size of a prison cell, six by nine feet, except for having more privacy, with locked showers and toilets down the hall, and no kitchen.

A few blocks away, on Potrero, Martin de Porres provides free meals that are a blessing by anyone's standards; I've helped with preparing and serving their food, so I know firsthand the actual ingredients for the comestibles (simple foods, locally grown and in season, a treat by any epicurean design, and the staff watches the bottom line of costs and portions, even though they don't feed a fraction as many during the whole week as St. Anthony's or Glide do daily, so they know when to cut off the lines).

"Messiah complex, hmmm," said one heavily tattooed guy, twenty-something, pale, a shock of bleached white hair framing his face, standing aside me this one morning on the corner where I stood at a traffic light, waiting to see how the lines were for food. "You somebody doesn't mess around."

I'd not realized he was speaking to me. He'd referred to how I dressed, my shirt, a white collarless cotton long-sleeved standby of mine and my fairly short clipped hair and beard, my blue jeans. I'd reflexively fawned scratching my nose to stop from laughing. He knew me from working at the food line at Martin de Porres.

"Not me, bub, I'm just looking for work," I commented back.

"Not my style, man," he said, which made him shift off into wondering about "all the white suddenly in the neighborhood, yourself included." I turned away from any further interaction or any behind the back comments. "And dude," he said, "I'm straight." I shook my head and walked with the light.

The culture of the area is predominantly cyberpunk/Latino/hiphop, with a broad other spectrum to balance out any misgivings.

Leather, spikes, chains, tattered construction dungarees, and tribal tattooes.

So with my budget for living being within reasonable limits, despite the deprivations around me, my complaints were minimal.

There was always amusement.
Second exploration of affordable reality
When it came time to move on, I went to Little Saigon, the area of the Tenderloin near Civic Center, which, where I was at the Balboa Hotel, being on Hyde near Golden Gate, was a bit of a shock.

The room was a huge improvement.

The rife culture was a stretch: scoring was a dream, for pills, bud, rock, and any flavor of sex, if that's what was desirable (not for me). "Mother-freakin' jokers," one guy in a group of bangers had said, leaving the corner doughnut hangout, my first night there, "not know where they comin' or goin', bein' they's makes they money off the local shrift." St. Anthony's is nearby, so I assumed the comment had to do with the monitors of the food line crowd two blocks down the street, more than with the neighborhood's regulars who pass their time at the tables inside the place they'd just left, not even a half-block away from where I'd be staying.

Jailin' oversizers flashing bling, or propped six-inch-heeled knee-boot types with piercings and breast implants that don't belong on a living being, and drug-running gear meant for agendas about which I may not want to know.

"You synthesize?" one goth sixfoot, in a hooded swath of weather-beaten black leather frock, said to me one early evening, which took me a moment to answer, in that, first, here I wasn't sure I was getting a musical invitation, a sexual proposition, or a drug combination solicitation.

"I'm, not, sure," I half-stuttered. "I, I just moved here," I stammered, as I'd fumbled for the keys to the Balboa Hotel's heavy metal front gate. The wind was blowing and the gangbangers comments had made me wary of lingering about outside.

"Maybe later, babycakes?" The dialect cross between Puerto Rican, trans-Asian, Seattle-Afro, and downriver New Orleans 9th Ward Creole, all tumbled together made me momentarily falter, and I just affectedly nodded, assuming the conversation had definitely not been about any musical invitation. "I likes squeeze."

I looked back at a vacuous stare. "Yes," I said, "I mean, um, later, much later."

"Oh. Okay. Thanks."

For the most part, I avoided interaction with most people in the neighborhood, since everyone seemed to have wanted something from me, everything but conversation.

The room itself was twelve by fifteen square with huge closets; the bed was a luxury after the last I'd had, a mattress nearly new, and, though the television was still the main focus in the room's arrangement, it wasn't what gave me the comfortable relaxation; it was that the wifi link was strong and the cockroaches were nonexistent.

My stay there was brief, the same three weeks before the landlord's recognition of tenancy took into account my status, which again depends on my credit rating. I knew what my alternatives were.
Third exploration of affordable reality
Russian Hill was not one of the alternatives that I'd originally had, the location being very high to high-middle to middle working class. As with the Mission, there're crowded bars and plenty of folks making the rounds.

Collegiate types dressed casually conversing with guys in $5000 Armani suits flaunting the latest, sleekest phones, scanning the women in their finest wear sporting their tough bitch urbaneity with nearly identically meaningless yet flirtatious expressions while scrolling their iPods, and clusters of parents with their strollers and toddlers, discussing the popularly significant topics of the day.

There I was, staying at the Broadway Hotel, probably the best of the SRO situations in San Francisco. "How you like yer pad?" one of the other residents asked me the first night of being there. "Nice neighborhood, huh?"

"It's a roof," I'd replied, with my best grin.

"You get tube?"

"No. I don't need it. I've got wifi though, which is all I need."

"Cool, man, you can come watch in the room down the hall, if you want, just me and my lady. You play cribbage?"

"Yes. Though I really need to spend most of my time looking for work. But thanks!"

"Offer stands," he'd said. The sense of being home seemed almost a reality for the moment.

Good food is abundant, a cultural diversity, too, like the Mission, yet not as cheap; for affordable, it's a search (this is beginning to sound like some Yelp blurb for the homeless tourist; panhandling is at a minimum on this stretch of Polk in its gulch below Russian Hill, yet there are the occasional requests, to which I must humbly submit or pass, depending on my budget's constraints at the time).

No obvious dealing is evident.

And no cockroaches, which made me wonder of their scarcity, despite the zoning and the cultural mix.

A window offers a view of potted palms and corydalis in planter boxes. I hardly hear traffic or sirens, though the 101 Van Ness corridor or the Broadway tunnel to North Beach are only blocks away.

I'm sure I could find some complaints.

Places in the city, certain ones especially, make me feel the resilience, an embryonic link to a way out of the nakedness of homelessness, a slide into worrisome jumbles of despair, desperation and through them to perseverance when I leave, picturing the mincome arcology on the horizon, the reality stretch, one of no mere imagination.

Homeless can't depend only on fiction for hope.



26 October 2008

Keep friends close, America learns, and keep enemies closer

If your enemies advise you to avoid things, objects to which you're attached, you might avoid them.

Not the things, the enemies; and, wondering why the enemies wanted you to avoid the things, you'd ask, "what's their interest?"

So, I'm telling you to avoid this blog, much as you'd avoid some homeless on the street who'd ask you to do something for them!

You may not want to hear how this story plays out. It's not like you'd be sniffing packets, or discovering lost footage, or following maps of buried treasure: all the sources have protection and some identities are secret. "Move along,"as the cops say, "nothing to see here."


/* ********** Standard Disclaimer for Blog & You ***********
/*
/* #include

    "This blog does not accept responsibility for
    any effects, adverse or otherwise, that this
    blog may have on you, the game, spectators,
    your computer, your sanity, your dog, the rules
    and anything else that you can think of. Read
    at your own risk."</std_disclaimer.h-ooo-hah!>

********* Standard Disclaimer for Blog & You Ends **********
/* </std_disclaimer.h-ooo-hah!>
*/


Remember how a voice commands you, "Swipe your card and verify your password, please!"

You know the move, automatically, as you've done hundreds of times with regularity, and you don't need the voice commanding you. You know what's in your interest.

In the United States, most people forget automatically that they have had certain rights and responsibilities, taking for granted that it's just a way of doing business (much as they'd been taking for granted their Constitution that provides for rights and responsibilities, with which they're familiar from school or when in any legal dilemma, and yet, they quickly forget its guarantees); so, much as they might know how laws ensure that the debit comes from them straight to the entity with which they've just had a transaction, although not necessarily guaranteeing their privacy, their concerns and consequent considerations, or their autonomy with respect to any purchase, they swipe their card, since it's in their interest.

Porn and gambling, or other similar impulse purchases (generally impetuous extravagances and other such splurges with which they engaged) taught that expensive lesson; their friends have all had a good laugh at their expense, for that moment, until it happened to them, as, now, they and their friends are all in the same boat, holding to the same rope, with the rest of us.

For interest.

However long the moment lasts with the economic momentum about which we're all anxious, we must learn the game.
You have enemies and they know about you or people like you
A momentum takes effect by such causes we assume are constant; we've just gotten used to them, or we've gotten to have been used by them and we then realize there's not much we can do, except futile complaining.

In physics, momentum is, teachers remind us, "the magnitude of such an effect, expressed as the product of the force and the distance from its line of action to a given point," and in lessons about economics (Economics 101, with statistics as its basis) "failure/success or winning/losing within the momentum's force," teachers remind us, inordinately, "have dependencies, the first moment is the mean, the second moment the variance, the third moment the skew, and the fourth moment the kurtosis." Whether it's real physics or speculative economics, the momentum for any thing is, dependably, flux. Flux always has its laws, or rules of principle, which makes the game compelling. Dependencies are in flux.

The U.S. Constitution mostly provides for inalienable rights, with and for which our culture works, business especially, because of what we have as "no taxation without representation," meaning no taxing without the powers that be accounting for the even balance of trade, which, however, is no longer an accountability serving the people, only the powers that be, invisibly, profiting on our ignorance of how trade works. Inalienable means something that can't be taken away from or given away by the possessor; beliefs are inalienable as long as they last, balance being a thing that doesn't last, due to flux, upsetting at times.

Yes, we often forget the Constitution, as it applies to us, even when it matters.

Our enemies have our interest. There's the upset.

And, yes, by the way, W plans to live, after he must leave the White House, somewhere other than America to avoid extradition for treason, Argentina, from what rumors say (no one knows yet of Cheney, Rove, Rice, Greenspan, Rumsfeld, and their plans), as if it matters, when Congressional Speaker Pelosi would not even proceed to impeach W, yet would still let impeachment proceedings run the course for President Clinton's sexual exploits.

The game has rules that some dare to alter.
Understanding how we could be homeless with credit and interest due
Originally, taxing and derivative accounting, or credit, were established by our forefathers to ensure that our troops didn't starve, and leaders like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, John Quincy Adams and James Monroe well knew that potential blight as an insidious right: no soldier deserved such abjure abandon (they should not starve on the battlefield), and surrender was the chance too (torture or absolute neglect should never occur), which the Monroe Doctrine ensured that such likelihood would never happen to the citizenry or those protecting the citizenry, chiefly from threat by those powerful entities like Britain, Greece, Russia and anyone else who had plans to try to take and to hold the republic and to oppress rather than to lead with government, the people, by hegemony. Not everyone recognizes the rights.

"We the people..." is how it goes. Remember?

The U.S. has claimed that it would be justified in taking military action against a nation in the Western Hemisphere because it defaulted on debts or mistreated foreign subjects, since the Monroe Doctrine forbid doing so (in such instances, therefore, the United States had to exercise "an international police power," like with Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the NSA's spook wars).

Unfortunately, the Monroe Doctrine became (or has become) a Manifest Destiny that railroaded this republic into a quest for gold and greed rather than hope and grace, nearly annihilating the American Indians and subjugating the American Africans, the American Chinese and others to a slavery close to death, if not death by hanging, lynching or worse.

Although the U.S. invoked the Monroe Doctrine on occasion during the 1930s, World War II, and since, it effectively became an anachronism after World War I, when the United States became so powerful that it could no longer even attempt to confine its influence to the Western Hemisphere.

Such protectionism, wielding oppression, savagery and genocide, has never given us clear conscience for our destiny or fate as a republic: America deserves better, and its challenge is to face its past and to rectify a facing of grace.
What prevails (other than outrage), when there's no saving grace
We had started to see hints of that approach, of getting ourselves out of the hole of debt due to credit, in the latter part of the 20th century, yet greed and oppressiveness prevailed.

Credit, we've learned, has irreparably always been tied to taxes, since the Constitution intended to mandate such coercion as incentive for derivative accounting to pay for governing everyone. We accepted such a reality for democracy's benefits (or our forefathers did, actually, in perpetuity, for us in their stead, for legacy reasons, which we're still coming to understand). Hence, why capitalism in its ideal form is the choice for the republic. Other actively available economic choices could still prevail, when the next revolution comes: first, we'd have to have a momentum of uprising against the powers that control the eminent domain of our nation's bounty, to get us back to balance.

Momentum tends to restore balance.

We've come close to such uprising, despite the continuing "consumption of oil in the United States, Europe and Japan, and the global economic turmoil risks spreading to emerging economies like China."

The nation must first get back its sense of being a republic again for balance.

Perhaps we might even think about a real plan, a real business plan, for America's fiscal mess, not just this fly-by-the-seat-of-our-pants plan.

We've had hope and a sense of rectifying the destiny and fate of America as a republic. We'd felt that a woman of integrity, for instance, not a man, could lead us, and thereby render the need for uprising impertinent, instead letting the insolent lead a silenced call for change. Change still comes, in the stead of hope, for many of us. Our pending election represents hope and that is what America demands, else life will get very sad and ugly and crazy.

Our concerns of hope and change for this 2008 election have more to do with change at a local perspective, although the bigger picture is still part of that intent for the concern. Our astronomic federal debt procludes help getting to the local level with any urgency, instead spread by bureaucracy, slowly, if at all. We see the same path to politics with lies and deception in practice and in use, ultimately wielding a message of "power at any price." We cannot let such practice and use prevail, even if bureaucracies allow its neglect.

We must keep our hope and grace. We may have to forget for awhile about saving face, in order to keep the better prize, one of saving grace. That may be the only game worth playing.
Will the republic fall due to its dependencies?
So you know to swipe your card. Do you know how to protect its use beyond keeping your password secret? You'd find out if ever you found your account overdrawn without your aforethought complicity.

We have had this reality in America.

So you know how to use your keys, or cyberlocks? Do you know how to protect proprietary trespassing? You'd find out if you knew how to protect things.

We have had this reality in America.

So you know how to protect your intellectual property, and, as corollary, whatever you've ever created (anything creative that is a tangible thing)? Do you know you don't always automatically have protection?

We have had this reality in America.

Not just rights, also responsibilities, within that protection? You'd find out if ever you sold all rights of use.

Or if you didn't realize you were in a game.

There is always a game.

You may have already won (as your email tells you in messages of Nigerian winnings announcements, Indonesian dating services, offshore Costa Rican online gambling opportunities).

You may not even know you've lost.

There are no ties in many games; remember about death, taxes, and commodification ("everything has a need to be a property" and someone wants, needs and will have that thing, even if it's an intangible sometimes, at any price, and with accumulating interest, not just on the principal).


/* *************** Game::GameIsNotOver() ****************
This predicate member function makes known
whether the game has ended.
______________________________________ */

bool Game::GameIsNotOver()

{

    bool game_not_over;